Optimization of Phacoemulsification Tip Gauge on the Oertli CataRhex3 in an in vitro Setting

References

• Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(9):e888–e897. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30293-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World report on vision. licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Geneva, Switzerland; 2019. Available from: www.who.int/publications-detail/world-report-on-vision. Accessed December 20, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1221–e1234. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Burden of Disease 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e130–e143. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabin G, Chen M, Espandar L. Cataract surgery for the developing world. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(1):55–59. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f154bd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menapace R. [Developments in modern cataract surgery - a critical overview]. Ther Umsch. 2016;73(2):53–59. German. doi:10.1024/0040-5930/a000756
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bernhisel A, Pettey J. Manual small incision cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020;31(1):74–79. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertli. Making the difference in eye surgery. Berneck, Switzerland: Oertli Instrumente; 2021. Available from: https://www.oertli-instruments.com/en-us. Accessed December 20, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Stutz LA, Heczko JB, Bird BA, et al. Optimization of the Oertli CataRhex 3 phacoemulsification machine. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:633–639. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S196281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird BA, Thomson RS, Stutz LA, et al. Effect of increasing flow when grooving during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(5):623–626. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner AD, Wright AJ, Ta BT, et al. Optimum on-time duty cycle for a transversal ultrasound machine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(9):1140–1143. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.03.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulter T, Jensen JD, Christensen MD, et al. Comparison of a torsional and a standard tip with a monitored forced infusion phacoemulsification system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(4):613–617. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulter T, Christensen MD, Jensen JD, et al. Optimization and comparison of a 0.7 mm tip with the 0.9 mm tip on an active-fluidics phacoemulsification platform. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(12):1591–1595. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahoon JM, Gupta I, Gardiner G, et al. Comparison of venturi and peristaltic vacuum in phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):428–432. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMill DL, Zaugg BE, Pettey JH, et al. Objective comparison of 4 nonlongitudinal ultrasound modalities regarding efficiency and chatter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(6):1065–1071. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.12.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farukhi AM, Stagg BC, Ronquillo C Jr, et al. Effect of phaco tip diameter on efficiency and chatter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(5):811–817. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner GL, Garff K, Gupta I, et al. Effect of pulsing ultrasound on phacoemulsification efficiency. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(11):2560–2564. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garff K, Jensen JD, Cahoon J, et al. Impact of micropulsed ultrasound power settings on the efficiency and chatter associated with lens-fragment removal. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(6):1264–1267. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta I, Cahoon JM, Gardiner G, et al. Effect of increased vacuum and aspiration rates on phacoemulsification efficiency. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(4):836–841. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta I, Zaugg B, Stagg BC, et al. Phacoemulsification efficiency with a radiused phaco tip. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(5):818–821. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.11.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, Kirk KR, Gupta I, et al. Determining optimal ultrasound off time with micropulse longitudinal phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(2):433–436. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.12.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JD, Shi DS, Robinson MS, et al. Torsional power study using CENTURION phacoemulsification technology. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;44(8):710–713. doi:10.1111/ceo.12748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha L, Wright A, Wright DD, et al. High vacuum and aspiration on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter for Centurion. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(1):136–138. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbara SW, Heczko J, Ta B, et al. Determining optimal ultrasound percent on time with long-pulse torsional phacoemulsification. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(3):395–398. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbara S, Heczko JB, Bernhisel AA, et al. Effect of high vacuum and aspiration on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter using a transversal ultrasound machine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(11):1378–1383. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbara SW, Heczko J, Ta B, et al. Impact of torsional micropulse on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter. Can J Ophthalmol. 2019;54(5):560–564. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk KR, Ronquillo C Jr, Jensen JD, et al. Optimum on-time duty cycle for micropulse technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(9):1545–1548. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.02.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquillo CC Jr, Zaugg B, Stagg B, et al. Determining optimal torsional ultrasound power for cataract surgery with automatic longitudinal pulses at maximum vacuum ex vivo. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158(6):1262–1266.e1262. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.08.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi DS, Jensen JD, Kramer GD, et al. Comparison of vacuum and aspiration on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter using a monitored forced infusion system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:162–167. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg BC, Gupta I, Cahoon J, et al. Bent versus straight tips in micropulsed longitudinal phacoemulsification. Can J Ophthalmol. 2015;50(5):354–359. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2015.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright AJ, Bohner AD, Bernhisel AA, et al. The effect of pulsing on transverse ultrasound efficiency and chatter. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:107–110. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright AJ, Thomson RS, Bernhisel AA, et al. Effect of chamber stabilization software on efficiency and chatter in a porcine lens model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(11):1464–1467. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DD, Wright AJ, Boulter TD, et al. Optimization of transversal phacoemulsification settings in peristaltic mode using a new transversal ultrasound machine. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(9):1202–1206. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.06.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhisel AA, Cahoon JM, Sella R, et al. Optimum on-time and off-time combinations for micropulse phacoemulsification in venturi vacuum mode. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(12):1797–1800. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner A, Peterson JS, Wright AJ, et al. Effects on phacoemulsification efficiency and chatter at variable longitudinal ultrasound settings when combined with constant torsional energy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(5):774–777. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramshekar A, Heczko J, Bernhisel A, et al. Optimizing tip diameter in phacoemulsification of varying lens sizes: an in vitro study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:4475–4484. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S333903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson RS, Bird BA, Stutz LA, et al. The effect of increasing power when grooving using phacoemulsification. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:611–615. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S194731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakey ZB, Jensen JD, Zaugg BE, Radmall BR, Pettey JH, Olson RJ. Porcine lens nuclei as a model for comparison of 3 ultrasound modalities regarding efficiency and chatter. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(8):1248–1253. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menapace R. Mini- and micro-incision cataract surgery: a critical review of current technologies. Eur Ophth Rev. 2009;3(2):52–57. doi:10.17925/EOR.2009.03.02.52
   Google Scholar
• Kruger AJ, Schauersberger J, Abela-Formanek C, et al. [Effect of duration of phacoemulsification on postoperative inflammation–a retrospective study]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218(4):204–208. German. doi:10.1055/s-2001-14914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar