The Combined Use of Silicone and Green Braided Polyester ‎Suture (Ethibond) versus ‎Silicone or Ethibond Alone for Frontalis ‎Suspension Surgery in Children

References

• Katowitz JA. Frontalis suspension in congenital ptosis using a polyfilament, cable-type suture. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:1659–1663. doi:10.1001/archopht.1979.01020020227009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinkogler FJ, Kuchar A, Huber E, Arocker-Mettinger E. Gore-Tex soft tissue patch frontalis suspension technique in congenital ptosis and in blepharophimosis-ptosis syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:1057–1060. doi:10.1097/00006534-199311000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner RS, Mauriello JA, Nelson LB, Calhoun JH, Flanagan JC, Harley RD. Treatment of congenital ptosis with frontalis suspension: a comparison of suspensory materials. Ophthalmology. 1984;91:245–248. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(84)34298-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim CY, Yoon JS, Bae JM, Lee SY. Prediction of postoperative eyelid height after frontalis suspension using autogenous fascia lata for pediatric congenital ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(2):334–342. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer CK, Albert DM. The use and fate of fascia lata and sclera in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:869–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford JS. Repair of ptosis using frontalis muscle and fascia lata: a 20 year review. Ophthalmic Surg. 1977;8(4):31–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downes RN, Collin JR. The mersilene mesh sling—a new concept in ptosis surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1989;73:498–501. doi:10.1136/bjo.73.7.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman BN, Sprunger DT, Helveston EM. Comparison of materials used in frontalis suspension. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(5):687–691. doi:10.1001/archopht.119.5.687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintschich CR, Zurcher M, Collin JR. Mersilene mesh brow suspension: efficacy and complications. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79(4):358–361. doi:10.1136/bjo.79.4.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillet CW, Tillet GM. Silicone sling in the correction of ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;62:521–523. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(66)91334-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtarzadeh A, Harrison AR. Controversies and advances in the management of congenital ptosis. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2015;10(1):59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yulish M, Pikkel J. Evaluation of polybutylate-coated braided polyester (Ethibond) sutures for levator-advancement blepharoptosis repair. Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:763731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Everett WG. Sutures, incisions and anastomoses. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1970;8:14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgin LK, Yeniad B. The long-term results of frontalis suspension using autogenous fascia lata in children with congenital ptosis under 3 years old. Plast Surg Int. 2010;2010:609462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crawford JS. Repair of ptosis using frontalis muscle and fascia. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1956;60(5):672–678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philandrianos C, Galinier P, Salazard B, Bardot J, Magalon G. Long-term outcome of frontalis suspension using autogenous temporal fascia or fascia lata in children. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(5):782–786. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.01.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben Simon GJ, Macedo AA, Schwarcz RM, Wang DY, McCann JD, Goldberg RA. Frontalis suspension for upper eyelid ptosis: evaluation of different surgical designs and suture material. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(5):877–885. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon KA, Shipley RJ, Edirisinghe M, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of synthetic brow-suspension materials. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;35:220–230. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2013.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen ET. An experimental and clinical evaluation of surgical suture materials. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958;106(2):216–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi S, Shin JH, Cheong Y, Lee HJ, Jin KH, Park HK. Nano-structural investigation of frontalis sling biomaterial surfaces. Scanning. 2011;33(6):419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah KP, Mukherjee B. Efficacy of frontalis suspension with silicone rods in ptosis patients with poor Bell’s phenomenon. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2017;7(3):143–148. doi:10.4103/tjo.tjo_36_17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenwald D, Shumway S, Albear P, Gottlieb L. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation. J Surg Res. 1994;56(4):372–377. doi:10.1006/jsre.1994.1058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris CL, Buckley EG, Enyedi LB, Stinnett S, Freedman SE. Safety and efficacy of silicone rod frontalis suspension surgery for childhood ptosis repair. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2008;45(5):280–288. doi:10.3928/01913913-20080901-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MJ, Oh JY, Choung HK, Kim NJ, Sung MS, Khwarg SI. Frontalis sling operation using silicone rod compared with preserved fascia lata for congenital ptosis a three-year follow-up study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(1):123–129. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter SR, Meecham WJ, Seiff SR. Silicone frontalis slings for the correction of blepharoptosis: indications and efficacy. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(4):623–630. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30643-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttanri IB, Serin D, Karslioglu S, Akbaba M, Ari S, Fazil K. Effect of suturing the silicone rod to the tarsal plate and the suture material used on success of frontalis suspension surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29(2):98–100. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e31827a0068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvi SA, Gupta Y, Yousuf S. Evaluation of safety and efficacy of silicone rod in tarsofrontalis sling surgery for severe congenital ptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30(1):11–14. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3182a74f44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari A, Weaver DT, Goldblum TA, Silbert D, Lopez SP, Matta N. Pediatric frontalis suspension with braided polyester: a comparison of two techniques. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2018;55(4):229–233. doi:10.3928/01913913-20180213-02
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj MS, Sastry SS, Ghose S, Betharia SM, Pushker N. Evaluation of polytetrafluoroethylene suture for frontalis suspension as compared to polybutylate-coated braided polyester. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32(4):415–419. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00818.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postlethwait RW. Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures. Ann Surg. 1970;171(6):892–898. doi:10.1097/00000658-197006010-00010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setzen G, Williams EF. Tissue response to suture materials implanted subcutaneously in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1788–1795. doi:10.1097/00006534-199712000-00023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar