3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics

References

• SchubertCVan LangeveldMCDonosoLAInnovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organsBr J Ophthalmol20149815916124288392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartelliNSerranoCvan den BrinkHAdvantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic reviewSurgery201615961485150026832986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac-ThiongJMLabelleHRoozeMFeipelVAubinCEEvaluation of a transpedicular drill guide for pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spineEur Spine J20031254254712783286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuSXuYQLuWWA novel patient-specific navigational template for cervical pedicle screw placementSpine20093426E959E96620010385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HananouchiTSaitoMKoyamaTSuganoNYoshikawaHTailor-based surgical guide reduces incidence of outliers of cup placementClin Orthop Relat Res20104681088109519629605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MiyakeJMuraseTMoritomoHSugamotoKYoshikawaHDistal radius osteotomy with volar locking plates based on computer simulationClin Orthop Relat Res201146961766177321203873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NgVYDeClaireJHBerendKRGulickBCLombardiAVJrImproved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKAClin Orthop Relat Res201247019910721809150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongKCKumtaSMSzeKYWongCMUse of a patient-specific CAD/CAM surgical jig in extremity bone tumor resection and custom prosthetic reconstructionComput Aided Surg201217628429323030839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BullerLSmithTBryanJKlikaABarsoumWInnottiJPThe use of patient-specific instrumentation improves the accuracy of acetabular component placementJ Arthroplasty20132863163623498350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TakeyasuYOkaKMiyakeJKataokaTMoritomoHMuraseTPreoperative, computer simulation-based, three-dimensional corrective osteotomy for cubitus varus deformity with use of a custom-designed surgical deviceJ Bone Joint Surg Am2013209522e17324257673
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GouinFPaulLOdriGACartiauxOComputer-assisted planning and patient-specific instruments for bone tumor resection within the pelvis: a series of 11 patientsSarcoma2014 Article ID 8427099
   Google Scholar
• BaauwMvan HellemondtGGvan HooffMLSpruitMThe accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hipBone Joint J201597-B678078526033057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FanHFuJLiXImplantation of customized 3-D printed titanium prosthesis in limb salvage surgery: a case series and review of the literatureWorld J Surg Oncol20151330826537339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RengierFMehndirattaAvon Tengg-KobligkH3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applicationsInt J Comput Assist Radiol Surg2010533534120467825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimGBLeeSKimHThree-dimensional printing: basic principles and applications in medicine and radiologyKorean J Radiol201617218219726957903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UnwinPSEshraghiACustom implantsRitaccoLEMilanoFEChaoEComputer-Assisted Musculoskeletal Surgery: Thinking and Executing in 3DSwitzerlandSpringer2016181198
   Google Scholar
• KentDMHaywardRALimitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratificationJAMA20072981209121217848656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NealMLKerckhoffsRCurrent progress in patient-specific modelingBrief Bioinform201011111112619955236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LepistoJArmandMArmigerRSPeriacetabular osteotomy in adult hip dysplasia – developing a computer aided real-time biomechanical guiding system (BGS)Suom Ortoped Traumatol20083118619020490364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ArmigerRSArmandMTallrothKLepistoJMearsSCThree-dimensional mechanical evaluation of joint contact pressure in 12 periacetabular osteotomy patients with 10-year follow-upActa Orthop20098015516119404795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LafonYLafageVDuboussetJSkalliWIntraoperative three-dimensional correction during rod rotation techniqueSpine20093451251919247171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangXAubinCELabelleHCrandallDBiomechanical modelling of a direct vertebral translation instrumentation system: preliminary resultsStud Health Technol Inform200814012813218810013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WongKCKumtaSMGeelNVDemolJOne-step reconstruction with a 3D-printed, biomechanically evaluated custom implant after complex pelvic tumor resectionComput Aided Surg2015201142326290317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DalrympleNCPrasadSRFreckletonMWChintapalliKNInformatics in radiology (info-RAD): introduction to the language of three-dimensional imaging with multidetector CTRadio-Graphics20052514091428
   Google Scholar
• WongKCKumtaSMAntonioGETseLFImage fusion for computer-assisted bone tumor surgeryClin Orthop Relat Res2008466102533254118648902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TraceAPOrtizDDealARadiology’s emerging role in 3-D printing applications in health careJ Am Coll Radiol201613785686227236288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownGAMilnerBFiroozbakhshKApplication of computer-generated stereolithography and interpositioning template in acetabular fractures: a report of eight casesJ Orthop Trauma200216534735211972079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HursonCTanseyAO’DonnchadhaBNicholsonPRiceJMcElwainJRapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fracturesInjury200738101158116217884058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NiikuraTSugimotoMLeeSYTactile surgical navigation system for complex acetabular fracture surgeryOrthopaedics201437237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimHNLiuXNNohKCUse of a real-size 3D-printed model as a preoperative and intraoperative tool for minimally invasive plating of comminuted midshaft clavicle fracturesJ Orthop Surg Res2015109126054648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VoletiPBHamulaMJBaldwinKDLeeGCCurrent data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplastyJ Arthroplasty20142991709171224961893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuarinoJTennysonSMcCainGBondLSheaKKingHRapid prototyping technology for surgeries of the pediatric spine and pelvis: benefits analysisJ Pediatr Orthop200727895596018209623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StarosolskiZAKanJHRosenfeldSDKrishnamurthyRAnnapragadaAApplication of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disordersPediatr Radiol20144421624202430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CavaignacEPailhéRLaumondGEvaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysisInt Orthop20153981541155225300397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KunzMBalaketheeswaranSEllisRERudanJFThe influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing proceduresInt J Comput Assist Radiol Surg201510671772625861892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeuwenJAGrøgaardBNordslettenLRöhrlSMComparison of planned and achieved implant position in total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific positioning guidesActa Orthop20141116
   Google Scholar
• WongKCSzeKYWongIOWongCMKumtaSMPatient-specific instrument can achieve same accuracy with less resection time than navigation assistance in periacetabular pelvic tumor surgery: a cadaveric studyInt J Comput Assist Radiol Surg201611230731626148694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RyanGPanditAApatsidisDPFabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopaedic applicationsBiomaterials2006272651267016423390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-HerediaMAGoyenvalleEAguadoEBone growth in rapid prototyped porous titanium implantsJ Biomed Mater Res A200885366467317876801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarryssonOLACansizogluOMarcellin-LittleDJCormierDRWestHAIIDirect metal fabrication of titanium implants with tailored materials and mechanical properties using electron beam melting technologyMater Sci Eng C200828366373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeinPMüllerLKörnerCSingerRFMüllerFACellular Ti–6Al–4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam meltingActa Biomater200841536154418467197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarryssonOHosniYNayfehJCustom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral component case studyBMC Musculoskelet Disord200789117854508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WongKCKumtaSMChiuKHComputer assisted pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction with a custom-made prosthesis using an innovative adaptation and its validationComput Aided Surg200712422523217786598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KosteckiKPEEK usage climbs for devicesMed Des2011 Available from: http://medicaldesign.com/materials/peek-usage-climbs-devicesAccessed on September 4, 2016
   Google Scholar
• LiCSVannabouathongCSpragueSBhandariMThe use of carbon-fiber-reinforced (CFR) PEEK material in orthopedic implants: a systematic reviewClin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord20158334525780341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KerstenRFvan GaalenSMde GastAÖnerFCPolyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in cervical applications: a systematic reviewSpine J20151561446146024374100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeJWChoDW3D Printing technology over a drug delivery for tissue engineeringCurr Pharm Des201521121606161725594413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DongJZhangSLiuHLiXLiuYDuYNovel alternative therapy for spinal tuberculosis during surgery: reconstructing with anti-tuberculosis bioactivity implantsExpert Opin Drug Deliv20141129924328922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar