35
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Perception of risk and benefit in patient-centered communication and care

Pages 39-48 | Published online: 26 May 2011

References

  • Flach SD, McCoy KD, Vaughn TE, Ward MM, Bootsmiller BJ, Doebbeling BN. Does patient-centered care improve provision of preventive services? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(10):1019–1026.
  • Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. JFam Pract. 2000;49(9):796–804.
  • Reyna VF. A theory of medical decision making and health: fuzzy trace theory. MedDecisMaking. 2008;28(6):850–865.
  • Lloyd AJ. Communicating and understanding risk. The extent of patients’ understanding of the risk of treatments. Qual Health Care. 2001;10(Suppl 1):i14-i18.
  • Mattson M. Toward a reconceptualization of communication cues to action in the Health Belief Model: HIV test counseling. Commun Monogr. 1999;66(3):240–265.
  • Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta- analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin. 2007;133(4):673–693.
  • Hutchison AJ, Breckon JD, Johnston LH. Physical activity behavior change interventions based on the transtheoretical model: a systematic review. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36(5):829–845.
  • Sirur R, Richardson J, Wishart L, Hanna S. The role of theory in increasing adherence to prescribed practice. Physiother Can. 2009;61(2):68–77.
  • Van Besien K, Koshy M, Anderson-Shaw L, et al. Allogenic stem cell transplantation for sickle cell disease. A study of patients’ decisions. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001;28(6):545–549.
  • Kontodimopoulos N, Niakas D. Overcoming inherent problems of preference-based techniques for measuring health benefits: an empirical study in the context of kidney transplantation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:3.
  • Miller L, Gur M. Religiousness and sexual responsibility in adolescent girls. JAdolesc Health. 2002;31(5):401–406.
  • Nonnemaker JM, McNeely CA, Blum RW. Public and private domains of religiosity and adolescent health risk behaviors: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(11):2049–2054.
  • Gandhi R, Razak F, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Ethnicity and patient’s perception of risk in joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 2008;35(8):1664–1667.
  • Kwok C, Sullivan G, Cant R. The role of culture in breast health practices among Chinese-Australian women. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):268–276.
  • Goto R, Takahashi Y, Nishimura S, Ida T. A cohort study to examine whether time and risk preference is related to smoking cessation success. Addiction. 2009;104(6):1018–1024.
  • Song AV Morrell HE, Cornell JL, et al. Perceptions of smoking-related risks and benefits as predictors of adolescent smoking initiation. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(3):487–492.
  • Tsui W, Pierre K, Massel D. Patient reperfusion preferences in acute myocardial infarction: mortality versus stroke, benefits versus costs, high technology versus drugs. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21(5):423–431.
  • Burke TM, Abramovitch R, Zlotkin S. Children’s understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research. J Med Ethics. 2005;31(12):715–720.
  • Bennett JE, Sumner W 2nd, Downs SM, Jaffe DM. Parents’ utilities for outcomes of occult bacteremia. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(1):43–48.
  • Sypsa V Livanios T, Psichogiou M, et al. Public perceptions in relation to intention to receive pandemic influenza vaccination in a random population sample: evidence from a cross-sectional telephone survey. Euro Surveill. 2009;14(49):19437.
  • O’Brien BJ, Elswood J, Calin A. Willingness to accept risk in the treatment of rheumatic disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990;44(3):249–252.
  • Thompson MS. Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(4):392–396.
  • Kennedy ED, To T, Steinhart AH, Detsky A, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, McLeod RS. Do patients consider postoperative maintenance therapy for Crohn’s disease worthwhile? Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14(2):224–235.
  • Povar GJ, Mantell M, Morris LA. Patients’ therapeutic preferences in an ambulatory care setting. J Public Health. 1984;74(12):1395–1397.
  • Hartjes LB, Baumann LC, Henriques JB. Travel health risk perceptions and prevention behaviors of US study abroad students. J Travel Med. 2009;16(5):338–343.
  • Hakim A. E-prescribing and primary noncompliance: physician and patient experience. Prof Case Manag. 2010;15(2):62–67.
  • Baiardini I, Braido F, Giardini A, et al. Adherence to treatment: assessment of an unmet need in asthma. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(4):218–223.
  • Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(13):1414–1420.
  • Singh JA, Sloan JA, Atherton PJ, et al. Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(9):688–696.
  • Patel SR, Bakken S. Preferences for participation in decision making among ethnically diverse patients with anxiety and depression. Community Ment Health J. 2010;46(5):466–473.
  • Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136.
  • Engel GL. The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry. 1980;137(5):535–544.
  • Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221–2224.
  • Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(3):301–312.
  • Elwyn G, Edwards A, editors. Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–692.
  • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651–661.
  • Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O’Brien MA. Cultural influences on the physician-patient encounter: the case of shared treatment decisionmaking. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):262–267.
  • Murray E, Charles C, Gafni A. Shared decision-making in primary care: tailoring the Charles et al model to fit the context of general practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62(2):205–211.
  • Elit L, Charles C, Gold I, et al. Women’s perceptions about treatment decision making for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;88(2):89–95.
  • Dolan JG. Shared decision-making - transferring research into practice: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):418–425.
  • Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):526–535.
  • Légaré F, Ratté S, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;12(5):CD006732.
  • Ampt AJ, Amoroso C, Harris MF, McKenzie SH, Rose VK, Taggart JR. Attitudes, norms and controls influencing lifestyle risk factor management in general practice. BMCFam Pract. 2009;10:59.
  • Smith H, Gooding S, Brown R, Frew A. Evaluation of readability and accuracy of information leaflets in general practice for patients with asthma. BMJ. 1998;317(7153):264–265.
  • Cronin M, O’Hanlon S, O’Connor M. Readability level of patient information leaflets for older people. Ir J Med Sci. 2011;180(1):139–142.
  • Nicholls S, Hankins M, Hooley C, Smith H. A survey of the quality and accuracy of information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from UK general practices and community pharmacies. JEur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(5):566–569.
  • González HM, Vega WA, Tarraf W. Health care quality perceptions among foreign-born Latinos and the importance of speaking the same language. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010;23(6):745–752.
  • Nápoles AM, Gregorich SE, Santoyo-Olsson J, O’Brien H, Stewart AL. Interpersonal processes of care and patient satisfaction: do associations differ by race, ethnicity, and language? Health Serv Res. 2009;44(4):1326–1344.
  • Misselbrook D, Armstrong D. Patients’ responses to risk information about the benefits of treating hypertension. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(465):276–279.
  • Neeskens P. Evidence, risk and the patient. Aust Prescr. 2007;30(2):47–50.
  • Schwartz PH, Meslin EM. The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(6):867–870.
  • Halvorsen PA, Selmer R, Kristiansen IS. Different ways to describe the benefits of risk-reducing treatments: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(12):848–856.
  • Paling J. Strategies to help patients understand risks. BMJ. 2003;327(7417):745–748.
  • Halvorsen PA, Kristiansen IS. Decisions on drug therapies by numbers needed to treat: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(10):1140–1146.
  • Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B, Chan L, Jackson R, Wells S, Kenealy T. Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(3):213–217.
  • Goldman RE, Parker DR, Eaton CB, et al. Patients’ perceptions of cholesterol, cardiovascular disease risk, and risk communication strategies. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(3):205–212.
  • Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. Who profits from visual aids: overcoming challenges in people’s understanding of risks. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(7):1019–1025.
  • Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A. The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: a comparison between text, tables, and graphics. J Health Commun. 2010;15(5):487–501.
  • Thomson RG, Eccles MP, Steen IN, et al. A patient decision aid to support shared decision-making on anti-thrombotic treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(3):216–223.
  • Bickmore TW, Pfeifer LM, Byron D, et al. Usability of conversational agents by patients with inadequate health literacy: evidence from two clinical trials. J Health Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 2):197–210.
  • Protheroe J, Fahey T, Montgomery AA, Peters TJ. Effects of patients’ preferences on the treatment of atrial fibrillation: observational study of patient-based decision analysis. BMJ. 2000;320(7246):1380–1384.
  • Lenert LA, Ziegler J, Lee T, Unfred C, Mahmoud R. The risks of multimedia methods: effects of actor’s race and gender on preferences for health states. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7(2):177–185.
  • O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;8(3):CD001431.
  • Ellis DA, Hopkin JM, Leitch AG, Crofton J. “Doctors’ orders”: controlled trial of supplementary, written information for patients. BMJ. 1979;1(6161):456.
  • U SA Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
  • Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C; for the National Center for Education Statistics. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. (NCES 2006–483) Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2006.
  • Australian Bureau of Stati stics. Health literacy, Australia. Cat nr 4233.0. Canberra, Australia: Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2006.
  • Wolf MS, Williams MV, Parker RM, Parikh NS, Nowlan AW, Baker DW. Patients’ shame and attitudes toward discussing the results of literacy screening. J Health Commun. 2007;12(8):721–732.
  • Committee on Health Literacy and Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, Institute of Medicine. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2004.
  • Halvorsen PA, Kristiansen IS, Aasland OG, Forde OH. Medical doctors’ perception of the “number needed to treat” (NNT.) A survey of doctors’ recommendations for two therapies with different NNT. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003;21(3):162–166.
  • Rakow T, Bull C. Same patient, different advice: a study into why doctors vary. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(6):497–502.
  • Montori VM, Leung TW, Devereaux PJ, et al. Can contraindications compromise evidence-based, patient-centered clinical practice? Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;13(1):e92-e101.
  • Street RL Jr, Gordon H, Haidet P. Physicians’ communication and perceptions of patients: is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor? Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(3):586–598.
  • Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15(1):25–38.
  • Beach MC, Roter DL, Wang NY, Duggan PS, Cooper LA. Are physicians’ attitudes of respect accurately perceived by patients and associated with more positive communication behaviors? Patient Educ Couns. 2006;62(3):347–354.
  • Hou J, Shim M. The role of provider-patient communication and trust in online sources in Internet use for health-related activities. J Health Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 3):186–199.
  • Ruelaz AR, Diefenbach P, Simon B, Lanto A, Arterburn D, Shekelle PG. Perceived barriers to weight management in primary care - perspectives of patients and providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(4):518–522.
  • Westby MD, Backman CL. Patient and health professional views on rehabilitation practices and outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:119.
  • Street RL Jr, Haidet P. How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients’ health beliefs. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(1):21–27.