Search in:

Advanced search

Clinical Ophthalmology Volume 8, 2014 - Issue

Submit an article Journal homepage

Open access

412

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Original Research

Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL

Ihsan YilmazBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyCorrespondence[email protected]

Cigdem AltanBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Ebru Demet AygitBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Cengiz AlagozBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Okkes BazBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Sibel AhmetBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Semih UrvasizogluBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Dilek YasaBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Ahmet DemirokBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

show all

Pages 1069-1074 | Published online: 26 Nov 2022

Cite this article
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

ChiharaEAssessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical dataSurv Ophthalmol200853320321818501267
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
NebbiosoMFazioSDi BlasioDPescosolidoNHypobaric hypoxia: effects on intraocular pressure and corneal thicknessScientific World Journal2014201458521824550712
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FernandesPDíaz-ReyJAQueirósAGonzalez-MeijomeJMJorgeJComparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal populationOphthalmic Physiol Opt200525543644016101950
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
QuigleyHANumber of people with glaucoma worldwideBr J Ophthalmol19968053893938695555
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
GoldbergIRelationship between intraocular pressure and preservation of visual field in glaucomaSurv Ophthalmol200348Suppl 1S3S712852428
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
StamperRLA history of intraocular pressure and its measurementOptom Vis Sci2011881E16E2821150677
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ForbesMPicoGJrGrolmanBA noncontact applanation tonometer. Description and clinical evaluationArch Ophthalmol19749121341404810646
PubMedGoogle Scholar
ViestenzALausenBJünemannAMMardinCY[Comparison of precision of the TonoPenXL with the Goldmann and Draeger applanation tonometer in a sitting and recumbent position of the patients: a clinical study on 251 eyes]Klin Monbl Augenheilkd200221911785790 German12494368
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
AlMubradTMOgbuehiKCThe effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurementsClin Exp Optom200891652452918651843
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HerrARemkyAHirschTRenningsCPlangeNTonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometryClin Ophthalmol2013781581923662041
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hamed-AzzamSBriscoeDTomkinsOShehedeh-MashorRGarzoziHEvaluation of intraocular pressure according to corneal thickness before and after excimer laser corneal ablation for myopiaInt Ophthalmol201333434935423275189
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
RegineFScuderiGLCesareoMRicciFCedroneCNucciCValidity and limitations of the Nidek NT-4000 non-contact tonometer: a clinical studyOphthalmic Physiol Opt2006261333916390480
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WaliaJSChronisterCLPossible iatrogenic transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease via tonometer tips: a review of the literatureOptometry2001721064965211712632
PubMedGoogle Scholar
DesaiSPSivakumarSFryersPTEvaluation of a disposable prism for applanation tonometryEye (Lond)200115Pt 327928211450720
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TheelenTMeulendijksCFGeurtsDEvan LeeuwenAVoetNBDeutmanAFImpact factors on intraocular pressure measurements in healthy subjectsBr J Ophthalmol200488121510151115548801
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ParkerVAHerrtageJSarkiesNJClinical comparison of the Keeler Pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometryBr J Ophthalmol200185111303130411673293
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
TonnuPAHoTSharmaKWhiteEBunceCGarway-HeathDA comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variabilityBr J Ophthalmol200589784785015965164
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KaoSFLichterPRBergstromTJRoweSMuschDCClinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometerOphthalmology19879412154115443431824
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FrenkelREHongYJShinDHComparison of the Tono-Pen to the Goldmann applanation tonometerArch Ophthalmol198810667507533369998
PubMedGoogle Scholar
BandyopadhyayMRaychaudhuriALahiriSKSchwartzECMyattMJohnsonGJComparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry with the Tonopen for measuring intraocular pressure in a population-based glaucoma survey in rural West BengalOphthalmic Epidemiol20029321522412045888
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
IesterMMermoudAAchacheFRoySNew Tonopen XL: comparison with the Goldmann tonometerEye (Lond)200115Pt 1525811318296
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
OgbuehiKCAssessment of the accuracy and reliability of the Topcon CT80 non-contact tonometerClin Exp Optom200689531031416907669
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FarhoodQKComparative evaluation of intraocular pressure with an air-puff tonometer versus a Goldmann applanation tonometerClin Ophthalmol20137232723293511
PubMedGoogle Scholar
PopovichKSShieldsMBA comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the XPERT noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometryJ Glaucoma19976144469075080
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CarbonaroFAndrewTMackeyDASpectorTDHammondCJComparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thicknessEye (Lond)20102471165117020150923
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Sullivan-MeeMLewisSEPensylDGerhardtGHalversonKDQuallsCFactors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometryJ Glaucoma201322648749522407388
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WangASAlencarLMWeinrebRNRepeatability and reproducibility of Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometryJ Glaucoma201322212713221701395
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SalvetatMLZeppieriMTosoniCBrusiniPComparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucomaActa Ophthalmol Scand200785327227917488456
PubMedGoogle Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Comparison of three methods of tonometry in normal subjects: Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact airpuff tonometer, and Tono-Pen XL

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date