Evaluation of the Functional Visual Range of a Catenary Curve-Based, Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lens for Presbyopia

References

• Mishra D, Bhushan P, Singh MK, et al. Prospective clinical study to find out epidemiology of presbyopia in a prepresbyopic population (age group 34–40 years). J Clin Ophthalmol Res. 2019;7(2):51–53. doi:10.4103/jcor.jcor_53_18
   Google Scholar
• Croft MA, Glasser A, Kaufman PL. Accommodation and presbyopia. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2001;41(2):33–46. doi:10.1097/00004397-200104000-00005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chuck, RS, Jacobs, DS, Lee, JK et al. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Refractive errors and refractive surgery preferred practice pattern. Ophthalmology. 2017; 125(1):11. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2019;68:124–143. doi:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PB, Efron N, Papas E, et al. BCLA BLEAR presbyopia: management with contact lenses and spectacles. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024;16:102158.
   Google Scholar
• Montes-Mico R, Madrid-Costa D, Dominquez-Vicent A, et al. In vitro power profiles of multifocal simultaneous vision contact lenses. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(3):162–167. doi:10.10106/j.clae.2013.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Bakaraju RC, Ehrmann K. Power profiles of commercial multifocal soft contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2017;94(2):183–196. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollbaum PS, Dietmeier BM, Jansen ME, et al. Quantification of ghosting produced with presbyopic contact lens correction. Eye Contact Lens. 2012;38(4):252–259. doi:10.1097/ICL.0b013e31825aa879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedtke C, Bakaraju RC, Ehrmann K, et al. Visual performance of single vision and multifocal contact lenses in non-presbyopic myopic eyes. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39(1):38–46. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2015.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madrid-Costa D, Garcia-Lazaro S, Albarran-Diego C, et al. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(1):51–56. doi:10.1111/opo.12008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah AS, Gundel R. Low-contrast visual acuity measurements in single-vision and bifocal soft lens wearers. Int Contact Lens Clin. 2000;27(4):119–123. doi:10.1016/S0892-8967(02)00067-6
   Google Scholar
• Sha J, Bakarajiu RC, Tilia D, et al. Short-term visual performance of soft multifocal contact lenses for presbyopia. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2016;79(2):73–77. doi:10.5935/0004-2749.20160023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilia D, Bakaraju RC, Chung J, et al. Short-term visual performance of novel extended depth-of-focus contact lenses. Optom Vision Sci. 2016;93(3):435–444. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000806
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tilia D, Munro A, Chung J, et al. Short-term comparison between extended depth-of-focus prototype contact lenses and a commercially available center-near multifocal. J Optom. 2017;10(1):14–25. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2016.04.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dinardo A, Smiley G (2016). Causes of multifocal contact lens dissatisfaction. Presented at the American Academy of Optometry. Program #165109. Available from: http://www.aaopt.org/causes-multifocal-contact-lens-dissatisfaction. Accessed 19, July 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Piers PA, Fernandez EJ, Manzanera S, et al. Adaptive optics simulation of intraocular lenses with modified spherical aberration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(12):4601–4610. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha KM, Vabre L, Chateau N, et al. Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher-order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(11):1885–1892. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.05.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benard Y, Lopez-Gil N, Legras R. Subjective depth of field in presence of 4th-order and 6th-order Zernike spherical aberration using adaptive optics technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36(12):2129–2138. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benard Y, Lopez-Gil N, Legras R. Optimizing the subjective depth-of-focus with combinations of fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration. Vis Res. 2011;51(23–24):2471–2477. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi F, Iskander DR, Collins M. Depth of focus and visual acuity with primary and secondary spherical aberration. Vis Res. 2011;51(14):1648–1658. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakaraju RC, Ehrmann K, Ho A. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics. J Optom. 2018;11(1):10–20. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2017.04.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAlinden C, Moore J, McGilligan E, et al. Spherical aberration and higher order aberrations with Balafilcon A (PureVision) and Comfilcon A (Biofinity). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(4):607–612. doi:10.1007/s00417-010-1476-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin RA, Payer RE, Tyson MK, et al. Induced aperture lens and method. US11,630,326. USPTO; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Lee R, Dillehay S, Sommer T. A novel extended depth of focus multifocal contact lens design. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S47. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2018.03.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montani G, van der Worp E. Short-Term Optical and Visual Performance of Soft Contact Lenses for Myopia Management. Las Vegas, USA: Global Specialty Lens Symposium poster; 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman B, Patel A, Masters JS, et al. Extended depth of focus IOLs. EyeWiki, American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2023. Available from: https://eyewiki.aao.org/Extended_Depth_of_Focus_IOLs#:~:text=TECNIS%20Symfony%20IOL-,Definition,that%20enhances%20depth%20of%20focus. Accessed September 5, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Eydelman MF Developing novel endpoints for premium intraocular lenses workshop. Available from: www.fda.gov/media/88701/download. Accessed 5, September 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Richman EA FDA update: next-generation IOLs. EyeNet Magazine, 2014. Available from: www.aao.org/eyenet/article/fda-update-nextgeneration-iols. Accessed 5, September 2023.
   Google Scholar
• US Food & Drug Administration, TECNIS® multifocal 1-piece IOL, ZKB00 and ZLB00. P980040/S049. SSED; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• US Food & Drug Administration, TECNIS® symfony extended range of vision IOL. P980040/S065. SSED; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• US Food & Drug Administration, AcrySof® IQ vivityTM intraocular lens. P930014/S126. SSED; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Agahi N, Parker MG. Are today’s older people more active than their predecessors? Participation in leisure-time activities in Sweden in 1992 and 2002. Ageing Soc. 2005;25(6):925–941. doi:10.1017/S0144686X05004058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan P, Woods C, Tranoudis I, et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2022, key trends in prescribing highlighted by our 22nd global survey. Contact Lens Spectr. 2023;38(1):28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston AC, Cox IG. Population spherical aberration: associations with ametropia, age, corneal curvature, and image quality. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:933–938. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S44056
   PubMedGoogle Scholar