References
- SchneeweissSAvornJA review of uses of health care utilization databases for epidemiologic research on therapeuticsJ Clin Epidemiol200558432333715862718
- van WalravenCBennettCForsterAJAdministrative database research infrequently used validated diagnostic or procedural codesJ Clin Epidemiol201164101054105921474278
- JohnsonEKNelsonCPUtility and pitfalls in the use of administrative databases for outcomes assessmentJ Urol20131901171823608038
- QuanHLiBSaundersLDAssessing validity of ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data in recording clinical conditions in a unique dually coded databaseHealth Serv Res20084341424144118756617
- KhokharBJetteNMetcalfeASystematic review of validated case definitions for diabetes in ICD-9-coded and ICD-10-coded data in adult populationsBMJ Open201668e009952
- YoungsonEWelshRCKaulPMcAlisterFQuanHBakalJDefining and validating comorbidities and procedures in ICD-10 health data in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patientsMedicine (Baltimore)20169532e455427512881
- WhyteJLEngel-NitzNMTeitelbaumAGomez ReyGKallichJDAn evaluation of algorithms for identifying metastatic breast, lung, or colorectal cancer in administrative claims dataMed Care2015537e49e5723524464
- HowladerNNooneAKrapchoMSEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2013. Based on November 2015 SEER data submissionBethesda, MDNational Cancer Institute2016 Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/Accessed April 26, 2017
- American Cancer SocietyManaging cancer as a chronic illness2016 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/treatment/survivorshipduringan-daftertreatment/when-cancer-doesnt-go-awayAccessed October 20, 2016
- MeyerA-MCarpenterWRAbernethyAPStürmerTKosorokMRData for cancer comparative effectiveness researchCancer2012118215186519722517505
- AnthemCancer care quality program treatment pathways2017 Available from: https://anthem.aimoncology.com/pdf/pathways/Cancer_Pathways_Clinical_Detail.pdfAccessed June 16, 2017
- MeyerA-MBaschEBig data infrastructure for cancer outcomes research: implications for the practicing oncologistJ Oncol Pract201511320720825873058
- HsuehC-TLiuDWangHNovel biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, targeted therapy and clinical trialsBiomark Res201311124252729
- ChawlaNYabroffKRMariottoAMcNeelTSSchragDWarrenJLLimited validity of diagnosis codes in Medicare claims for identifying cancer metastases and inferring stageAnn Epidemiol201424966667225066409
- NordstromBLSimeoneJCMalleyKGValidation of claims algorithms for progression to metastatic cancer in patients with breast, non-small cell lung, and colorectal cancerFront Oncol201661826870695
- BufferyDInnovation tops current trends in the 2016 oncology drug pipelineAm Health Drug Benefits20169423323827688835
- FreemanVGRathoreSSWeinfurtKPSchulmanKASulmasyDPLying for patients: physician deception of third-party payersArch Intern Med1999159192263227010547165
- NovackDHDeteringBJArnoldRForrowLLadinskyMPezzulloJCPhysicians’ attitudes toward using deception to resolve difficult ethical problemsJAMA198926120298029852716130
- KurianAWLichtensztajnDYKeeganTHMPatterns and predictors of breast cancer chemotherapy use in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2004–2007Breast Cancer Res Treat2013137124726023139057
- BayleyKBBelnapTSavitzLMasicaALShahNFlemingNSChallenges in using electronic health record data for CER: experience of 4 learning organizations and solutions appliedMed Care201351S80S8623774512
- MallinKPalisBEWatrobaNCompleteness of American Cancer Registry treatment data: implications for quality of care researchJ Am Coll Surg2013216342843723357724
- CressRDZaslavskyAMWestDWWolfREFelterMCAyanianJZCompleteness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registriesMed Care20034191006101212972840
- DuXLKeyCRDickieLInformation on chemotherapy and hormone therapy from tumor registry had moderate agreement with chart reviewsJ Clin Epidemiol2006591536016360561
- ThiruKHasseyASullivanFSystematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary careBMJ20033267398107012750210
- ChanKSFowlesJBWeinerJPReview: electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measures: a review of the literatureMed Care Res Rev201067550352720150441
- WeiskopfNGWengCMethods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical researchJ Am Med Inform Assoc201320114415122733976
- KahnMGCallahanTJBarnardJA harmonized data quality assessment terminology and framework for the secondary use of electronic health record dataEGEMS (Wash DC)201641124427713905
- StewartSLWikeJMKatoILewisDRMichaudFA population-based study of colorectal cancer histology in the United States, 1998–2001Cancer20061075 Suppl1128114116802325