231
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1623-1637 | Published online: 27 May 2022

References

  • Wang YX, Xu L, Wei WB, Jonas JB. Intraocular pressure and its normal range adjusted for ocular and systemic parameters. The Beijing Eye Study 2011. PLoS One. 2018;13(5). doi:10.1371/Journal.Pone.0196926
  • Yolcu U, Ilhan A, Tas A. Conventional intraocular pressure measurement techniques. In: wound healing - new insights into ancient challenges. Intech. 2016. doi:10.5772/64611
  • Aziz K, Friedman DS. Tonometers - which one should I use? Eye. 2018;32(5):931–937. doi:10.1038/S41433-018-0040-4
  • Singh P. Tonometry: an overview. Vol 13; 2014. Available from: Www.Iosrjournals.Orgwww.Iosrjournals.Org. Accessed May 19, 2022.
  • Messenio D, Ferroni M, Boschetti F. Goldmann tonometry and corneal biomechanics. Appl Sci. 2021;11(9):4025. doi:10.3390/App11094025
  • Kozobolis V, Konstantinidis A, Sideroudi H, Labiris G. The effect of corneal refractive surgery on glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1–8. doi:10.1155/2017/8914623
  • Konstantinidis A, Panagiotopoulou E-K, Panos GD, Sideroudi H, Mehmet A, Labiris G. The effect of antiglaucoma procedures (trabeculectomy vs. ex-PRESS glaucoma drainage implant) on the corneal biomechanical properties. J Clin Med. 2021;10(4):802. doi:10.3390/Jcm10040802
  • Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31(1):146–155. doi:10.1016/J.Jcrs.2004.09.031
  • Whitacre MM, Stein R. Major review sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Survey Ophthalmol. 1993;38:1–30. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(93)90053-a
  • Sosuan GMN, Yap-Veloso MIR. Central corneal thickness among Filipino patients in an ambulatory eye surgery center using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2653–2664. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S320281
  • Francis BA, Varma R, Chopra V, Lai MY, Shtir C, Azen SP. Intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, and prevalence of open-angle glaucoma: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146(5):741–746. doi:10.1016/J.Ajo.2008.05.048
  • Lleo A, Marcos A, Calatayud M, Alonso L, Rahhal SM, Sanchis-Gimeno JA. The relationship between central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Exp Optometry. 2003;86:104–108. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2003.tb03068.x
  • Stodtmeister R. Applanation tonometry and correction according to corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. 1998;76:319–324. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0420.1998.760313.x
  • Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;53(1):34–43. doi:10.1111/J.1755-3768.1975.Tb01135.X
  • Gunvant P, James O’leary D, Baskaran M, Broadway DC, Watkins RJ, Vijaya L. Evaluation of tonometric correction factors. J Glaucoma. 2005;14:337–343. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000176940.81799.33
  • Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J, Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J. Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings. Vol 85; 2001. Available from: Www.Bjophthalmol.Com. Accessed May 19, 2022.
  • De Bernardo M, Cembalo G, Rosa N. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry after refractive surgery: a review of different correction formulas. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2783–2788. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S263856
  • Shortt AJ, Allan BDS, Evans JR. Laser-Assisted In-Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Versus Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(1). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005135.Pub3
  • Schallhorn JM, Schallhorn SC, Ou Y. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic lasik and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study. In: Ophthalmology. Vol. 122. Elsevier Inc.; 2015:471–479. doi:10.1016/J.Ophtha.2014.09.033
  • Helmy H, Hashem O. Intraocular pressure calculation in myopic patients after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:509–516. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S239329
  • Svedberg H, Chen E, Hamberg-Nyström H. Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243(12):1218–1220. doi:10.1007/S00417-005-0072-X
  • McCafferty SJ, Tetrault K, Mccolgin A, Chue W, Levine J, Muller M. modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(12):1840–1844. doi:10.1136/Bjophthalmol-2018-313470
  • McCafferty S, Tetrault K, Mccolgin A, Chue W, Levine J, Muller M. Intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and repeatability of a modified Goldmann prism: multicenter randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;196:145–153. doi:10.1016/J.Ajo.2018.08.051
  • McCafferty SJ, Enikov ET, Schwiegerling J, Ashley SM. Goldmann tonometry tear film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:71–78. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S152492
  • McCafferty S, Lim G, Duncan W, et al. Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:835–840. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S135272
  • McCafferty S, Lim G, Duncan W, Enikov E, Schwiegerling J. Goldmann tonometer prism with an optimized error correcting applanation surface. Transl Vision Sci Technol. 2016;5(5). doi:10.1167/Tvst.5.5.4
  • Bao FJ, Huang ZX, Huang JH, et al. Clinical evaluation of methods to correct intraocular pressure measurements by the Goldmann applanation tonometer, ocular response analyzer, and corvis ST tonometer for the effects of corneal stiffness parameters. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(6):510–519. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000359
  • Chen KJ, Joda A, Vinciguerra R, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44(5):581–588. doi:10.1016/J.Jcrs.2018.01.023
  • Lee H, Roberts CJ, Kim TI, Ambrósio R, Elsheikh A, Yong Kang DS. Changes in biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure and dynamic corneal response parameters before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and femtosecond laser–assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(12):1495–1503. doi:10.1016/J.Jcrs.2017.08.019
  • Chen S, Lopes BT, Huang W, et al. Effectiveness of 4 tonometers in measuring IOP after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK, SMILE, and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(7):967–974. doi:10.1097/J.Jcrs.0000000000000204
  • Bao F, Huang W, Zhu R, et al. Effectiveness of the Goldmann applanation tonometer, the dynamic contour tonometer, the ocular response analyzer and the corvis ST in measuring intraocular pressure following FS-LASIK. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(2):144–152. doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1660794
  • Joda AA, Shervin MMS, Kook D, Elsheikh A. Development and validation of a correction equation for corvis tonometry. Comput Methods Biomechan Biomed Eng. 2015;19(9):943–953. doi:10.1080/10255842.2015.1077515
  • Vinciguerra R, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, et al. Influence of pachymetry and intraocular pressure on dynamic corneal response parameters in healthy patients. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(8):550–561. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20160524-01
  • Salouti R, Bagheri M, Shamsi A, Zamani M, Ghoreyshi M, Hossein Nowroozzadeh M. Corneal parameters in healthy subjects assessed by corvis ST. J Ophthal Vision Res. 2020;15(1):24–31. doi:10.18502/Jovr.V15i1.5936
  • Margarita Lat-Luna ML, Guerrero PI. Correlation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry among Filipinos. Ophthalmology. 2004;29:79–82.
  • Stevens S. Nurse advisor to the community eye. Health J. 2007;20:44–45.
  • Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Eye. 2009;23(2):262–269. doi:10.1038/Sj.Eye.6703102
  • Shafiq I. Influence of Central Corneal Thickness (CCT) on Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) in normal individuals. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2008;24:89.
  • Margarita Lat-Luna ML, Guerrero PI, Vincent Policarpio Flores JD, Epi M, Margarita Lat-Luna M. Correlation of central corneal thickness and Goldmann applanation tonometry among Filipinos. Ophthalmology. 2004;29:79–82.
  • Marjanović I, Kontić D, Hentova-Senćanić P, Marković V, Božić M. Correlation between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in various age groups. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010;138(5–6):279–286. doi:10.2298/SARH1006279M
  • Kyei S, Assiamah F, Kwarteng MA, Gboglu CP. The association of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measures by non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry among glaucoma patients. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(6):999–1004. doi:10.4314/Ejhs.V30i6.18
  • Mark HH. Corneal curvature in applanation tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;76(2):223–224. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(73)90164-5
  • Gunvant P, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, et al. Effect of corned parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(4):518–522. doi:10.1136/Bjo.2003.019331
  • Rask G, Behndig A. Effects of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmatism and direction of gaze on Goldmann applanation tonometry readings. Ophthalmic Res. 2005;38(1):49–55. doi:10.1159/000089762
  • Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Investig Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2004;45(9):3118–3121. doi:10.1167/Iovs.04-0018
  • Nomura H, Ando F, Niino N, Shimokata H, Miyake Y. The relationship between intraocular pressure and refractive error adjusting for age and central corneal thickness. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2004;24:41–45. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00158.x
  • Yassin SA, Al-Tamimi ER. Age, gender and refractive error association with intraocular pressure in healthy Saudi participants: a cross-sectional study. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2016;30(1):44–48. doi:10.1016/J.Sjopt.2015.11.007
  • Bonomi L, Mecca E, Massa F. Intraocular Pressure in Myopic Anisometropia. Vol. 5. Dr W. Junk Pubhshers; 1982.
  • Nakao Y, Kiuchi Y, Okumichi H, Mohan RR. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using corvis ST and comparison of the corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0238395. doi:10.1371/Journal.Pone.0238395
  • Ye Y, Yang Y, Fan Y, Lan M, Yu K, Yu M. Comparison of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure obtained by corvis ST and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(10):922–928. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001348
  • Roberts C. Biomechanics of the cornea and wavefront-guided laser refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2002;18:589–592. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-20020901-18