500
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Whole Slide Imaging Integration with Lab Information Systems, a Study of the Requirements, Processes and Procedures Enabling a Reporting-Based Workflow

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1-11 | Received 07 Sep 2022, Accepted 28 Dec 2022, Published online: 17 Jan 2023

References

  • Snead DR, Tsang YW, Meskiri A, et al. Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis. Histopathology. 2016;68(7):1063–1072. doi:10.1111/his.12879
  • Fraggetta F, Caputo A, Guglielmino R, et al. Guide for the rapid transition to a fully digital workflow: the “caltagirone example”. Diagnostics. 2021;11(10):1916. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11101916
  • Zarella MD, Bowman D, Aeffner F, et al. A practical guide to whole slide imaging: a white paper from the digital pathology association. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019;143(2):222–234. doi:10.5858/arpa.2018-0343-RA
  • Evans AJ, Bauer TW, Bui MM, et al. US Food and Drug Administration approval of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis: a key milestone is reached and new questions are raised. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(11):1383–1387. doi:10.5858/arpa.2017-0496-CP
  • Amin M, Sharma G, Parwani AV, et al. Integration of digital gross pathology images for enterprise-wide access. J Pathol Inform. 2012;3:10. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.93892
  • Fraggetta F, L’imperio V, Ameisen D, et al. Best practice recommendations for the implementation of a digital pathology workflow in the anatomic pathology laboratory by the European Society of digital and integrative pathology (ESDIP). Diagnostics. 2021;11(11):2167. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11112167
  • Cheng CL, Azhar R, Sng SH, et al. Enabling digital pathology in the diagnostic setting: navigating through the implementation journey in an academic medical centre. J Clin Pathol. 2016;69(9):784–792. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2015-203600
  • García-Rojo M. International clinical guidelines for the adoption of digital pathology: a review of technical aspects. Pathobiology. 2016;83(2–3):99–109. doi:10.1159/000441192
  • Evans AJ, Salama ME, Henricks WH, Pantanowitz L. Implementation of whole slide imaging for clinical purposes: issues to consider from the perspective of early adopters. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141(7):944–959. doi:10.5858/arpa.2016-0074-OA
  • Williams BJ, Bottoms D, Clark D, Treanor D. Future-proofing pathology part 2: building a business case for digital pathology. J Clin Pathol. 2019;72(3):198–205. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204926
  • Volynskaya Z, Chow H, Evans A, Wolff A, Lagmay-Traya C, Asa SL. Integrated pathology informatics enables high-quality personalized and precision medicine: digital pathology and beyond. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2018;142(3):369–382. doi:10.5858/arpa.2017-0139-OA
  • Aeffner F, Zarella MD, Buchbinder N, et al. Introduction to digital image analysis in whole-slide imaging: a white paper from the digital pathology association. J Pathol Inform. 2019;10:9. doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_82_18
  • Robboy SJ, Gupta S, Crawford JM, et al. The pathologist workforce in the United States: II. An interactive modeling tool for analyzing future qualitative and quantitative staffing demands for services. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(11):1413–1430. doi:10.5858/arpa.2014-0559-OA
  • Bick U, Lenzen H. PACS: the silent revolution. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(6):1152–1160. doi:10.1007/s003300050811
  • Mansoori B, Erhard KK, Sunshine JL. Picture archiving and communication system (PACS) implementation, integration & benefits in an integrated health system. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(2):229–235. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.009
  • van Diest PJ, Huisman A, van Ekris J, et al. Pathology image exchange: the Dutch digital pathology platform for exchange of whole-slide images for efficient teleconsultation, telerevision, and virtual expert panels. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019;3:1–7. doi:10.1200/CCI.18.00146
  • Lechleitner G, Pfeiffer KP, Wilhelmy I, Ball M. Cerner Millennium™: the Innsbruck experience. Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(1):08–15. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1634204