Contact lens wear and dry eyes: challenges and solutions

References

• StapletonFKeayLJalbertIColeNThe epidemiology of contact lens related infiltratesOptom Vis Sci20078425727217435509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PritchardNFonnDBrazeauDDiscontinuation of contact lens wear: a surveyInt Contact Lens Clin19992615716211384832
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BegleyCGChalmersRLMitchellGLCharacterization of ocular surface symptoms from optometric practices in North AmericaCornea20012061061811473162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RileyCYoungGChalmersRPrevalence of ocular surface symptoms, signs, and uncomfortable hours of wear in contact lens wearers: the effect of refitting with daily-wear silicone hydrogel lenses (senofilcon a)Eye Contact Lens20063228128617099389
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KaštelanSLukendaASalopek-RabatićJPavanJGotovacMDry eye symptoms and signs in long-term contact lens wearersColl Antropol20133719920323837244
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ReddySCYingKHThengLHHowOTFu-XiangKbin Mohamed SikanderMMA survey of dry eye symptoms in contact lens wearers and non-contact lens wearers among university students in MalaysiaJ Clin Exp Ophthalmol20167522
   Google Scholar
• ChalmersRLYoungGKernJNapierLHuntCSoft contact lens-related symptoms in North America and the United KingdomOptom Vis Sci20169383684727391535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NicholsKKRedfernRLJacobJTThe TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the definition and classification subcommitteeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201354TFOS14TFOS1924058134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NicholsJJJonesLNelsonJDThe TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: introductionInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201354TFOS1TFOS624058136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorganPBWoodsCAKnajianRInternational contact lens prescribing in 2007Contact Lens Spectrum20082234
   Google Scholar
• EfronNJonesLBronAJThe TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens interactions with the ocular surface and adnexa subcommitteeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201354TFOS98TFOS12224058133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GipsonIKDistribution of mucins at the ocular surfaceExp Eye Res20047837938815106916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJContact lens wear and the goblet cells of the human conjunctiva – a reviewCont Lens Anterior Eye20113415716321601508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SapkotaKFrancoSSampaioPLiraMEffect of three months of soft contact lens wear on conjunctival cytologyClin Exp Optom20169933634127146845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColoradoLHAlzahraniYPritchardNEfronNTime course of changes in goblet cell density in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearersInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20165725602566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnopEBrewittHInduction of conjunctival epithelial alterations by contact lens wearing. A prospective studyGer J Ophthalmol199211251341483123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CarracedoGMartin-GilAFonsecaBPintorJEffect of overnight orthokeratology on conjunctival goblet cellsCont Lens Anterior Eye20163926626927085466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJOn the variability in goblet cell density in human bulbar conjunctival samples collected by impression cytology with millicell-CM biopore membrane unitsCurr Eye Res2016411393139927159248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlzahraniYColoradoLHPritchardNEfronNLongitudinal changes in Langerhans cell density of the cornea and conjunctiva in contact lens-induced dry eyeClin Exp Optom20161001334027353750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJContact lens wear and the development of squamous metaplasia of the surface cells of the conjunctivaEye Contact Lens20113727428121808196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJReliability of nucleus-to-cell and nucleus-to-cytoplasm calculations for conjunctival impression cytology specimensCurr Eye Res20123758359122574637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJSampling area selection for the assessment of goblet cell density from conjunctival impression cytology specimensEye Contact Lens20123812212922306698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJAssessment of goblet cell orifice distribution across the rabbit bulbar conjunctiva based on numerical density and nearest neighbors analysisCurr Eye Res201338223725123327688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonJDWrightJCConjunctival goblet cell densities in ocular surface diseaseArch Ophthalmol1984102104910516378156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergmansonJPGTuklerJLeachNEAlabdelmoneamMMillerWLMorphology of contact lens-induced conjunctival epithelial flaps: a pilot studyCont Lens Anterior Eye20123518518822503643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo-RubidoJWolffsohnJGillmartinBConjunctival epithelial flaps with 18 months of silicone hydrogel contact lens wearEye Contact Lens200834353818180681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrahamADTruongTNLinMCConjunctival epithelial flap in continuous contact lens wearOptom Vis Sci200986324331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuillonMMaissaCBulbar conjunctival staining in contact lens wearers and non lens wearers and its association with symptomatologyCont Lens Anterior Eye200528677316318837
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MarkoulliMFrancisICYongJA Histopathological study of bulbar conjunctival flaps occurring in 2 contact lens wearersCornea20113091037104121716098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LøfstrømTKruseAA conjunctival response to silicone hydrogel lens wearContact Lens Spectrum92005
   Google Scholar
• OzkanJEhrmannKMeadowsDHoldenBde la JaraPLLens parameter changes under in vitro and ex vivo conditions and their effect on the conjunctivaCont Lens Anterior Eye201336417117523395396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MimuraTUsuiTYamamotoHConjunctivochalasis and contact lensesAm J Ophthalmol20091482025.e2119403112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LakkisCBrennanNABulbar conjunctival fluorescein staining in hydrogel contact lens wearersCLAO J1996221891948828936
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado-CodinaCMorganPBSchniderCMEfronNShort-term physiologic response in neophyte subjects fitted with hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lensesOptom Vis Sci20048191192115592115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PultHPurslowCBerryMMurphyPJClinical tests for successful contact lens wear: relationship and predictive potentialOptom Vis Sci200885E924E92918832967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FukuiMYamadaMAkuneYShigeyasuCTsubotaKFluorophotometric analysis of the ocular surface glycocalyx in soft contact lens wearersCurr Eye Res20164191425614920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AblamowiczAFNicholsJJOcular surface membrane-associated mucinsOcul Surf20161433134127154035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KorbDRGreinerJVHermanJPLid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearersCLAO J20022821121612394549
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchulzeMMSrinivasanSHickson-CurranSBLid wiper epitheliopathy in soft contact lens wearersOptom Vis Sci20169394395427391533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VarikootyJSrinivasanSSubbaramanLVariations in observable lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE) staining patterns in wearers of silicone hydrogel lensesCont Lens Anterior Eye20153847147626058810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NicholsJJLievensCWBloomensteinMRLiuHSimmonsPVehigeJDual-polymer drops, contact lens comfort, and lid wiper epitheliopathyOptom Vis Sci20169397998627254807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DengZWangJJiangHLid wiper microvascular responses as an indicator of contact lens discomfortAm J Ophthalmol201617019720527542928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlzahraniYColoradoLPritchardNEfronNInflammatory cell upregulation of the lid wiper in contact lens dry eyeOptom Vis Sci20169391792427055062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YamamotoYShiraishiASakaneYOhtaKYamaguchiMOhashiYInvolvement of eyelid pressure in lid-wiper epitheliopathyCurr Eye Res201641217117825803436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JieYXuLWuYJonasJPrevalence of dry eye among adult Chinese in the Beijing Eye StudyEye20092368869318309341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoughtyMJFonnDRichterDSimpsonTCafferyBGordonKA patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across CanadaOptom Vis Sci1997746246319323733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuPChenXLiuXDry eye syndrome in elderly Tibetans at high altitude: a population-based study in ChinaCornea20082754555118520503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchaumbergDADanaRBuringJESullivanDAPrevalence of dry eye disease among US men: estimates from the Physicians’ Health StudiesArch Ophthalmol200912776376819506195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchaumbergDASullivanDABuringJEDanaMRPrevalence of dry eye syndrome among US womenAm J Ophthalmol200313631832612888056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MossSEKleinRKleinBEPrevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndromeArch Ophthalmol20001181264126810980773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NicholsKKNicholsJJMitchellGLThe lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye diseaseCornea20042376277015502475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VisoERodríguez-AresMTAbelendaDOubiñaBGudeFPrevalence of asymptomatic and symptomatic meibomian gland dysfunction in the general population of SpainInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2012532601260622427596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NicholsKKFoulksGNBronAJThe International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: executive summaryInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2011521922192921450913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RichdaleKSinnottLTSkadahlENicholsJJFrequency of and factors associated with contact lens dissatisfaction and discontinuationCornea20072616817417251807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenriquezASKorbDRMeibomian glands and contact lens wearBr J Ophthalmol1981651081117459311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AritaRItohKInoueKKuchibaAYamaguchiTAmanoSContact lens wear is associated with decrease of meibomian glandsOphthalmology200911637938419167077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlghamdiWMMarkoulliMHoldenBAPapasEBImpact of duration of contact lens wear on the structure and function of the meibomian glandsOphthalmic Physiol Opt20163612013126890701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NicholsJJSinnottLTTear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eyeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2006471319132816565363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoxSMBerntsenDAChatterjeeNEyelid margin and meibomian gland characteristics and symptoms in lens wearersOptom Vis Sci20169390190827273272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RandonMLiangHEl HamdaouiMIn vivo confocal microscopy as a novel and reliable tool for the diagnosis of Demodex eyelid infestationBr J Ophthalmol20159933634125253768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RufliTMumcuogluYThe hair follicle mites Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis: biology and medical importance. A reviewDermatologica19811621116453029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TarkowskiWMoneta-WielgosJMlocickiDDemodex sp. as a potential cause of the abandonment of soft contact lenses by their existing usersBiomed Res Int2015201525910926290865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HomMMMastrotaKMSchachterSEDemodexOptom Vis Sci201390e198e20523748846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CraigJPWillcoxMDArguesoPThe TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the contact lens interactions with the tear film subcommitteeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201354TFOS123TFOS15624058139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BestNDruryLWolffsohnJSPredicting success with silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in new wearersCont Lens Anterior Eye20133623223723522993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuillonMDumbletonKATheodoratosPAssociation between contact lens discomfort and pre-lens tear film kineticsOptom Vis Sci20169388189127092926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EfronNContact lens wear is intrinsically inflammatoryClin Exp Optom201710031927806431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrangerDNSenchenkovaEInflammation and the MicrocirculationSan Rafael (CA)Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences2010
   Google Scholar
• The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report of the Definition and Classification Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007)Ocul Surf20075759217508116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-de la RosaAMartin-MontanezVLopez-MiguelACalongeMEnriquez-de-SalamancaAGonzalez-GarciaMJCorneal sensitivity and inflammatory biomarkers in contact lens discomfortOptom Vis Sci20169389290026636403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WillcoxMDZhaoZNaduvilathTLazon de la JaraPCytokine changes in tears and relationship to contact lens discomfortMol Vis20152129330525814827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasoudiSZhaoZStapletonFWillcoxMContact lens-induced discomfort and inflammatory mediator changes in tearsEye Contact Lens2017431404526808700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MasoudiSStapletonFJWillcoxMDContact lens-induced discomfort and protein changes in tearsOptom Vis Sci20169395596227232900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChotikavanichSde PaivaCSLi deQProduction and activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9 on the ocular surface increase in dysfunctional tear syndromeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci2009503203320919255163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarkoulliMPapasEColeNHoldenBEffect of contact lens wear on the diurnal profile of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in tearsOptom Vis Sci20139041942923563442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PapasETiliaDMcNallyJde la JaraPLOcular discomfort responses after short periods of contact lens wearOptom Vis Sci20159266567026001894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoswallGJEhlersWHLuistroAWorrallMDonshikPCA comparison of conventional and disposable extended wear contact lensesCLAO J1993191581658375036
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SolomonODFreemanMIBoshnickELA 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lensesCLAO J1996222502578906382
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PapasEBCiolinoJBJacobsDThe TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the management and therapy subcommitteeInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci201354TFOS183TFOS20324058131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SolomonAAllergic manifestations of contact lens wearingCurr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol20161649249727518840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkotnitskyCCNaduvilathTJSweeneyDFSankaridurgPRTwo presentations of contact lens-induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC) in hydrogel lens wear: local and generalOptom Vis Sci200683E27E36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SallKStevensonODMundorfTKReisBLGroup CPSTwo multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye diseaseOphthalmology200010763163910768324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OuslerGWMichaelsonCChristensenMTAn evaluation of tear film breakup time extension and ocular protection index scores among three marketed lubricant eye dropsCornea20072694995217721294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoulksGNClinical evaluation of the efficacy of PEG/PG lubricant eye drops with gelling agent (HP-Guar) for the relief of the signs and symptoms of dry eye disease: a reviewDrugs Today20074388789618174974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KorbDRScaffidiRCGreinerJVThe effect of two novel lubricant eye drops on tear film lipid layer thickness in subjects with dry eye symptomsOptom Vis Sci20058259460116044071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenelliUSystane® lubricant eye drops in the management of ocular drynessClin Ophthalmol2011578321750611
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonaldMSchachetJLLievensCWKernJRSystane® ultra lubricant eye drops for treatment of contact lens-related drynessEye Contact Lens20144010611024552755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuthrieSEJonesLBlackieCAKorbDRA comparative study between an oil-in-water emulsion and nonlipid eye drops used for rewetting contact lensesEye Contact Lens20154137337726488155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtTASullivanDAKnopETranscription, translation, and function of lubricin, a boundary lubricant, at the ocular surfaceJAMA Ophthalmol201313176677623599181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LambiaseASullivanBDSchmidtTAA two-week, randomized, double-masked study to evaluate safety and efficacy of lubricin (150 mug/mL) eye drops versus sodium hyaluronate (HA) 0.18% eye drops (Vismed(R)) in patients with moderate dry eye diseaseOcul Surf2017151778727614318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OlsonMCKorbDRGreinerJVIncrease in tear film lipid layer thickness following treatment with warm compresses in patients with meibomian gland dysfunctionEye Contact Lens200329969912695712
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IshidaRMatsumotoYOnguchiTTear film with “Orgahexa EyeMasks” in patients with meibomian gland dysfunctionOptom Vis Sci200885E684E691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoriAShimazakiJShimmuraSFujishimaHOguchiYTsubotaKDisposable eyelid-warming device for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunctionJpn J Ophthalmol20034757858614636848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangMTJaitleyZLordSMCraigJPComparison of self-applied heat therapy for meibomian gland dysfunctionOptom Vis Sci201592e321e32625955642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CraigJPJaitleyZLordSEvaluation of the potential therapeutic benefit of a contemporary portable warm compress treatmentContact Lens Anterior Eye201538e28
   Google Scholar
• DoaneMGAbnormalities of the structure of the superficial lipid layer on the in vivo dry-eye tear filmAdv Exp Med Biol19943504894938030522
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DoanSChiambarettaFBaudouinCESPOIR Study GroupEvaluation of an eyelid warming device (Blephasteam®) for the management of ocular surface diseases in France: The ESPOIR studyJ Fr Ophthalmol201437763772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PultHRiede-PultBHPurslowCA comparison of an eyelid-warming device to traditional compress therapyOptom Vis Sci201289E1035E104122729167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PurslowCEvaluation of the ocular tolerance of a novel eyelid-warming device used for meibomian gland dysfunctionContact Lens Anterior Eye20133622623123566749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MajmudarPGroup LSA novel thermal pulsation treatment for obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction: applying heat to the inner eyelid surfacesInvest Ophthalmol Vis Sci20105162816281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaneSSDuBinerHBEpsteinRJA new system, the LipiFlow, for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunctionCornea20123139640422222996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreinerJVComparison of efficacy and convenience of warm compresses and eyelid hygiene to thermal pulsation treatment for meibomian gland dysfunctionAbstract presented at the ASCRS ASOA Symposium & CongressSan Diego, CA, USAApril 17–21, 2015 Available from: https://ascrs.confex.com/ascrs/15am/webprogram/Paper13846.htmlAccessed February 3, 2017
   Google Scholar
• VarikootyJKeirNRichterDJonesLWWoodsCFonnDComfort response of three silicone hydrogel daily disposable contact lensesOptom Vis Sci20139094595323892493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczesna-IskanderDHComparison of tear film surface quality measured in vivo on water gradient silicone hydrogel and hydrogel contact lensesEye Contact Lens201440232724335451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarkoulliMNew advances in the understanding of the role of the ocular surface and tear film in contact lens discomfortAbstract presented at: 8th International Conference on the Tear Film & Ocular SurfaceSeptember 7–10, 2016Montpellier, France Available from: http://www.tfos2016.org/abstracts.phpAccessed February 14, 2017
   Google Scholar