Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 18, 2024 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
28
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Trifocal or Trifocal Toric IOLs in Chinese Cataract Patients: Focus on Near Vision at 33 cm

Xinfang CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Jie ShaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Yonggang ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
,
Li ZhengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaView further author information
&
Jun ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hangzhou MSK Eye Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8259-9795View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 1447-1456 | Received 18 Feb 2024, Accepted 17 May 2024, Published online: 24 May 2024

References

  • Diakonis VF, Yesilirmak N, Cabot F, et al. Comparison of surgically induced astigmatism between femtosecond laser and manual clear corneal incisions for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2075–2080. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.004
  • Löffler F, Böhm M, Herzog M, Petermann K, Kohnen T. Tomographic analysis of anterior and posterior and total corneal refractive power changes after femtosecond laser-assisted keratotomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;180:102–109. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.05.015
  • He Q, Huang J, Xu Y, Han W. Changes in total, anterior, and posterior corneal surface higher-order aberrations after 1.8 mm incision and 2.8 mm incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45(8):1135–1147. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.038
  • Chow SSW, Chan TCY, Alk N, Kwok AKH. Outcomes of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses after laser in situ keratomileusis. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(5):1199–1204. doi:10.1007/s10792-018-0908-0
  • Galvis V, Escaf LC, Escaf LJ, et al. Visual and satisfaction results with implantation of the trifocal Panoptix® intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Optom. 2022;15(3):219–227. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2021.05.002
  • Blehm C, Potvin R. Reported patient satisfaction and spectacle independence following bilateral implantation of the PanOptix(®) trifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:2907–2912. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S323337
  • Wu LJ, You QS, Duan JL, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of myopia in high-school students in Beijing. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120764. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120764
  • Zhang J, Liu J, Jasti S, Suryakumar R, Bullimore MA. Visual demand and acuity reserve of Chinese versus English newspapers. Optom Vis Sci. 2020;97(10):865–870. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001585
  • Xu M, Jordan TR. Assessing effects of viewing distance on normal Chinese reading: some methodological and theoretical implications. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):971–976. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.971
  • Holden BA, Fricke TR, Wilson DA, et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1036–1042. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006
  • Wang Y, Bao J, Ou L, Thorn F, Lu F. Reading behavior of emmetropic schoolchildren in China. Vision Res. 2013;86:43–51. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.03.007
  • Leung T, Flitcroft DI, Wallman J, et al. A novel instrument for logging nearwork distance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(2):137–144. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00814.x
  • de Medeiros AL, Jones Saraiva F, Iguma CI, et al. Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of two intraocular lenses with distinct diffractive optics. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13:1657–1663. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S202895
  • Zhang J, Shao J, Zheng L, Shen Y, Zhao X. Comparative clinical accuracy analysis of the newly developed ZZ IOL and four existing IOL formulas for post-corneal refractive surgery eyes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2021;21(1):231. doi:10.1186/s12886-021-01991-7
  • Donmez O, Asena BS, Kaskaloglu M, Akova YA. Patients satisfaction and clinical outcomes of binocular implantation of a new trifocal intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40(5):1069–1075. doi:10.1007/s10792-020-01390-9
  • Kohnen T, Marchini G, Alfonso JF, et al. Innovative trifocal (quadrifocal) presbyopia-correcting IOLs: 1-year outcomes from an international multicenter study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(8):1142–1148. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000232
  • Dick HB, Ang RE, Corbett D, et al. Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a new multifocal intraocular lens vs a trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022;48(11):1270–1276. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000971
  • Zhang J, Shao J, Cao X, Zhang Y, Zheng L. Defocus curve and satisfaction of patients with presbyopia after LASIK using the differential modulation of binocular longitudinal spherical aberration. OPTH. 2023;17:3531–3542. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S437324
  • Zhang J, Zheng L, Zhang Y, Wang K. Analysis of asphericity and corneal longitudinal spherical aberration of 915 Chinese myopic adult eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:591–600. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S404437

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.