Phaco-Chop versus Divide-and-Conquer in Patients Who Underwent Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

• Fang R, Y-F Y, E-J L, et al. Global, regional, national burden and gender disparity of cataract: findings from the global burden of disease study. BMC Public Health. 2019;2019:1.
   Google Scholar
• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–618. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis G. The Evolution of Cataract Surgery. Mo Med. 2016;113(1):58–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amaral DC, Louzada RN, Moreira PHS, et al. Combined endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone in the glaucoma treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2024;16(3):e55853. doi:10.7759/cureus.55853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdy MA, Eid MZ, Mohammed MA, Hafez A, Bhatia J. Relationship between endothelial cell loss and microcoaxial phacoemulsification parameters in noncomplicated cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:503–510. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S29865
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gimbel HV. Divide and conquer nucleofractis phacoemulsification: development and variations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;17(3):281–291. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80824-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad M, Daigavane VS. A comparative study of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell density after phacoemulsification by ‘phaco-chop’ and ‘divide and conquer’ techniques. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2020/45010.14065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Yum HR, Kim MS, Harrison AR, Kim EC. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39(10):1463–1469. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Muñoz E, Chávez-Romero Y, Rivero-Gómez R, Aridjis R, Gonzalez-Salinas R. Cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) in three phaco-fragmentation techniques for dense cataract removal. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:2405–2412. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S407705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumpston MS, McKenzie JE, Welch VA, Brennan SE. Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 2nd edition. J Public Health. 2022;44(4):e588–e92. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdac036
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919. doi:10.1136/bmj.i4919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley Online Library; 2019:694.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson M, Garner P, Donegan S. Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: a tutorial. Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2019;7(2):192–198. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–560. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–463. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsorbatzoglou A, Módis L, Kertész K, Németh G, Berta A. Comparison of divide and conquer and phaco-chop techniques during fluid-based phaco-emulsification. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(3):315–319. doi:10.1177/112067210701700306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirazzoli G, D’Eliseo D, Ziosi M, Acciarri R. Effects of phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium using phacofracture and phaco chop techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22(7):967–969. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80200-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storr-Paulsen A, Norregaard JC, Ahmed S, Storr-Paulsen T, Pedersen TH. Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):996–1000. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong T, Hingorani M, Lee V. Phacoemulsification time and power requirements in phaco chop and divide and conquer nucleofractis techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(9):1374–1378. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00538-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck KM, Patterson M, Markowitz B. Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy utilized in phaco chop versus divide and conquer during phacoemulsification as performed by a resident surgeon. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2016;57(12):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Olson LE, Marshall J, Rice NS, Andrews R. Effects of ultrasound on the corneal endothelium: i. The acute lesion. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978;62(3):134–144. doi:10.1136/bjo.62.3.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz RO, Glasser DB, Matsuda M, Yee RW, Edelhauser HF. Response of the corneal endothelium to cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104(8):1164–1169. doi:10.1001/archopht.1986.01050200070053
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dick HB, Kohnen T, Jacobi FK, Jacobi KW. Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification through a temporal clear corneal incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22(1):63–71. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80272-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krey HF. Ultrasonic turbulences at the phacoemulsification tip. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989;15(3):343–344. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(89)80098-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig MT, Olson RJ, Mamalis N, Olson RJ. Air bubble endothelial damage during phacoemulsification in human eye bank eyes: the protective effects of Healon and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(5):597–602. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80777-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder PS, Sternberg H, Wickman MG, Worthen DM. Corneal endothelial damage associated with phacoemulsification. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;82(1):48–54. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(76)90663-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger EJ, Hardten DR, Shah GK, Lindstrom RL. Phacoemulsification and modern cataract surgery. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;44(2):123–147. doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00085-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreisler KR, Mortenson SW, Mamalis N. Endothelial cell loss following ”modern” phacoemulsification by a senior resident. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23(3):158–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Werblin TP. Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification: model for evaluating endothelial damage after intraocular surgery. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9(1):29–35. doi:10.3928/1081-597X-19930101-08
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hayashi K, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification using nuclear cracking procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20(1):44–47. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80042-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Valle D, Benítez Del Castillo Sánchez JM, Castillo A, Sayagués O, Moriche M. Endothelial damage with cataract surgery techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24(7):951–955. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80049-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch PS, Katzen LE. Stop and chop phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994;20(5):566–570. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80239-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid M, Ameen SS, Ayub N, Mehboob MA. Effects of anterior chamber depth and axial length on corneal endothelial cell density after phacoemulsification. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(1):200–204. doi:10.12669/pjms.35.1.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Muñoz E, Zamora-Ortiz R, Gonzalez-Salinas R. Endothelial cell density changes in diabetic and nondiabetic eyes undergoing phacoemulsification employing phaco-chop technique. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(8):1735–1741. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-0995-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan N, Srinivasan R, Babu KR, Vallinayagam M. Risk factors for endothelial cell damage in diabetics after phacoemulsification. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(2):94–98. doi:10.4103/ojo.OJO_200_2017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen M, Anderson E, Hill G, Chen JJ, Patrianakos T. Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1367–1372. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S88225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon KD, Lorente R, Fanney D, Cionni RJ. Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(4):542–549. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menikoff JA, Speaker MG, Marmor M, Raskin EM. A case-control study of risk factors for postoperative endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(12):1761–1768. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32053-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd JR. In situ fracture. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16(4):436–440. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80796-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yen AJ, Ramanathan S. Advanced cataract learning experience in United States ophthalmology residency programs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(10):1350–1355. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabandeh H, Wilkins M, Thompson G, Nassiri D, Karim A. Hardness and ultrasonic characteristics of the human crystalline lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(6):838–841. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00305-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral DC, Menezes AHG, Vilaça lima LC, et al. Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Ectasia After Refractive Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2024;18:865–879. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S451232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral DC, Guedes J, de Oliveira Caneca K, et al. Manual small incision cataract surgery combined with trabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification combined with trabeculectomy for coexisting glaucoma and cataract: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2024;2024:1
   Google Scholar