Acuity Comparison Methods via Timed Test-Retest Precision of Matching-Card e-ETDRS Compared to PDI Check in Treated Amblyopes and Superb Normals

References

• Beck RW. Clinical research in pediatric ophthalmology: the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13:337–340.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu C, Hunter DG. Amblyopia: diagnostic and therapeutic options. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(1):175–184. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian V, Jost RM, Birch EE. A quantitative study of fixation stability in amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(3):1998–2003. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-11054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedamurthy I, Suttle CM, Alexander J, Asper LJ. Interocular interactions during acuity measurement in children and adults, and in adults with amblyopia. Vision Res. 2007;47(2):179–188. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter SA, Edwards AR, Arnold RW, et al. Treatment of strabismic amblyopia with refractive correction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(6):1060–1063. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEDIG. A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):268–278. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.3.268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Kushner BJ, Moshkovitz A, Belkin M, Yehezkel O; CureSight Pivotal Trial G. An eye-tracking-based dichoptic home treatment for amblyopia: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stager D, Everett M, Birch E. Comparison of crowding bar and linear optotype acuity in amblyopia. Am Orthopt J. 1990;40(1):51–56. doi:10.1080/0065955X.1990.11981816
   Google Scholar
• Birch EE, Jost RM, Hudgins LA, Morale SE, Donohoe M, Kelly KR. Dichoptic and monocular visual acuity in amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;242:209–214. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2022.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KA, Arnold AW, Sprano JH, Arnold SL, Arnold RW. Performance of a quick screening version of Nintendo 3DS “PDI check” game on patients with ocular suppression. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2019;56(4):234–237. doi:10.3928/01913913-20190502-01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huurneman B, Boonstra FN. Assessment of near visual acuity in 0–13 year olds with normal and low vision: a systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):215. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0386-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wen J, Yang B, Li X, Cui J, Wang L. Automated assessment of grating acuity in infants and toddlers using an eye-tracking system. J Vis. 2022;22(12):8. doi:10.1167/jov.22.12.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlen T, Arnold R. Pediatric non-refractive vision screening with EyeSwift, PDI check and blinq. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;16:375–384. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S344751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone-based visual acuity test (peek acuity) for clinical practice and community-based fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):930–937. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellsmith KN, Gale MJ, Yang S, et al. Validation of home visual acuity tests for telehealth in the COVID-19 era. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022;140(5):465–471. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moke PS, Turpin AH, Beck RW, et al. Computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132(6):903–909. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01256-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch EE, Strauber SF, Beck RW, Holmes JM. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years. J AAPOS. 2009;13(1):75–78. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsou BC, Bressler NM. Visual acuity reporting in clinical research publications. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(6):651–653. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PR, Kalwarowsky S, Braddick OJ, Atkinson J, Nardini M. Optimizing the rapid measurement of detection thresholds in infants. J Vis. 2015;15(11):2. doi:10.1167/15.11.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck RW, Moke PS, Turpin AH, et al. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(2):194–205. doi:10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01825-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer KK, Bradley AP, Wilson SJ. Conducting shorter VEP tests to estimate visual acuity via assessment of SNR. Doc Ophthalmol. 2013;126(1):21–28. doi:10.1007/s10633-012-9355-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris FL 3rd, Bailey I. Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: guidelines from the eye care technology forum. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(1):181–182. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30742-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaikitmongkol V, Nanegrungsunk O, Patikulsila D, Ruamviboonsuk P, Bressler NM. Repeatability and agreement of visual acuity using the ETDRS number chart, Landolt C chart, or ETDRS alphabet chart in eyes with or without sight-threatening diseases. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018;136(3):286–290. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.6290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo HK, Kuo MT, Tiong IS, Wu PC, Chen YJ, Chen CH. Visual acuity as measured with Landolt C chart and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(4):601–605. doi:10.1007/s00417-010-1461-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker R, Teichler G, Graf M. [Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases] Vergleich von Landoltring- und ETDRS-Buchstaben-Sehscharfe bei Augengesunden und Patienten mit unterschiedlichen Augenerkrankungen. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011;228(10):864–867. German. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1281758
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koenig S, Tonagel F, Schiefer U, Bach M, Heinrich SP. Assessing visual acuity across five disease types: ETDRS charts are faster with clinical outcome comparable to Landolt Cs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252(7):1093–1099. doi:10.1007/s00417-014-2670-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruamviboonsuk P, Tiensuwan M, Kunawut C, Masayaanon P. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(4):662–669. doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00394-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moganeswari D, Thomas J, Srinivasan K, Jacob GP. Test re-test reliability and validity of different visual acuity and stereoacuity charts used in preschool children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(11):NC01–NC05. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2015/14407.6747
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raasch TW, Bailey IL, Bullimore MA. Repeatability of visual acuity measurement. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(5):342–348. doi:10.1097/00006324-199805000-00024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King TS, Chinchilli VM. Robust estimators of the concordance correlation coefficient. J Biopharm Stat. 2001;11(3):83–105. doi:10.1081/BIP-100107651
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toner KN, Lynn MJ, Candy TR, Hutchinson AK. The handy eye check: a mobile medical application to test visual acuity in children. J AAPOS. 2014;18(3):258–260. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King TS, Chinchilli VM. A generalized concordance correlation coefficient for continuous and categorical data. Stat Med. 2001;20(14):2131–2147. doi:10.1002/sim.845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HR. Racial variations in vision. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;113(1):62–80. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold RW. Digital values for alpha acuities. JPOS. 2021;58(2):132–135. doi:10.3928/01913913-20210111-02
   Google Scholar
• Anstice NS, Jacobs RJ, Simkin SK, Thomson M, Thompson B, Collins AV. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of kay pictures, lea symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170839. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor A, King C, Milling A, Tidbury L. Using a computerised staircase and incremental optotype sizes to improve visual acuity assessment accuracy. Br Ir Orthopt J. 2022;18(1):93–100. doi:10.22599/bioj.271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kushner BJ, Lucchese NJ, Morton GV. Grating visual acuity with teller cards compared with Snellen visual acuity in literate patients. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(4):485–493. doi:10.1001/archopht.1995.01100040107035
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett-Itzhaki G, Barnett-Itzhaki Z, Ela-Dalman N. The dynamic optotype (Dyop): a novel visual acuity test for use in children. J AAPOS. 2021;25(5):285e1–285 e5. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2021.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PR, Kalwarowsky S, Atkinson J, Braddick OJ, Nardini M. Automated measurement of resolution acuity in infants using remote eye-tracking. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(12):8102–8110. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice ML, Leske DA, Holmes JM. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(2):278–282. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah N, Dakin SC, Whitaker HL, Anderson RS. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(3):1386–1392. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-13340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim LA, Frost NA, Powell RJ, Hewson P. Comparison of the ETDRS logMAR, ‘compact reduced logMar’ and Snellen charts in routine clinical practice. Eye. 2010;24(4):673–677. doi:10.1038/eye.2009.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briones LJ, Gomez JP, Leuenberger EF. The Philippine peso bill as an alternative near visual acuity chart in Filipino eyes: a pilot study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2022;16:3437–3445. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S376818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiraset N, Poonyathalang A, Padungkiatsagul T, Deeyai M, Vichitkunakorn P, Vanikieti K. Comparison of visual acuity measurement using three methods: standard ETDRS chart, near chart and a smartphone-based eye chart application. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:859–869. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S304272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke MD, Winter PA, McKenney KC, et al. An innovative visual acuity chart for urgent and primary care settings: validation of the Runge near vision card. Eye. 2019;33(7):1104–1110. doi:10.1038/s41433-019-0372-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein E, Williams JS, Brown JR, Bylykbashi E, Stinnett SS. Teleophthalmology: evaluation of phone-based visual acuity in a pediatric population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;221:199–206. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson V, Clifford-Donaldson CE, Miller JM, Garvey KA, Harvey EM. A comparison of lea symbol vs ETDRS letter distance visual acuity in a population of young children with a high prevalence of astigmatism. J AAPOS. 2009;13(3):253–257. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2009.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treacy MP, Hurst TP, Conway M, et al. The early treatment in diabetic retinopathy study chart compared with the tumbling-E and Landolt-C. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(5):1062–3 e1. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff A, Repka MX, Kaminski BM, Holmes JM. Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2011;15(4):342–344. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar