Typology of end-of-life priorities in Saudi females: averaging analysis and Q-methodology

References

• FieldMJCasselCKApproaching Death: Improving Care at the End of LifeWashington, DCNational Academy Press, Institute of Medicine1997
   Google Scholar
• The SUPPORT Principle InvestigatorsA controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (SUPPORT)JAMA199527420159115987474243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SingerPABowmanKWQuality end-of-life care: a global perspectiveBMC Palliat Care200211412139768
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RaoJKAlongiJAndersonLAJenkinsLStokesGAKaneMDevelopment of public health priorities for end-of-life initiativesAm J Prev Med200529545346016376710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalpernSDToward evidence-based end-of-life careN Engl J Med2015373212001200326465826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SahmSWillRHommelGWhat are cancer patients’ preferences about treatment at the end of life, and who should start talking about it? A comparison with healthy people and medical staffSupport Care Cancer200513420621415657689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GomesBHigginsonIJCalanzaniNPRISMA. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal and SpainAnn Oncol20122382006201522345118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HardingRSimmsVCalanzaniNPRISMA. If you had less than a year to live, would you want to know? A seven-country European population survey of public preferences for disclosure of poor prognosisPsychooncology201322102298230523508972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavesonBABauseweinCMurtaghFEPRISMA. To be involved or not to be involved: a survey of public preferences for self-involvement in decision-making involving mental capacity (competency) within EuropePalliat Med201327541842723426845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HigginsonIJGomesBCalanzaniNProject PRISMA. Priorities for treatment, care and information if faced with serious illness: a comparative population-based survey in seven European countriesPalliat Med201428210111023703237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowningJGomesBGikaaraNProject PRISMA. Public preferences and priorities for end-of-life care in Kenya: a population-based street surveyBMC Palliat Care2014131424529217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PowellRANamisangoEGikaaraNPublic priorities and preferences for end-of-life care in NamibiaJ Pain Symptom Manage201447362063023870841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TangSTLiuTWLaiMSLiuLNChenCHConcordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in TaiwanJ Pain Symptom Manage200530651051816376737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowneyLEngelbergRACurtisRLaffertyWEPatrickDLShared priorities for the end-of-life periodJ Pain Symptom Manage200937217518818722084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HammamiMMAl GaaiEHammamiSAttalaSExploring end of life priorities in Saudi males: usefulness of Q-methodologyBMC Palliat Care20151416626611147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowneyLCurtisJRLaffertyWEHertingJREngelbergRAThe quality of dying and death (QODD) questionnaire: empirical domains and theoretical perspectivesJ Pain Symptom Manage201039192219782530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeownBThomasDQ MethodologyNewbury ParkSage Publications1988
   Google Scholar
• ThomasDMWatsonRTQ-sorting and MIS research: a primerCommun Assoc Inf Syst20028141156
   Google Scholar
• SteinhauserKEClippECMcNeillyMChristakisNAMcIntyreLMTulskyJAIn search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providersAnn Intern Med20001321082583210819707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinhauserKEChristakisNAClippECPreparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providersJ Pain Symptom Manage200122372773711532586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EngelbergRAPatrickDLCurtisJRCorrespondence between patients’ preferences and surrogates’ understandings for dying and deathJ Pain Symptom Manage200530649850916376736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CurtisJRPatrickDLEngelbergRANorrisKAspCByockIA measure of the quality of dying and death: initial validation using after-death interviews with family membersJ Pain Symptom Manage2002241173112183092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatrickDLEngelbergRACurtisJREvaluating the quality of dying and deathJ Pain Symptom Manage200122371772611532585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AltmanDGBlandJMInteraction revisited: the difference between two estimatesBMJ2003326738221912543843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinhauserKEChristakisNAClippECMcNeillyMMcIntyreLTulskyJAFactors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians and other care providersJAMA2000284192476248211074777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MiccinesiGBianchiEBrunelliCBorreaniCEnd-of-life preferences in advanced cancer patients willing to discuss issues surrounding their terminal conditionEur J Cancer Care (Engl)201221562363322519892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HammamiMMAl-GaaiEAAl-JawarnehYPatients’ perceived purpose of clinical informed consent: Mill’s individual autonomy model is preferredBMC Med Ethics201415224406020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HammamiMMAl-JawarnehYHammamiMBAl QadireMInformation disclosure in clinical informed consent: “reasonable” patient’s perception of norm in high-context communication cultureBMC Med Ethics201415324406055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del PozoPRFinsJJIslam and informed consent: notes from DohaCamb Q Healthc Ethics200817327327918495067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbdulhameedHEHammamiMMMohamedEADisclosure of terminal illness to patients and families: diversity of governing codes in 14 Islamic countriesJ Med Ethics201137847247521429961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar