102
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methodology

Grading Sphero-Cylinder Spectacle Similarity

ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 23-32 | Published online: 20 Jan 2021

References

  • Levitt AH, Martin SJ, Arnold RW. Performance of glow-fixation GCK and 2WIN photoscreeners and Retinomax to uncover hyperopia. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2237–2244. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S256991
  • Kirk S, Armitage MD, Dunn S, Arnold RW. Calibration and validation of the 2WIN photoscreener compared to the plusoptiX S12 and the SPOT. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014;51(5):1–4.
  • Arnold RW, Arnold AW. Refractive error in Myanmar. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(9):1642–1643. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.018
  • Collins RS, Berg GE. Forensic application of optical correction. Optometry. 2008;79(4):203–207.
  • Arnold SL, Arnold AW, Sprano JH, Arnold RW. Performance of the 2WIN photoscreener with “CR” strabismus estimation in high risk patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:195–203. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.016
  • Guo H, Atchison DA. Subjective blur limits for cylinder. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(8):E549–559. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181e61b8f
  • Pearce MG. Clinical outcomes following the dispensing of ready-made and recycled spectacles: a systematic literature review. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97(3):225–233.
  • Miller JM. Clinical applications of power vectors. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(6):599–602. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6a211
  • Fu D, Ding X, Shang J, Yu Z, Zhou X. Accuracy of WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction and cycloplegic refraction in hyperopia measurement. TVST. 2020;9(11):5. doi:10.1167/tvst.9.11.5
  • Wesner MF, Young FA. Comparison of subjective lens preference to objective refractive error measurements in pigtail macaques. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986;63(3):193–197. doi:10.1097/00006324-198603000-00005
  • Ramke J, Du Toit R, Brian G. An assessment of recycled spectacles donated to a developing country. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34(7):671–676. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01306.x
  • Brown WL. Revisions to tolerances in cylinder axis and in progressive addition lens power in ANSI Z80.1-2005. Optometry. 2006;77(7):343–349. doi:10.1016/j.optm.2006.04.108
  • Arnold RW, Davis B, Arnold LE, Rowe KS, Davis JM. Calibration and validation of nine objective vision screeners with contact lens-induced anisometropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2013;50(3):184–190. doi:10.3928/01913913-20130402-02
  • Jenkins DG, Quintana-Ascencio PF, Han G. A solution to minimum sample size for regressions. PLoS One. 2020;15(2):e0229345. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229345
  • Shane TS, Shi W, Schiffman JC, Lee RK. Used glasses versus ready-made spectacles for the treatment of refractive error. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012;43(3):235–240. doi:10.3928/15428877-20120223-02
  • Wang CY, Zhang G, Tang B, et al. A randomized noninferiority trial of wearing adjustable glasses versus standard and ready-made spectacles among Chinese schoolchildren: wearability and evaluation of adjustable refraction III. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(1):27–37. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.08.002