Optimizing Tip Diameter in Phacoemulsification of Varying Lens Sizes: An in vitro Study

References

• Devgan U, Colvard DM, Beardsley TL, Bobrow JC, Isbey EKI. Basic principles of phacoemulsification and fluid dynamics. Am Acad Ophthalmol. 2010;28:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Farukhi AM, Stagg BC, Ronquillo C Jr, et al. Effect of phaco tip diameter on efficiency and chatter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(5):811–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobrow JC, Beardsley TL, Jick SL, et al. Anatomy: capsule. In: Cantor LB, Rapuano CJ, Cioffi GA, editors. Basic and Clinical Science Course 2014–2015 Lens and Cataract, Section 11. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2015:7.
   Google Scholar
• DeMill DL, Zaugg BE, Pettey JH, et al. Objective comparison of 4 nonlongitudinal ultrasound modalities regarding efficiency and chatter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(6):1065–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakey ZB, Jensen JD, Zaugg BE, et al. Porcine lens nuclei as a model for comparison of 3 ultrasound modalities regarding efficiency and chatter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(8):1248–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta I, Cahoon JM, Gardiner G, et al. Effect of increased vacuum and aspiration rates on phacoemulsification efficiency. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(4):836–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg BC, Gupta I, Cahoon J, et al. Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(5):354–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi DS, Jensen JD, Kramer GD, et al. Comparison of vacuum and aspiration on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter using a monitored forced infusion system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:162–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulter T, Jensen JD, Christensen MD, et al. Comparison of a torsional and a standard tip with a monitored forced infusion phacoemulsification system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(4):613–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, Shi DS, Robinson MS, et al. Torsional power study using CENTURION phacoemulsification technology. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(8):710–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garff K, Jensen JD, Cahoon J, et al. Impact of micropulsed ultrasound power settings on the efficiency and chatter associated with lens-fragment removal. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1264–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk KR, Ronquillo C Jr, Jensen JD, et al. Optimum on-time duty cycle for micropulse technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(9):1545–1548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta I, Zaugg B, Stagg BC, et al. Phacoemulsification efficiency with a radiused phaco tip. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(5):818–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner GL, Garff K, Gupta I, et al. Effect of pulsing ultrasound on phacoemulsification efficiency. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(11):2560–2564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert M, Zaugg B, Stagg B, et al. Safety profile of venturi versus peristaltic phacoemulsification pumps in cataract surgery using a capsular surrogate for the human lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160(1):179–184.e1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, Boulter T, Lambert NG, et al. Intraocular pressure study using monitored forced-infusion system phacoemulsification technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(5):768–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, Kirk KR, Gupta I, et al. Determining optimal ultrasound off time with micropulse longitudinal phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):433–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen BS, Gardiner G, Garff K, et al. Thermal evaluation of two phacoemulsification systems. Can J Ophthalmol. 2016;51(1):14–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulter T, Christensen MD, Jensen JD, et al. Optimization and comparison of a 0.7 mm tip with the 0.9 mm tip on an active-fluidics phacoemulsification platform. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(12):1591–1595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright AJ, Thomson RS, Bernhisel AA, et al. Effect of chamber stabilization software on efficiency and chatter in a porcine lens model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(11):1464–1467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DD, Wright AJ, Boulter TD, et al. Optimization of transversal phacoemulsification settings in peristaltic mode using a new transversal ultrasound machine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(9):1202–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahoon JM, Gupta I, Gardiner G, et al. Comparison of venturi and peristaltic vacuum in phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):428–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquillo CC Jr, Zaugg B, Stagg B, et al. Determining optimal torsional ultrasound power for cataract surgery with automatic longitudinal pulses at maximum vacuum ex vivo. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(6):1262–1266.e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbara S, Heczko JB, Bernhisel AA, et al. Effect of high vacuum and aspiration on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter using a transversal ultrasound machine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(11):1378–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbara S, Heczko J, Ta B, et al. Determining optimal ultrasound percent on time with long-pulse torsional phacoemulsification. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(3):395–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha L, Wright A, Wright DD, et al. High vacuum and aspiration on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter for centurion. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(1):136–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner AD, Wright AJ, Ta BT, et al. Optimum on-time duty cycle for a transversal ultrasound machine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(9):1140–1143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson RS, Bird BA, Stutz LA, et al. The effect of increasing power when grooving using phacoemulsification. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:611–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulter T, Bernhisel A, Mamalis C, et al. Phacoemulsification in review: optimization of cataract removal in an in vitro setting. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019;64(6):868–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhisel AA, Cahoon JM, Sella R, et al. Optimum on-time and off-time combinations for micropulse phacoemulsification in venturi vacuum mode. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(12):1797–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner A, Peterson JS, Wright AJ, et al. Effects on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter at variable longitudinal ultrasound settings when combined with constant torsional energy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(5):774–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbara SW, Heczko J, Ta B, et al. Impact of torsional micropulse on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(5):560–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisseiev E, Kinori M, Glovinsky Y, Loewenstein A, Moisseiev J, Barak A. Retained lens fragments: nucleus fragments are associated with worse prognosis than cortex or epinucleus fragments. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2011;21(6):741–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar