Correlation Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Photopic Negative Response of Flash Electroretinography in Ganglion Cell Complex Assessment in Glaucoma Patients

References

• Agarwal R, Gupta S, Agarwal P, Saxena R, Agrawal S. Current concepts in the pathophysiology of glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009;57(4):257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucy KA, Wollstein G. Structural and Functional Evaluations for the Early Detection of Glaucoma. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2016;11(5):367–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denniss J, Turpin A, Mckendrick AM. Relating optical coherence tomography to visual fields in glaucoma: structure–function mapping, limitations and future applications. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(3):291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidalgo BMR, Crabb DP, Lawrenson JG. Methodology and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies of automated perimetry in glaucoma: evaluation using a standardised approach. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(3):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwerth RS, Wheat JL, Fredette MJ, Anderson DR. Linking structure and function in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29(4):249–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Bowd C, Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. The Structure and Function Relationship in Glaucoma: implications for Detection of Progression and Measurement of Rates of Change. Investig Opthalmology Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):6939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp AS, Weinreb RN. Will Perimetry Be Performed to Monitor Glaucoma in 2025? Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):S71–S75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phu J, Khuu SK, Yapp M, Assaad N, Hennessy MP, Kalloniatis M. The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100(4):313–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham AJ, Medeiros FA. Detecting Structural Progression in Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(12):S57–S65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frishman L, Sustar M, Kremers J, et al. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 2018;136(3):207–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prencipe M, Perossini T, Brancoli G, Perossini M. The photopic negative response (PhNR): measurement approaches and utility in glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(12):3565–3576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RRA, Jahanbakhsh K, Boden C, et al. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(6):908–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Patella VM, Bengtsson B. The Field Analyzer Primer: Effective Perimetry. 4th ed. Dublin, CA: Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brusini P, Johnson CA. Staging Functional Damage in Glaucoma: review of Different Classification Methods. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007;52(2):156–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita Y, Hollό G, Kita R, Horie D, Inoue M, Hirakata A. Differences of Intrasession Reproducibility of Circumpapillary Total Retinal Thickness and Circumpapillary Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements Made with the RS-3000 Optical Coherence Tomograph. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch DL, Marmor MF, Brigell MG, et al. ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2015;130(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo EU, Schiffman JS, Bahrani HM, Tang RA. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(10):3827–3837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Walters JW. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(2):514–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvenkel B, Sustar M, Perovšek D. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Doc Ophthalmol. 2017;135(1):17–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen X, Huang L, Fan N, He J. Relationship among Photopic Negative Response, Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness, and Visual Field between Normal and POAG Eyes. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkiewicz M, Lubiński W, Penkala K. Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Doc Ophthalmol. 2016;132(1):57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara Y, Machida S, Ebihara S, Ishizuka M, Tada A, Nishimura T. Comparisons of photopic negative responses elicited by different conditions from glaucomatous eyes. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020;64(2):114–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida S, Gotoh Y, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(5):2201–2207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida S, Toba Y, Ohtaki A, Gotoh Y, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Photopic negative response of focal electoretinograms in glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(12):5636–5644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamada K, MacHida S, Oikawa T, Miyamoto H, Nishimura T, Kurosaka D. Correlation between photopic negative response of focal electroretinograms and local loss of retinal neurons in glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2010;35(2):155–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Hangai M, Mori S, Hirose F, Yoshimura N. Hemispherical focal macular photopic negative response and macular inner retinal thickness in open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(3):7645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser D, Lagrèze WA, Bach M, Poloschek CM. Photopic negative response versus pattern electroretinogram in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(2):1182–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cursiefen C, Korth M, Horn FK. The negative response of the flash electroretinogram in glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol. 2001;103(1):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaneko M, Machida S, Hoshi Y, Kurosaka D. Alterations of Photopic Negative Response of Multifocal Electroretinogram in Patients with Glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(1):77–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida S, Kaneko M, Kurosaka D. Regional Variations in Correlation between Photopic Negative Response of Focal Electoretinograms and Ganglion Cell Complex in Glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2015;40(4):439–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar