3,648
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Smartphones-Based Assistive Technology: Accessibility Features and Apps for People with Visual Impairment, and its Usage, Challenges, and Usability Testing

, &
Pages 311-322 | Published online: 27 Nov 2021

References

  • Bourne R, Steinmetz JD, Flaxman S, et al. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e130–43. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3
  • Assi L, Rosman L, Chamseddine F, et al. Eye health and quality of life: an umbrella review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10:8. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037648
  • Senjam S S. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on people living with visual disability. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:1367–1370. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_1513_20
  • World Health Organization, Geneva EBM 139th S. Improving access to assistive technology, the need for assistive technology. 2016.
  • The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html. Accessed July 20, 2021.
  • The United Nation Sustainable Development Goal, leave no one behind. Available from: https://unsdg.un.org/2030-agenda/universal-values/leave-no-one-behind. Accessed August 16, 2021.
  • Dockery DM, Krzystolik MG. The use of mobile applications as low-vision aids: a pilot study. R I Med J. 2020;103:69–72.
  • Warnars HL, Nicholas N, Raihan M, Ramadhan A, Mantoro T, Wan Adnan WA. Mobile application for the blind and their family. TEM J. 2021;10:1039–1044. doi:10.18421/TEM103-05
  • Elgendy M, Sik-Lanyi C, Kelemen A. Making shopping easy for people with visual impairment using mobile assistive technologies. Appl Sci. 2019;9:1061. doi:10.3390/app9061061
  • Phillips M, Proulx MJ. Social interaction without vision: an assessment of assistive technology for the visually impaired. Technol Innov. 2019;20:85–93. doi:10.21300/20.1-2.2018.85
  • Punchoojit L, Hongwarittorrn N. Usability studies on mobile user interface design patterns: a systematic literature review. Adv Human Comp Interact. 2017;2017:22. doi:10.1155/2017/6787504
  • Dicke C, Wolf K, Tal Y. Foogue: eyes-free interaction for smartphones. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; 2010:455–457.
  • Abu D, Pontelli E. PontelliEnrico. Non-visual navigation of spreadsheets. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2013;12:143–159. doi:10.1007/s10209-012-0272-1
  • Ahmed F, Islam MA, Borodin Y, Ramakrishnan IV. Assistive web browsing with touch interfaces. ASSETS’10 - Proc 12th Int ACM SIGACCESS Conf Comput Access; 2010:235–236.
  • Bigham JP, Prince CM, Ladner RE. WebAnywhere: a screen reader on-the-go. W4A’08 Proc 2008 Int Cross-Disciplinary Conf Web Access W4A. Assoc Comput Machine. 2008;73–82. doi:10.1145/1368044.1368060
  • Hakobyan L, Lumsden J, O’Sullivan D, Bartlett H. Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58:513–528. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.10.004
  • Martiniello N, Eisenbarth W, Lehane C, et al. Exploring the use of smartphones and tablets among people with visual impairments: are mainstream devices replacing the use of traditional visual aids? Assist Technol. 2019;1–12. doi:10.1080/10400435.2019.1682084
  • IDC - smartphone market share - OS. Available from: https://www.idc.com/promo/smartphone-market-share. Accessed July 12, 2021.
  • Android apps on google play. Available from: https://play.google.com/store/apps/collection/cluster. Accessed July 09, 2021.
  • Crossland MD, Silva RS, Macedo AF. Smartphone, tablet computer and e-reader use by people with vision impairment. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34:552–557. doi:10.1111/opo.12136
  • Senjam SS. Smartphones as assistive technology for visual impairment. Eye. 2021;35:1–3.
  • Product narrative: digital assistive technology, chapter 1: mobile phone as assistive technology, AT2030 programme; 2020. Available from: https://at2030.org/. Accessed June 23, 2021.
  • Product narrative: digital assistive technology, chapter 2: screen reader software | AT2030 programme; 2020. Available from: https://at2030.org/. Accessed November 23, 2021.
  • Robinson JL, Braimah Avery V, Chun R, Pusateri G, Jay WM. Usage of accessibility options for the iPhone and iPad in a visually impaired population. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32:163–171. doi:10.3109/08820538.2015.1045151
  • Irvine D, Zemke A, Pusateri G, Gerlach L, Chun R, Jay WM. Tablet and smartphone accessibility features in the low vision rehabilitation. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2014;38:53–59. doi:10.3109/01658107.2013.874448
  • The smartphone: a revolution for the blind and visually impaired! - Inclusive city maker. Available from: https://www.inclusivecitymaker.com/the-smartphone-a-revolution-for-the-blind-and-visually-impaired/. Accessed June 6, 2021.
  • Rana MM, Rana U. Accessibility evaluation of iphone’s user interface for visually impaired. Proceedings of Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications; 2009: 164–167.
  • Smartphones critical to the daily lives of people who are blind or visually impaired, finds strategy analytics | Business Wire. Available from: https://americanonlinenews.net/2021/01/07/smartphones-critical-to-the-daily-lives-of-people-who-are-blind-or-visually-impaired-finds-strategy-analytics/. Accesed June 2, 2021.
  • Abraham CH, Boadi-Kusi B, Morny EKA, Agyekum P. Smartphone usage among people living with severe visual impairment and blindness. Assist Technol. 2021;1–8. doi:10.1080/10400435.2021.1907485
  • Borges WF, Mendes EG. Usability of assistive technology applications by people with low vision. Rev Bras Educ Espec. 2018;24:477–494.
  • Griffin-Shirley N, Banda DR, Ajuwon PM, et al. A survey on the use of mobile applications for people who are visually impaired. J Vis Impair Blind. 2017;111:307–323. doi:10.1177/0145482X1711100402
  • Fuglerud KS, Tjøstheim I, Gunnarsson BR, et al. Use of social media by people with visual impairments: usage levels, attitudes and barriers. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Vol. 7382 LNCS. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer:2012;565–572.
  • Morten Tollefsen ØD. A paper about the disabled and the use of social media; 2011. Available from: http://www.medialt.no/pub/info_pdf/status_social_media_2010_english.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2021.
  • Fuglerud KS, Chan R, Sørli HT. Studying older people with visual impairments using mainstream smartphones with the aid of the Ezismart keypad and apps. In: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 256. IOS Press; 2018:802–810.
  • Senjam S, Manna S, Vashist P, Gupta V, Varughese S, Tandon R. Tele-rehabilitation for visually challenged students during COVID-19 pandemic: lesson learned. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:722. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2527_20
  • The World Bank. People with disability in India, from commitments to outcome. Chapter 4 educ. Available from: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/577801468259486686. Accessed June 1, 2021.
  • Sankhi P, Sandnes FE. A glimpse into smartphone screen reader use among blind teenagers in rural Nepal. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2020. doi:10.1080/1748310720201818298.
  • Waseem Muhammad Zia M. Academic use of smart phones for social development of visually impaired students of University of Karachi: a study of android smartphone applications by VI students. Syeda Shireen Zehra Miss; 2019. Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3026/. Accessed August 10, 2021.
  • The Hans India. Using mobile phones to educate visually-impaired students. Available from: https://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Education-and-Careers/2018-12-19/Using-mobile-phones-to-educate-visually-impaired-students/461167. Accessed August 17, 2021.
  • Sugawara AT, Ramos VD, Alfieri FM, Battistella LR. Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:716–723. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1425748
  • Pape TLB, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:5–20. doi:10.1080/09638280110066235
  • Boiani JAM, Barili SRM, Medola FO, Sandnes FE. On the non-disabled perceptions of four common mobility devices in Norway: a comparative study based on semantic differentials. Technol Disabil. 2019;31:15–25. doi:10.3233/TAD-190226
  • World health Organization. Assistive technology, key facts. Geneva; 2018. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology. Accessed August 9, 2021.
  • Mobile price in India, mobile phones price list in India; 2021. Available from: https://www.91mobiles.com/upcoming-mobiles-in-india. Accessed August 12, 2021.
  • Pal J, Vyas V, Vartak A, et al. Local-language digital information in India: challenges and opportunities for screen readers. ACM Int Conf Proc Ser. 2012;318–325. doi:10.1145/2160673.2160712
  • Number of smartphone users in India 2015–2022 statista. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/467163/forecast-of-smartphone-users-in-india. Accessed August 2, 2021.
  • Fuhrer MJ. Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:528–535. doi:10.1097/00002060-200107000-00013
  • Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities | Giulio Lancioni | Springer. Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781489980281. Accessed August 17, 2021.
  • Ee Wong M, Tan K. Practice reports teaching the benefits of smart phone technology to blind consumers: exploring the potential of the IPhone. J Visual Impair Blind. 2012;106(10):646–650.
  • Ari IA, Ari IA, Inan FA. Assistive technologies for students with disabilities: a survey of access and …. Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2010;9:40–45.
  • Zhou L, Zhou L, Parker AT, Smith DW, Griffin-Shirley N. Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: challenges and …. J Vis Impair Blind. 2011;105:197–210. doi:10.1177/0145482X1110500402
  • Bin TST, Berry AB. Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: a resource for teachers, parents, and students. Rural Special Educ Quart. 2018;37:219–227. doi:10.1177/8756870518773397
  • Kelly SM, Muthiah MD, Koh T. Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: findings from a national survey. Transplantation. 2019;103:470–480. doi:10.1177/0145482X0910300805
  • Vashistha A, Cutrell E, Dell N, Anderson R. Social media platforms for low-income blind people in India. ASSETS 2015 - Proc 17th Int ACM SIGACCESS Conf Comput; 2015:259–272.
  • Rosenbaum S. Usability evaluations versus usability testing: when and why? IEEE Trans Prof Commun. 1989;32:210–216. doi:10.1109/47.44533
  • Van Den Haak MJ, De Jong MDT, Schellens PJ. Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behav Inf Technol. 2003;22:339–351. doi:10.1080/0044929031000
  • Chee W. Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud | by Weiyan Chee | medium. Available from: https://medium.com/@cheeweiyan. Accessed August 10, 2021.
  • Kim HK, Han SH, Park J, Park J. The interaction experiences of visually impaired people with assistive technology: a case study of smartphones. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016;55:22–33. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2016.07.002
  • Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009;62:(10)e1–e34.