Effect of Artificial Tears on Preoperative Keratometry and Refractive Precision in Cataract Surgery

References

• Papas EB. The global prevalence of dry eye disease: a Bayesian view. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(6):1254–1266. doi:10.1111/opo.12888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein OD, Muñoz B, Tielsch JM, Bandeen-Roche K, West S. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;124(6):723–728. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)71688-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):334–365. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MDP, Argüeso P, Georgiev GA, et al. TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):366–403. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger G. The importance of the precorneal tear film for the quality of optical imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76(3):157–158. doi:10.1136/bjo.76.3.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto E, Yagi Y, Matsumoto Y, Tsubota K. Impaired functional visual acuity of dry eye patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133(2):181–186. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01365-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(2):125–129. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80917-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epitropoulos AT, Matossian C, Berdy GJ, Malhotra RP, Potvin R. Effect of tear osmolarity on repeatability of keratometry for cataract surgery planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1672–1677. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerdrum B, Gundersen KG, Lundmark PO, Aakre BM. Repeatability of OCT-based versus scheimpflug- and reflection-based keratometry in patients with hyperosmolar and normal tear film. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:3991–4003. doi:10.2147/opth.S280868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovanesian JA, Berdy GJ, Epitropoulos A, Holladay JT. Effect of cyclosporine 0.09% treatment on accuracy of preoperative biometry and higher order aberrations in dry eye patients undergoing cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:3679–3686. doi:10.2147/opth.S325659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovanesian J, Epitropoulos A, Donnenfeld ED, Holladay JT. The effect of lifitegrast on refractive accuracy and symptoms in dry eye patients undergoing cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2709–2716. doi:10.2147/opth.S264520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Kim MK, Ha Y, Paik HJ, Kim DH. Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation by preoperative management of dry eye disease. BMC Ophthalmol. 21(1):364. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-02129-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen MN, Søndergaard AP, Pommerencke C, Møller F. Variations in keratometric values (K-value) after administration of three different eye drops - effects on the intraocular lens calculations in relation to cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98(6):613–617. doi:10.1111/aos.14408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, et al. TFOS DEWS II management and therapy report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):575–628. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graae Jensen P, Gundersen M, Nilsen C, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among individuals scheduled for cataract surgery in a Norwegian cataract clinic. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1233–1243. doi:10.2147/opth.S407805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen C, Graae Jensen P, Gundersen M, et al. The significance of inter-eye osmolarity difference in dry eye diagnostics. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:829–835. doi:10.2147/opth.S402556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, et al. TFOS DEWS II diagnostic methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):539–574. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmolarity Tests Cards. Instructions for Use. TearLab; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Keratograph_5M user guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22(7):640–650. doi:10.1097/00003226-200310000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anterion user manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eyestar 900 user manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lenstar 900 User guide pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Charalampidou S, Cassidy L, Ng E, et al. Effect on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery of intraocular lens constant personalization using the Haigis formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(7):1081–1089. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röggla V, Leydolt C, Schartmüller D, et al. Influence of artificial tears on keratometric measurements in cataract patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;221:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr CE, Gupta PK, Farid M, et al. An algorithm for the preoperative diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disorders. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(5):669–684. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill WE, Abulafia A, Wang L, Koch DD. Pursuing perfection in IOL calculations. II. Measurement foibles: measurement errors, validation criteria, IOL constants, and lane length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):869–870. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368–376. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, et al. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):438–510. doi:10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grein HJ, Schmidt O, Ritsche A. Reproducibility of subjective refraction measurement. Ophthalmologe. 2014;111(11):1057–1064. doi:10.1007/s00347-014-3064-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar