295
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Kahook Dual Blade versus Trabectome (KVT): Comparing Outcomes in Combination with Cataract Surgery

, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 145-154 | Received 06 Oct 2022, Accepted 19 Dec 2022, Published online: 10 Jan 2023

References

  • Kingman S. Glaucoma is second leading cause of blindness globally. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82:887–888.
  • Eye Disease Research Group. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):532. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.4.532
  • Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, Ceccarelli M, Fea AM. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0183142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0183142
  • Chou J, Turalba A, Hoguet A. Surgical innovations in glaucoma: the transition from trabeculectomy to MIGS. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2017;57(4):39–55. doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000192
  • Arora KS, Robin AL, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Ramulu PY. Use of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in medicare beneficiaries from 1994 to 2012. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(8):1615–1624. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.015
  • Johnson M. What controls aqueous humour outflow resistance? Exp Eye Res. 2006;82(4):545–557. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2005.10.011
  • Sieck EG, Epstein RS, Kennedy JB, et al. Outcomes of Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy with and without phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1(1):75–81. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2018.06.006
  • Dang Y, Roy P, Bussel II, Loewen RT, Parikh H, Loewen NA. Combined analysis of trabectome and phaco-trabectome outcomes by glaucoma severity. F1000Res. 2016;5:762. doi:10.12688/f1000research.8448.2
  • Iwasaki K, Kakimoto H, Orii Y, Arimura S, Takamura Y, Inatani M. Long-Term Outcomes of a Kahook Dual Blade Procedure Combined with Phacoemulsification in Japanese Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma. J Clin Med. 2022;11(5):1354. doi:10.3390/jcm11051354
  • Bravetti GE, Gillmann K, Salinas L, et al. Surgical outcomes of excisional goniotomy using the kahook dual blade in severe and refractory glaucoma: 12-month results. Eye. 2022. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-02196-y
  • Gillmann K, Mansouri K. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: where is the evidence? Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2020;9(3):203–214. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000294
  • Grieshaber MC, Pienaar A, Olivier J, Stegmann R. Clinical evaluation of the aqueous outflow system in primary open-angle glaucoma for canaloplasty. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(3):1498–1504. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4327
  • Brusini P, Filacorda S. Enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2006;15(1):40–46. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000195932.48288.97
  • Dorairaj SK, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, et al. 12-Month outcomes of goniotomy performed using the kahook dual blade combined with cataract surgery in eyes with medically treated glaucoma. Adv Ther. 2018;35(9):1460–1469. doi:10.1007/s12325-018-0755-4
  • ElMallah MK, Seibold LK, Kahook MY, et al. 12-Month retrospective comparison of Kahook Dual Blade excisional goniotomy with iStent trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucomatous eyes at the time of cataract surgery. Adv Ther. 2019;36(9):2515–2527. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01025-1
  • Le C, Kazaryan S, Hubbell M, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS. Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification followed by iStent implantation versus goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade in patients with mild primary open-angle glaucoma with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(5):411–414. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001143
  • Kornmann HL, Fellman RL, Feuer WJ, et al. Early results of goniotomy with the Kahook Dual Blade, a novel device for the treatment of glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2369–2376. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S224643
  • Ventura-Abreu N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Pazos M, Biarnes M, Morales-Fernandez L, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM. Twelve-month results of ab interno trabeculectomy with Kahook Dual Blade: an interventional, randomized, controlled clinical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(9):2771–2781. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05213-0
  • Tan Q, Li J, Lin D, Zhao P. Risk factors of surgical failure in combined phacoemulsification and excisional goniotomy for angle-closure glaucoma. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. doi:10.1007/s00417-022-05808-1
  • Murata N, Takahashi E, Saruwatari J, Kojima S, Inoue T. Outcomes and risk factors for ab interno trabeculotomy with a Kahook Dual Blade. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. doi:10.1007/s00417-022-05799-z
  • Salinas L, Chaudhary A, Berdahl JP, et al. Goniotomy using the Kahook Dual Blade in severe and refractory glaucoma: 6-Month outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(10):849–855. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001019
  • Porter M, Garza A, Gallardo M. Excisional goniotomy in Latino patients with open-angle glaucoma: outcomes through 24 months. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3619–3625. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S271923
  • Laroche D, Nkrumah G, Ugoh P, Ng C. Real world outcomes of Kahook Dual Blade goniotomy in Black and Afro-Latinx adult patients with glaucoma: a 6-Month retrospective study. J Natl Med Assoc. 2021;113(2):230–236. doi:10.1016/j.jnma.2020.09.147
  • Ahmed SF, Bhatt A, Schmutz M, Mosaed S. Trabectome outcomes across the spectrum of glaucoma disease severity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(9):1703–1710. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-4023-8
  • Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E, Pahlitzsch M, Maier-Wenzel AB, Torun N, Klamann MK. Contralateral eye comparison study in MICS & MIGS: trabectome vs. iStent inject. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(2):359–365. doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3514-8
  • Kurji K, Rudnisky CJ, Rayat JS, et al. Phaco-trabectome versus phaco-iStent in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52(1):99–106. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.06.018
  • Ting JLM, Rudnisky CJ, Damji KF. Prospective randomized controlled trial of phaco-trabectome versus phaco-trabeculectomy in patients with open angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(6):588–594. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.01.033
  • Bussel II, Kaplowitz K, Schuman JS, Loewen NA, Trabectome Study G. Outcomes of ab interno trabeculectomy with the trabectome by degree of angle opening. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(7):914–919. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305577
  • Nazarali SA, Damji KF. Ab interno trabeculectomy with Trabectome: outcomes in African American versus Caucasian patients. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018;53(4):361–364. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.10.018
  • Okeke CO, Miller-Ellis E, Rojas M, Trabectome Study G. Trabectome success factors. Medicine. 2017;96(24):e7061. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000007061
  • Centers For Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physician fee schedule search; 2021. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/physician-fee-schedule/search. Accessed 30, May, 2021.
  • Iordanous Y, Kent JS, Hutnik CM, Malvankar-Mehta MS. Projected cost comparison of Trabectome, iStent, and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation versus glaucoma medication in the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. J Glaucoma. 2014;23(2):e112–8. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829d9bc7
  • Mansberger SL, Gordon MO, Jampel H, et al. Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(9):1826–1831. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.050