MIGS in Severe Glaucoma: 12-Month Retrospective Efficacy and Safety of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery with Cataract Extraction

References

• Nichani P, Popovic MM, Schlenker MB, Park J, Ahmed IIK. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: a review of 3476 eyes. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021;66(5):714–742. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vold S, Ahmed IIK, Craven ER, et al. Two-year compass trial results: supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(10):2103–2112. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craven ER, Katz LJ, Wells JM, Giamporcaro JE; iStent Study Group. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(8):1339–1345. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengerer FH, Auffarth GU, Riffel C, Conrad-Hengerer I. Prospective, non-randomized, 36-month study of second-Generation trabecular micro-bypass stents with phacoemulsification in eyes with various types of glaucoma. Ophthalmol Ther. 2018;7(2):405–415. doi:10.1007/s40123-018-0152-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Marquis R, et al. A schlemm canal microstent for intraocular pressure reduction in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: the horizon study. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(1):29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Sarkisian SR, Lubeck DM, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled pivotal trial of an ab interno implanted trabecular micro-bypass in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year results. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(6):811–821. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson TJ, Swan R, Sudhagoni R, Berdahl JP. Microbypass stent implantation with cataract extraction and endocyclophotocoagulation versus microbypass stent with cataract extraction for glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(3):377–382. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL. Three-year follow-up of the tube versus trabeculectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):670–684. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sng CCA, Barton K. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery. Springer Nature; 2021. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5632-6
   Google Scholar
• Mai DD, Ingram Z, Oberfeld B, Solá-Del Valle D. Combined microinvasive glaucoma surgery - a review of the literature and future directions. Semin Ophthalmol. 2023;38(6):529–536. doi:10.1080/08820538.2023.2181665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberfeld B, Golsoorat Pahlaviani F, Hall N, et al. Combined MIGS: comparing additive effects of phacoemulsification, endocyclophotocoagulation, and kahook dual blade. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2023;17:1647–1659. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S410471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Helwe H, Oberfeld B, Golsoorat Pahlaviani F, Falah H, Trzcinski J, Solá-Del Valle D. Comparing outcomes of phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation with either dual blade goniotomy (peck) or two Trabecular stents (ICE2). Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2023;17:2879–2888. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S431356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedde SJ, Vinod K, Wright MM, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1):P71–P150. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorairaj SK, Kahook MY, Williamson BK, Seibold LK, ElMallah MK, Singh IP. A multicenter retrospective comparison of goniotomy versus trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract extraction. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2018;12:791–797. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S158403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElMallah MK, Seibold LK, Kahook MY, et al. 12-month retrospective comparison of kahook dual blade excisional goniotomy with istent trabecular bypass device implantation in glaucomatous eyes at the time of cataract surgery. Adv Ther. 2019;36(9):2515–2527. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01025-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieck EG, Epstein RS, Kennedy JB, et al. Outcomes of kahook dual blade goniotomy with and without phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018;1(1):75–81. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2018.06.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le C, Kazaryan S, Hubbell M, Zurakowski D, Ayyala RS. Surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification followed by istent implantation versus goniotomy with the kahook dual blade in patients with mild primary open-angle glaucoma with a minimum of 12-month follow-up. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(5):411–414. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura-Abreu N, García-Feijoo J, Pazos M, Biarnés M, Morales-Fernández L, Martínez-de-la-casa JM. Twelve-month results of ab interno trabeculectomy with kahook dual blade: an interventional, randomized, controlled clinical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021;259(9):2771–2781. doi:10.1007/s00417-021-05213-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki K, Takamura Y, Orii Y, Arimura S, Inatani M. Performances of glaucoma operations with kahook dual blade or iStent combined with phacoemulsification in Japanese open angle glaucoma patients. Int J Ophthalmol. 2020;13(6):941–945. doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.06.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki R, Hirooka K, Goda E, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between microhook ab interno trabeculotomy and goniotomy with the kahook dual blade in combination with phacoemulsification: a retrospective, comparative case series. Adv Ther. 2021;38(1):329–336. doi:10.1007/s12325-020-01543-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari E, Loganathan D. 12-month clinical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and ab interno trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma in the United Kingdom. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0252826. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenberry S, Singh IP, Crane CJ, et al. Excisional goniotomy vs trabecular microbypass stent implantation: a prospective randomized clinical trial in eyes with mild to moderate open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46(8):1165–1171. doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter M, Garza A, Gallardo M. Excisional goniotomy in latino patients with open-angle glaucoma: outcomes through 24 months. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2020;14:3619–3625. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S271923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-de-la-casa JM, et al. A randomized trial of a schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(7):1283–1293. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fea AM, Rekas M, Au L. Evaluation of a schlemm canal scaffold microstent combined with phacoemulsification in routine clinical practice: two-year multicenter study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(7):886–891. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed IIK, Fea A, Au L, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing Hydrus and iStent microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants for standalone treatment of open-angle glaucoma: the compare study. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(1):52–61. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mugheiry TS, Cate H, Clark A, Broadway DC. Microinvasive glaucoma stent (migs) surgery with concomitant phakoemulsification cataract extraction: outcomes and the learning curve. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(7):646–651. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casagrande MK, Meier L, Farrokhi S, Spitzer M, Klemm M, Ufret-Vincenty RL. Effect of the Hydrus microstent with combined phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60(9):3740. doi:10.1167/iovs.19-27212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand N, Klug E, Nirappel A, Solá-Del Valle D. A review of cyclodestructive procedures for the treatment of glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol. 2020;35(5–6):261–275. doi:10.1080/08820538.2020.1810711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uram M. Combined phacoemulsification, endoscopic ciliary process photocoagulation, and intraocular lens implantation in glaucoma management. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995;26(4):346–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Netland PA, Mansberger SL, Lin S. Uncontrolled intraocular pressure after endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation. J Glaucoma. 2007;16(2):265–267. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000243475.36213.41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold LK, SooHoo JR, Kahook MY. Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22(1):18–24. doi:10.4103/0974-9233.148344
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Izquierdo JC, Agudelo N, Rubio B, et al. Combined phacoemulsification and 360-degree endocyclophotocoagulation with and without a kahook dual blade in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ. 2021;15:11–17. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S282440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug E, Chachanidze M, Nirappel A, et al. Outcomes of phacoemulsification and endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation performed with dual blade ab interno trabeculectomy or trabecular micro-bypass stent insertion. Eye Lond Engl. 2021. doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01475-4
   Google Scholar
• Ho D, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42(1):1–28. doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08
   Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67(1):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenberghs G, Verbeke G. Models for Discrete Longitudinal Data. Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzmaurice GM, ed.. Longitudinal Data Analysis. CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard AE, Ahern J, Fleischer NL, et al. To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health. Epidemiol Camb Mass. 2010;21(4):467–474. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181caeb90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara A, Kosinski M, Biecek P, Fabian S. Survminer: drawing survival curves using “ggplot2”; 2021. Available from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survminer. Accessed August 23, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ling JD, Bell NP. Role of cataract surgery in the management of glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2018;58(3):87–100. doi:10.1097/IIO.0000000000000234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaarawy T, Grehn F, Sherwood M, Ebrary I. WGA Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical Trials. Kugler Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar