Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure

Collette R LessardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Matthew R HopkinsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Pages 207-212 | Published online: 28 Apr 2011

Cite this article

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

HurskainenRHoviSLGisslerMHysteroscopic tubal sterilization: A systematic review of the Essure systemFertil Steril2010941161919409549
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hastings-TolsmaMNodinePTealSBEssure: Hysteroscopic sterilizationJ Midwifery Womens Health200651651051417081943
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ConnorVFEssure: A review six years laterJ Minim Invasive Gynecol200916328229019423060
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
CooperJMCarignanCSCherDKerinJFMicroinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilizationObstet Gynecol20031021596712850608
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LevyBLevieMDChildersMEA summary of reported pregnancies after hysteroscopic sterilizationJ Minim Invasive Gynecol200714327127417478354
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PalmerSNGreenbergJATranscervical sterilization: A comparison of Essure® permanent birth control system and Adiana® permanent contraception systemRev Obstet Gynecol200922849219609402
PubMedGoogle Scholar
ShavellVIAbdallahMEDiamondMPBermanJMPlacement of a permanent birth control device at a university medical centerJ Reprod Med200954421822219438163
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PetersonHBXiaZHughesJMWilcoxLSTylorLRTrussellJThe risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: Findings from the US Collaborative Review of SterilizationAm J Obstet Gynecol19961744116111688623843
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
WesthoffCDavisATubal sterilization: Focus on the US experienceFertil Steril200073591392210785216
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Essure. [homepage on the internet] Essure manufacturer website;2009 Available from http://www.essure.com/. Accessed April 5 2011
Google Scholar
Essure. [homepage on the internet] Essure US manufacturer website;2010 Available from http://www.essuremd.com/. Accessed April 5 2011
Google Scholar
LevieMWeissGKaiserBDaifJChudnoffSGAnalysis of pain and satisfaction with office-based hysteroscopic sterilizationFertil Steril20109441189119419683232
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
NicholsMCarterJFFylstraDLChildersMA comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating roomJ Minim Invasive Gynecol200613544745016962530
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
PanelPGrosdemougeIPredictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: Prospective, multicenter study of 495 patientsFertil Steril2010931293419022435
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KerinJFMundayDNRitossaMGPesceARosenDEssure hysteroscopic sterilization: Results based on utilizing a new coil catheter delivery systemJ Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc200411338839315559354
PubMedGoogle Scholar
LevieMDChudnoffSGProspective analysis of office-based hysteroscopic sterilizationJ Minim Invasive Gynecol20061329810116527710
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SmithRDContemporary hysteroscopic methods for female sterilizationInt J Gynaecol Obstet20101081798419716128
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
LegendreGGervaiseALevaillantJMFaivreEDeffieuxXFernandezHAssessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsertFertil Steril20109472732273520451183
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
VeersemaSVleugelsMKoksCThurkowAvan der VaartHBrolmannHConfirmation of Essure placement using transvaginal ultrasoundJ Minim Invasive Gynecol1112011 [Epub ahead of print].
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
SavageUKMastersSJSmidMCHungYYJacobsonGFHysteroscopic sterilization in a large group practice: Experience and effectivenessObstet Gynecol200911461227123119935023
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ShavellVIAbdallahMEDiamondMPKmakDCBermanJMPost-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic populationJ Minim Invasive Gynecol200815443143418588851
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricans and GynaecologistsACOG Practice Bulletin No 46: Benefits and risks of sterilizationWashington, DCAmerican College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists2003 Available at: http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=10945. Accessed on February 28, 2011.
Google Scholar
ChernBSiowAInitial Asian experience in hysteroscopic sterilisation using the Essure permanent birth control deviceBJOG200511291322132716101615
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KerinJFCooperJMPriceTHysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: Results of a multicentre Phase II studyHum Reprod20031861223123012773450
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
BradleyLDComplications in hysteroscopy: Prevention, treatment and legal riskCurr Opin Obstet Gynecol200214440941512151831
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
FamuyideAOHopkinsMREl-NasharSAHysteroscopic sterilization in women with severe cardiac disease: experience at a tertiary centerMayo Clinic Proc2008834431438
Web of Science ®Google Scholar
ChudnoffSEinsteinMLevieMParacervical block efficacy in office hysteroscopic sterilization: A randomized controlled trialObstet Gynecol20101151263420027030
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
DuffySMarshFRogersonLFemale sterilisation: A cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisationBJOG2005112111522152816225573
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
KraemerDFYenP-YNicholsMAn economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligationContraception20098025426019698817
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
HopkinsMRCreedonDJWagieAEWilliamsARFamuyideAORetrospective cost analysis comparing Essure hysteroscopic sterilization and laparoscopic bilateral tubal coagulationJ Minim Invasive Gynecol20071419710217218238
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date