Evaluating the Performance of Verofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in a Group of Heavy Digital Device Users

References

• Cope JR, Collier SA, Nethercut H, Jones JM, Yates K, Yoder JS. Risk behaviors for contact lens-related eye infections among adults and adolescents - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;66(32):841–845. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6632a2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucker AD, Tichenor AA. A review of contact lens dropout. Clin Optomet. 2020;12:85–94. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S198637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Woods CA, Jones LW, Fonn D. The impact of contemporary contact lenses on contact lens discontinuation. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(1):93–99. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e318271caf4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JJ, Willcox MD, Bron AJ, et al. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: executive summary. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS7–TFOS13. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulley A, Young G, Hunt C, McCready S, Targett MT, Craven R. Retention rates in new contact lens wearers. Eye Contact Lens. 2018;44(Suppl 1):S273–s282. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard AL, Wolffsohn JS. Digital eye strain: prevalence, measurement and amelioration. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2018;3(1):e000146. doi:10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona G, García C, Serés C, Vilaseca M, Gispets J. Blink rate, blink amplitude, and tear film integrity during dynamic visual display terminal tasks. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36(3):190–197. doi:10.3109/02713683.2010.544442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himebaugh NL, Begley CG, Bradley A, Wilkinson JA. Blinking and tear break-up during four visual tasks. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(2):106–114. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318194e962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen ME, Begley CG, Himebaugh NH, Port NL. Effect of contact lens wear and a near task on tear film break-up. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(5):350–357. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181d951df
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portello JK, Rosenfield M, Chu CA. Blink rate, incomplete blinks and computer vision syndrome. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(5):482–487. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31828f09a7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Wong A, Haider S, et al. Blink rate in silicone hydrogel contact lens wearers during digital device use. Presented at: Amercian Academy of Optometry Meeting; Anaheim; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Coles-Brennan C, Sulley A, Young G. Management of digital eye strain. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(1):18–29. doi:10.1111/cxo.12798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talens-Estarelles C, García-Marqués JV, Cerviño A, García-Lázaro S. Determining the best management strategy for preventing short-term effects of digital display use on dry eyes. Eye Contact Lens. 2022;48(10):416–423. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Lingham G, Downie LE, et al. TFOS Lifestyle: impact of the digital environment on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf. 2023;28:213–252. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong TN, Graham AD, Lin MC. Factors in contact lens symptoms: evidence from a multistudy database. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(2):133–141. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keir N, Jones L. Wettability and silicone hydrogel lenses: a review. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(1):100–108. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31827d546e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Croner D, Huth S, Panganiban O. Wettability of contact lenses: are wetting angles clinically significant? Rev Cornea Contact Lenses. 2006;42:47.
   Google Scholar
• Willcox M, Keir N, Maseedupally V, et al. BCLA CLEAR - Contact lens wettability, cleaning, disinfection and interactions with tears. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(2):157–191. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2021.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew JH. White paper: PRECISION1® Contact Lenses With SMARTSURFACE® Technology: Material Properties, Surface Wettability and Clinical Performance; 2019. Available from: https://us.alconscience.com/sites/g/files/rbvwei1736/files/pdf/1906A195-US-DP1-19-E-1306_DP1-White-Paper_iPad.pdf. Accessed October 04, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Shi C, Cantu-Crouch D, Sharma V, Wu J. Characterization of a novel surface modified silicone hydrogel contact lens in fully hydrated environments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(9):6349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L, Spear KG, Brobst A, Cummings S. Clinical lens fit characteristics of a new silicone hydrogel daily disposable and two commercially available daily disposable contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(Supplement 1):5.
   Google Scholar
• Schulze MM, Ng A, Luensmann D, Guthrie S, Woods J, Jones L. The subjective response to verofilcon A daily disposable contact lenses during extensive digital device use. Presented at: Academy at Home E-abstract 205290; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Miller J, Giedd B, Subbaraman LN. Clinical comparison of a silicone hydrogel and a conventional hydrogel daily disposable contact lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:4339–4345. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S332651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogt JS, Patton K. Long day wear experience with water surface daily disposable contact lenses. Clin Optom. 2022;14:93–99. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S367891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L, Tucker B, Leveillee E, Bauman E Characterizing the surface properties of daily disposable contact lens materials. Presented at: British Contact Lens Association/Netherlands Contact Lens Congress; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N. Blinking abnormalities. In: Contact Lens Complications. Elsevier Ltd; 2012:39–46. chap 4.
   Google Scholar
• Luensmann D, Keir N, Richter D, Despres M, Woods C, Fonn D. In vivo wettability changes over 3 days using daily disposable contact lenses. Optomet Vis Sci. 2011;88:E–abstract 115384.
   Google Scholar
• Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics. 1998;18(2):182–186. doi:10.1046/j.1475-1313.2001.00575.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton K, Caffery B, Dogru M, et al. The TFOS international workshop on contact lens discomfort: report of the subcommittee on epidemiology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(11):TFOS20–TFOS36. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauste A, Ronda E, Molina M-J, Seguí M. Effect of contact lens use on computer vision syndrome. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics. 2016;36(2):112–119. doi:10.1111/opo.12275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MD, Zhao Z, Naduvilath T, Lazon de la Jara P. Cytokine changes in tears and relationship to contact lens discomfort. Mol Vis. 2015;21:293–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMonnies CW. An amplifying cascade of contact lens-related end-of-day hyperaemia and dryness symptoms. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(7):839–847. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1457163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Skadahl E, Nichols JJ. Frequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuation. Cornea. 2007;26(2):168–174. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000248382.32143.86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of contact lens wearers to a dry eye survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77(1):40–46. doi:10.1097/00006324-200001000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers R, Long B, Dillehay S, Begley C. Improving contact-lens related dryness symptoms with silicone hydrogel lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85(8):778–784. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318181a90d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer J, Steffen R, Reindel W, Chinn J. Evaluation of surface water characteristics of novel daily disposable contact lens materials, using refractive index shifts after wear. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015:1973–1979. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S90376
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abusharha AA. Changes in blink rate and ocular symptoms during different reading tasks. Clin Optom. 2017;9:133–138. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S142718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mohtaseb Z, Schachter S, Shen Lee B, Garlich J, Trattler W. The relationship between dry eye disease and digital screen use. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:3811–3820. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S321591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CA, Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Blink patterns: reading from a computer screen versus hard copy. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(3):297–302. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh S, Maeda N, Hori Y, et al. Effects of suppression of blinking on quality of vision in borderline cases of evaporative dry eye. Cornea. 2008;27(3):275–278. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31815be9c8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona G, Gómez M, Quevedo L, Gispets J. Effects of transient blur and VDT screen luminance changes on eyeblink rate. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(5):363–367. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2014.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillon M, Dumbleton KA, Theodoratos P, et al. Association between contact lens discomfort and pre-lens tear film kinetics. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(8):881–891. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai LC, Tomlinson A, Doane MG. Effect of contact lens materials on tear physiology. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(3):194–204. doi:10.1097/00006324-200403000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar