Scleral Buckling: A Look at the Past, Present and Future in View of Recent Findings on the Importance of Photoreceptor Re-Alignment Following Retinal Re-Attachment

References

• Li JQ, Welchowski T, Schmid M, et al. Incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Europe - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmologica. 2019;242(2):81–86. doi:10.1159/000499489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, et al. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(6):678–684. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.157727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen BR, Alberti M, Bjerrum SS, la Cour M. The incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is increasing. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(6):603–606. doi:10.1111/aos.14380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY, Byun SJ, Woo SJ, et al. Increasing trend in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Korea from 2004 to 2015. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):406. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-02157-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen R, Haarman AEG, van de Put MAJ, et al. Association of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment incidence with myopia prevalence in the Netherlands. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(1):85–92. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achour H, Thomseth VM, Kvaloy JT, et al. Substantial increase in the incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Western Norway over 20 years. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022. doi:10.1111/aos.15119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CY, Mikowski M, Wu L. Pneumatic retinopexy: an update. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021:1–2. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05448-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971;75(4):813–820.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kasner D, Miller GR, Taylor WH, et al. Surgical treatment of amyloidosis of the vitreous. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1968;72(3):410–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machemer R. A new concept for vitreous surgery. 2. Surgical technique and complications. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;74(6):1022–1033. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(72)90719-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer R. A new concept for vitreous surgery. 7. Two instrument techniques in pars plana vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;92(5):407–412. doi:10.1001/archopht.1974.01010010419009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machemer R. A new concept for vitreous surgery. 6. Anesthesia and improvements in surgical techniques. Arch Ophthalmol. 1974;92(5):402–406. doi:10.1001/archopht.1974.01010010414008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machemer R, Buettner H, Parel JM. Vitrectomy, a pars plana approach. Instrumentation. Mod Probl Ophthalmol. 1972;10:172–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machemer R, Norton EW. Vitrectomy, a pars plana approach. II. Clinical experience. Mod Probl Ophthalmol. 1972;10:178–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Machemer R, Norton EW. A new concept for vitreous surgery. 3. Indications and results. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;74(6):1034–1056. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(72)90720-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer R, Parel JM, Buettner H. A new concept for vitreous surgery. I. Instrumentation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1972;73(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(72)90295-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SS, Ahmed I, Gonzales A, et al. Management of uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: a comparison of practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a real-world setting. Eye. 2022. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02028-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosh K, Francisconi CLM, Qian J, et al. Retinal displacement following pneumatic retinopexy vs pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(6):652–659. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahvash A, Marafon SB, Juncal VR, et al. Understanding the mechanism of retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: a computer simulation model. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021. doi:10.1111/aos.15050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahvash A, Marafon SB, Juncal VR, et al. Impact of tamponade agent on retinal displacement following pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: a computer simulation model. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022. doi:10.1111/aos.15118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francisconi CLM, Marafon SB, Figueiredo NA, et al. Retinal displacement after pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (ALIGN). Ophthalmology. 2021:129(4):458–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WW, Ramachandran A, Hamli H, et al. Immediate subretinal fluid displacement from the buoyant force of a small gas bubble in pneumatic retinopexy: insights into the potential mechanism of retinal displacement following retinal detachment repair. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2021. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000001187
   Google Scholar
• Mason RH, Minaker SA, Marafon SB, et al. Retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022;67(4):950–964. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muni RH, Felfeli T, Sadda SR, et al. Postoperative photoreceptor integrity following pneumatic retinopexy vs pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment repair: a post hoc optical coherence tomography analysis from the pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(6):620–627. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muni RH, Francisconi CLM, Felfeli T, et al. Vision-Related Functioning in Patients Undergoing pneumatic retinopexy vs vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a post hoc exploratory analysis of the PIVOT randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(8):826–833. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohowetz LJ, Shaheen AR, Russell JF, et al. Evaluation of retinal displacement following primary scleral buckling for macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2022. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong DY, Fuller DG. The declining use of scleral buckling with vitrectomy for primary retinal detachments. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(9):1206–1207. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starr MR, Hsu J, Yonekawa Y, et al. Surgical techniques for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments between surgeons with high versus low single surgery success rates. Acta Ophthalmol. 2021;99(8):e1501–e8. doi:10.1111/aos.14821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer R. The importance of fluid absorption, traction, intraocular currents, and chorioretinal scars in the therapy of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. XLI Edward Jackson memorial lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1984;98(6):681–693. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(84)90682-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong D, Chan YK, Bek T, et al. Intraocular currents, Bernoulli’s principle and non-drainage scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eye. 2018;32(2):213–221. doi:10.1038/eye.2017.312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonin J. Le Décollement de la Rétine. Pathogenié. Traitement. Lausanne: Librairie Payot & Cia Lausanne; 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Vail DT. An inquiry into results of the established treatment of detachment of the retina and a new theory. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1912;17:29.
   Google Scholar
• Report of committee on detachment of the retina. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1916;36:352.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger TJ. Jules Gonin. Pioneer of retinal detachment surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51(4):303–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gloor BP, Marmor MF. Controversy over the etiology and therapy of retinal detachment: the struggles of Jules Gonin. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(2):184–195. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne PJ. One hundred years of retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(10):1309–1311. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson S. Electro-endothermy in detachment of the retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1932;7(5):661–680. doi:10.1001/archopht.1932.00820120011001
   Google Scholar
• Pischel DK. Diathermy operation for retinal detachment; comparative results of different types of electrodes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1944;42:543–567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson CP, Rice TA. History of retinal detachment surgery. In: Michels Retinal Detachment. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO, USA: Mosby; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Jess A. Temporare Skleraleindellung als Hilfsmittel bei der Operation der Neetzhautablösung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheillkd. 1937;99:318.
   Google Scholar
• Custodis E. Die Behandlung der Netzhautablösung durch umschriebene Diathermiekoagulation und einer mittels Plombenaufnähung erzeugten Eindellung der Sklera im Bereich des Risses. [Treatment of retinal detachment by circumscribed diathermy coagulation and indentation of the sclera in the area of the tear]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheillkd. 1956;129:476–495.
   Google Scholar
• Schepens CL, Okamura ID, Brockhurst RJ. The scleral buckling procedures. I. Surgical techniques and management. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1957;58(6):797–811. doi:10.1001/archopht.1957.00940010819003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoff HA, Baras I, McLean J. Modifications to the custodis procedure for retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1965;73(2):160–163. doi:10.1001/archopht.1965.00970030162004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rezaei KA, Abrams GW. The history of retinal detachment surgery. In: Kreissig I, editor. Primary Retinal Detachment: Options for Repair. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoff H, Kreissig I. The treatment of retinal detachment without drainage of subretinal fluid. (Modifications of the Custodis procedure. VI). Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972;76(5):1121–1133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoff HA, Nano H. A new needle for scleral surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965;60(1):146–148. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(65)92414-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoff H, Gieser R. Finding the retinal hole. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85(5):565–569. doi:10.1001/archopht.1971.00990050567007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonnet M. Microsurgery for retinal detachment repair. Dev Ophthalmol. 1987;14:5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nawrocki J, Michalewska Z, Michalewski J. Optic Fibre Free Intravitreal Surgical System (OFFISS) in retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008;39(6):466–470. doi:10.3928/15428877-20081101-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aras C, Ucar D, Koytak A, Yetik H. Scleral buckling with a non-contact wide-angle viewing system. Ophthalmologica. 2012;227(2):107–110. doi:10.1159/000333101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalam KV, Shah VA. Optics of wide-angle panoramic viewing system-assisted vitreous surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004;49(4):437–445. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagpal M, Bhardwaj S, Mehrotra N. Scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using vitrectomy-based visualization systems and chandelier illumination. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2013;2(3):165–168. doi:10.1097/APO.0b013e3182929b75
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roca JA, Maia M, da Cruz NFS, et al. Non-contact wide-angled visualization with chandelier-assisted scleral buckling for primary uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(9):1857–1861. doi:10.1007/s00417-020-04737-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Si S, Xu K, et al. Outcomes of scleral buckling using chandelier endoillumination. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(6):591–594. doi:10.1111/aos.13326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai H, Tagami M, Azumi A. Scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using noncontact wide-angle viewing system with a cannula-based 25 G chandelier endoilluminator. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:2103–2107. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S91339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon GS, Han JR. Effectiveness of scleral buckling with a wide-field surgical microscope and chandelier illumination in retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmologica. 2019;242(1):31–37. doi:10.1159/000496165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita M, Kusaka M, Yamada H, Hama S. Updated chandelier illumination-assisted scleral buckling using 3D visualization system. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1743–1748. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S218975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan R, Tyagi M, Hussein A, et al. Scleral buckling with wide-angled endoillumination as a surgical educational tool. Retina. 2016;36(4):830–833. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nossair AA, Ewais WA, Eissa SA. Chandelier-assisted scleral buckling using wide angle viewing contact lens for pseudophakic retinal detachment repair. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(4):627–633. doi:10.18240/ijo.2019.04.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seider MI, Nomides RE, Hahn P, et al. Scleral buckling with chandelier illumination. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016;11(3):304–309. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.188402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomita Y, Kurihara T, Uchida A, et al. Wide-angle viewing system versus conventional indirect ophthalmoscopy for scleral buckling. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):13256. doi:10.1038/srep13256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Rosenblatt A, Bornstein S, et al. Wide-angled endoillumination vs traditional scleral buckling surgery for retinal detachment - a comparative study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:287–293. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S182751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporossi T, Finocchio L, Barca F, et al. Scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using a noncontact wide-angle viewing system with a cannula-based 27-G Chandelier endoilluminator. Retina. 2019;39(Suppl 1):S144–S50. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Yang XP, Lyu XB. Comparison of scleral buckling using wide-angle viewing systems and indirect ophthalmoscope for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(9):1310–1314. doi:10.18240/ijo.2016.09.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao T, Yan Y, Chen Y, et al. Endo-illumination-aided scleral buckling combined with intravitreal injection of hyaluronate for treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica. 2020;243(4):316–322. doi:10.1159/000504714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albalkini AS, Abdullatif AM, Albalkini MS, et al. Chandelier-assisted versus standard scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a randomized clinical study. Retina. 2022. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000003519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawankule PK, Narnaware SH, Chakraborty M, et al. Digitally assisted three-dimensional surgery - beyond vitreous. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69(7):1793–1800. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_3111_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Spina C, Del Turco C, Bogetto C, et al. Wide-angle 3D viewing system with valved trocar applied to chandelier-assisted scleral buckling. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31(2):804–806. doi:10.1177/1120672120945091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Wang L, Wei Y, et al. The preliminary experiences with three-dimensional heads-up display viewing system for vitreoretinal surgery under various status. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(1):102–109. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1526305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckardt C, Paulo EB. Heads-up surgery for vitreoretinal procedures: an experimental and clinical study. Retina. 2016;36(1):137–147. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman WR, Chen KC, Ho J, et al. Resolution, depth of field, and physician satisfaction during digitally assisted vitreoretinal surgery. Retina. 2019;39(9):1768–1771. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000002236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlAkeely AG, Alageely A, Alageely O. Heads up sutureless chandelier assisted scleral buckle. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2020;20:100900. doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2020.100900
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michels RG. Scleral buckling methods for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 1986;6(1):1–49. doi:10.1097/00006982-198600610-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yannuzzi NA, Patel NA, Berrocal AM, Sridhar J. Encircling scleral buckle with chandelier endoillumination and endolaser for repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:609–612. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S238241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoff H. The rationale for radial buckling. Mod Probl Ophthalmol. 1974;12:484–491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoff H. Radial buckling in the repair of retinal detachment. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1976;16(1):127–134. doi:10.1097/00004397-197601610-00012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoff H, Kreissig I. Advantages of radial buckling. Am J Ophthalmol. 1975;79(6):955–957. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(75)90677-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreissig I, Simader E, Fahle M, Lincoff H. Visual acuity after segmental buckling and non-drainage: a 15-year follow-up. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1995;5(4):240–246. doi:10.1177/112067219500500408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton EW. Retinal detachment in Aphakia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964;58:111–124. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(64)90600-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankamah E, Siemerink MJ, Polkinghorne PJ, et al. Internal drainage of subretinal fluid during chandelier-assisted scleral buckling. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2022;16(1):77–80. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000000921
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammer ME, Burch TG, Rinder D. Viscosity of subretinal fluid and its clinical correlations. Retina. 1986;6(4):234–238. doi:10.1097/00006982-198606040-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton GF, Grizzard WS, Avins LR, Heilbron DC. The drainage of subretinal fluid: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Retina. 1981;1(4):271–280. doi:10.1097/00006982-198101040-00002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson CP, Bradford RH Jr. Complications of draining subretinal fluid. Retina. 1984;4(1):1–4. doi:10.1097/00006982-198400410-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamura JD, Schepens CL, Brockhurst RJ, et al. Scleral buckling procedures. IX. Complications during operation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;75(5):615–625. doi:10.1001/archopht.1966.00970050617006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• English JF, Barry R, Essex RW. Postoperative endophthalmitis following chandelier-assisted scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(1):e130–e1. doi:10.1111/aos.13764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakono T, Otsuka H, Shiihara H, et al. Acute bacterial endophthalmitis after scleral buckling surgery with chandelier endoillumination. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2017;8:7–10. doi:10.1016/j.ajoc.2017.07.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papakostas TD, Vavvas D. Postoperative complications of scleral buckling. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(1):70–74. doi:10.1080/08820538.2017.1353816
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velez FG. A 2020 update on 20/20 X 2 diplopia after ocular surgery: strabismus following retinal detachment surgery. J Binocul Vis Ocul Motil. 2021;71(4):132–137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ung T, Comer MB, Ang AJ, et al. Clinical features and surgical management of retinal detachment secondary to round retinal holes. Eye. 2005;19(6):665–669. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy CJ, Parker CE, McAllister IL. Retinal detachment caused by retinal dialysis. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25(1):25–30. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.1997.tb01271.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinyoun JL, Knobloch WH. Idiopathic retinal dialysis. Retina. 1984;4(1):9–14. doi:10.1097/00006982-198400410-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander DA, Irvine AR, Poothullil AM, Bhisitkul RB. Distinguishing features of nontraumatic and traumatic retinal dialyses. Retina. 2004;24(5):669–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiddy WE, Green WR. Retinal dialysis: pathology and pathogenesis. Retina. 1982;2(2):94–116. doi:10.1097/00006982-198200220-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JS, Marra K, Flynn HW Jr., et al. Scleral buckling in the treatment of retinal detachment due to retinal dialysis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47(4):336–340. doi:10.3928/23258160-20160324-06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiang Kwong T, Shunmugam M, Williamson TH. Characteristics of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments secondary to retinal dialyses. Can J Ophthalmol. 2014;49(2):196–199. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan S, Hussain Z, Khan U, et al. Retinal detachment due to retinal dialysis: surgical outcome after scleral buckling. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2015;4(5):259–262. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muni RH, Bansal A, Lee WW, Escaf LC. Minimal gas vitrectomy with scleral buckle to minimize retinal displacement in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior breaks. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2021. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000001174
   Google Scholar
• Muni RH, Felfeli T, Figueiredo N, et al. Minimal gas vitrectomy technique for reducing risk of retinal displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2020. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000001076
   Google Scholar
• Popovic MM, Muni RH, Nichani P, Kertes PJ. Pars plana vitrectomy, scleral buckle, and pneumatic retinopexy for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022;67(1):184–196. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhoot AS, Popovic MM, Nichani PAH, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle: a comprehensive meta-analysis of 15,947 eyes. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;67(4):932–949. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshtiaghi A, Dhoot AS, Mihalache A, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy with and without supplemental scleral buckle for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2022.02.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sena DF, Kilian R, Liu SH, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021:11):CD008350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves MR, Afshar AR, Pershing S. Need for retinal detachment reoperation based on primary repair method among commercially insured patients, 2003–2016. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;229:71–81. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee TAoUPoOAfc. Surgical retinal fellow volume registry; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph DP, Ryan EH, Ryan CM, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study: pseudophakic retinal detachment outcomes: primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 3. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(11):1507–1514. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan EH, Ryan CM, Forbes NJ, et al. Primary retinal detachment outcomes study report number 2: phakic retinal detachment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(8):1077–1085. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier RJ, Felfeli T, Berger AR, et al. The pneumatic retinopexy versus vitrectomy for the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment outcomes randomized trial (PIVOT). Ophthalmology. 2019;126(4):531–539. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muni RH, Minaker SA, Mason RH, et al. Novel classification system for management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with minimally invasive detachment surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials focused on patient-centred outcomes. Can J Ophthalmol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Ng H, Vermeer KA, van Meurs JC, La Heij EC. Visual acuity inadequately reflects vision-related quality of life in patients after macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(10):34. doi:10.1167/iovs.61.10.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, et al. Aniseikonia and foveal microstructure after retinal detachment surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(8):4880. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami T, Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, et al. Changes in aniseikonia and influencing-factors following successful macula-off retinal detachment surgery. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):11588. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48112-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama H, Ishikawa H, Komuku Y, et al. Comparative analysis of metamorphopsia and aniseikonia after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane, macular hole, or rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232758. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0232758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Put MA, Vehof J, Hooymans JM, Los LI. Postoperative metamorphopsia in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: associations with visual function, vision related quality of life, and optical coherence tomography findings. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0120543. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lina G, Xuemin Q, Qinmei W, Lijun S. Vision-related quality of life, metamorphopsia, and stereopsis after successful surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eye. 2016;30(1):40–45. doi:10.1038/eye.2015.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, et al. Metamorphopsia and optical coherence tomography findings after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(1):214–20 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Lin Q, Chen F. Prevalence and predictors of metamorphopsia after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: a cross-sectional, comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(6):725–729. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuda T, Higashide T, Sugiyama K. Metamorphopsia and outer retinal morphologic changes after successful vitrectomy surgery for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2018;38(1):148–154. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000001510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh M, Gauthier AS, Delbosc B, Castelbou M. Impact of metamorphopsia on quality of life after successful retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmologica. 2018;240(3):121–128. doi:10.1159/000486164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E, Williamson TH, Hysi P, et al. Macular displacement following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(10):1297–1302. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo N, Sarraf D, Gunnemann F, et al. Longitudinal assessment of ellipsoid zone recovery using en face optical coherence tomography after retinal detachment repair. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;236:212–220. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WW, Bansal A, Sadda SR, et al. Outer retinal folds after pars plana vitrectomy vs. pneumatic retinopexy for retinal detachment repair: post hoc analysis from PIVOT. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;6(3):234–242. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2021.09.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dell’Omo R, Mura M, Lesnik Oberstein SY, et al. Early simultaneous fundus autofluorescence and optical coherence tomography features after pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2012;32(4):719–728. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31822c293e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casswell EJ, Yorston D, Lee E, et al. Effect of face-down positioning vs support-the-break positioning after macula-involving retinal detachment repair: the PostRD randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020;138(6):634–642. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiragami C, Shiraga F, Yamaji H, et al. Unintentional displacement of the retina after standard vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(1):86–92 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dell’Omo R, Semeraro F, Guerra G, et al. Short-time prone posturing is well-tolerated and reduces the rate of unintentional retinal displacement in elderly patients operated on for retinal detachment. BMC Surg. 2013;13(Suppl 2):S55. doi:10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiragami C, Fukuda K, Yamaji H, et al. A method to decrease the frequency of unintentional slippage after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2015;35(4):758–763. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dell’Omo R, Scupola A, Viggiano D, et al. Incidence and factors influencing retinal displacement in eyes treated for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with vitrectomy and gas or silicone oil. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(6):BIO191–BIO9. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-21466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codenotti M, Fogliato G, Iuliano L, et al. Influence of intraocular tamponade on unintentional retinal displacement after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2013;33(2):349–355. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e318263d180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schocket LS, Witkin AJ, Fujimoto JG, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography in patients with decreased visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(4):666–672. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AJ, Telander DG, Zawadzki RJ, et al. High-resolution Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetric findings after macula-off retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):1923–1929. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakanishi H, Hangai M, Unoki N, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of the detached macula in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2009;29(2):232–242. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31818bcd30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai WW, Leung GY, Chan CW, et al. Simultaneous spectral domain OCT and fundus autofluorescence imaging of the macula and microperimetric correspondence after successful repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(3):311–318. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.163584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharbiya M, Grandinetti F, Scavella V, et al. Correlation between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings and visual outcome after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina. 2012;32(1):43–53. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182180114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi M, Iwase T, Yamamoto K, et al. Association between photoreceptor regeneration and visual acuity following surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(3):889–898. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-18403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham JR, Srivastava SK, Reese JL, Ehlers JP. Intraoperative OCT features and postoperative ellipsoid mapping in primary macula-involving retinal detachments from the PIONEER study. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019;3(3):252–257. doi:10.1016/j.oret.2018.10.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benson SE, Schlottmann PG, Bunce C, et al. Optical coherence tomography analysis of the macula after vitrectomy surgery for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology. 2006;113(7):1179–1183. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch JM, Van Loo JA Jr., Okun E. Realignment of photoreceptors disturbed in orientation secondary to retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol. 1973;12(11):849–853.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar