6
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

36-Month Outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath® Glaucoma Drainage Device in Severe Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1735-1742 | Received 08 Mar 2024, Accepted 12 Jun 2024, Published online: 18 Jun 2024

References

  • Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(10):1268–1279. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268
  • Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001;108(11):1943–1953. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00873-9
  • Van Veldhuisen PC, Ederer F, Gaasterland DE, et al. The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–440.
  • Gedde SJ, Heuer DK, Parrish RK. Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study G. Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21(2):123–128. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68
  • Ramulu PY, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Robin AL. Utilization of various glaucoma surgeries and procedures in Medicare beneficiaries from 1995 to 2004. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):2265–2270. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.005
  • Chen PP, Yamamoto T, Sawada A, Parrish RK, Kitazawa Y. Use of antifibrosis agents and glaucoma drainage devices in the American and Japanese Glaucoma Societies. J Glaucoma. 1997;6(3):192–196. doi:10.1097/00061198-199706000-00010
  • Wilson MR, Mendis U, Paliwal A, Haynatzka V. Long-term follow-up of primary glaucoma surgery with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(3):464–470. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00239-3
  • Vinod K, Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, et al. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a Survey of the American Glaucoma Society. J Glaucoma. 2017;26(8):687–693. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000720
  • Molteno AC. New implant for drainage in glaucoma. Clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 1969;53(9):606–615. doi:10.1136/bjo.53.9.606
  • Langenberg K, Tran J, Koontz J, Kahook MY. Flow resistance and suture eyelet integrity of the Ahmed ClearPath glaucoma drainage device. Invest Ophth Vis Sci. 2020;61(7):3142.
  • Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Lim KS, et al. Treatment outcomes in the primary tube versus trabeculectomy study after 3 years of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(3):333–345. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.002
  • Gedde SJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, et al. Postoperative complications in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study during five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):804–814 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.024
  • Grover DS, Kahook MY, Seibold LK, et al. Clinical outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath implantation in glaucomatous eyes: a novel valveless glaucoma drainage device. J Glaucoma. 2022;31(5):335–339. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002013
  • Dorairaj S, Checo LA, Wagner IV, Ten Hulzen RD, Ahuja AS. 24-month outcomes of Ahmed ClearPath® glaucoma drainage device for refractory glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:2255–2262. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S368634
  • Shalaby WS, Reddy R, Wummer B, et al. Ahmed ClearPath vs baerveldt glaucoma implant: a retrospective noninferiority comparative study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.ogla.2023.12.006