Advanced search
Publication Cover
Patient Preference and Adherence Volume 11, 2017 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
170
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Comparison of EQ-5D-5L health state utilities using four country-specific tariffs on a breast cancer patient sample in mainland China

Liu Liu1 School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, Jinan, China;2 Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research, NHFPC (Shandong University), Jinan, China
,
Shunping Li1 School of Health Care Management, Shandong University, Jinan, China;2 Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research, NHFPC (Shandong University), Jinan, ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Min Wang3 Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, China
&
Gang Chen4 Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Pages 1049-1056 | Published online: 23 Jun 2017

References

  • EarnshawJLewisGNICE guide to the methods of technology appraisalPharmacoEconomics200826972572718767892
  • GoldMRussellLSiegelJWeinsteinMCost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicineNew YorkOxford University Press1996
  • DrummondMSculpherMTorranceGO’BrienBStoddartGMethods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes3rd edNew YorkOxford University Press2005
  • TorranceGWMeasurement of health state utilities for economic appraisalJ Health Econ19865113010311607
  • BrazierJRatcliffeJSalomonJTsuchiyaAMeasuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic EvaluationNew YorkOxford University Press2007
  • BrooksREuroQol: the current state of playHealth Policy1996371537210158943
  • BrazierJRobertsJDeverillMThe estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36J Health Econ200221227129211939242
  • FeenyDFurlongWTorranceGWMultiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 systemMed Care200240211312811802084
  • DolanPModeling valuations for EuroQol health statesMed Care19973511109511089366889
  • KindPBrooksRRabinREQ-5D Concepts and Methods: A Developmental HistoryThe NetherlandsSpringer2005
  • ZhouTGuanHMaALiuGComparison between the EQ-5D-5l and the EQ-5D-3l for general population in ChinaChinese Health Econ20163531720
  • AgborsangayaCBLahtinenMCookeTJohnsonJAComparing the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: measurement properties and association with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in the general populationHealth Qual Life Outcomes20141211724382363
  • HerdmanMCGudexCLloydADevelopment and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)Qual Life Res201120101727173621479777
  • LuoNLiMLiuGGLloydAde CharroFHerdmanMDeveloping the Chinese version of the new 5-level EQ-5D descriptive system: the response scaling approachQual Life Res201322488589022622627
  • DevlinNShahKFengYMulhernBVan HoutBValuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England2016 Available from: https://www.ohe.org/publications/valuing-health-related-quality-life-eq-5d-5l-value-set-englandAccessed November 18, 2016
  • BadiaXRosetMHerdmanMKindPA comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health statesMed Decis Making200121171611206949
  • LuoNJohnsonJAShawJWCoonsSJA comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functionsMed Decis Making200727332132617545501
  • KimSHAhnJOckMThe EQ-5D-5L valuation study in KoreaQual Life Res20162571845185226961008
  • IkedaSShiroiwaTIgarashiADeveloping a Japanese version of the EQ-5D-5L value setJ Natl Inst Public Health20156414755
  • LuoNLiuGLiMGuanHJinXRand-HendriksenKEstimating an EQ-5D-5L value set for ChinaValue Health201720466266928408009
  • ChenWZhengRBaadePDCancer statistics in China, 2015CA Cancer J Clin201666211526808342
  • FanLStrasser-WeipplKLiJJBreast cancer in ChinaLancet Oncol2014157279289
  • FayersPMachinDQuality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-Reported OutcomesWiley, Chichester, UK2013
  • BlandJMAltmanDGStatistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurementLancet1986184769319362871239
  • ZhouZFangYZhouZAssessing income-related health inequality and horizontal inequity in ChinaSoc Indic Res20171321241256
  • WuCGongYWuJChinese version of the EQ-5D preference weights: applicability in a Chinese general populationPLoS One20161110e016433427711169
  • SakthongPCharoenvisuthiwongsRShabunthomRA comparison of EQ-5D index scores using the UK, US, and Japan preference weights in a Thai sample with type 2 diabetesHealth Qual Life Outcomes2008611918179687
  • BrazierJEComparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6DQual Life Res20051461523153216110932
  • McClureNSSayahFAXieFLuoNJohnsonJAInstrument-defined estimates of the minimally important difference for EQ-5D-5L index scoresValue Health201720464465028408007
  • GalanteJAugustovskiFColantonioLEstimation and comparison of EQ-5D health states’ utility weights for pneumococcal and human papillomavirus diseases in Argentina, Chile, and the United KingdomValue Health2011145 Suppl 1S60S6421839901
  • BaileyHKindPPreliminary findings of an investigation into the relationship between national culture and EQ-5D value setsQual Life Res20101981145115420496167
  • KniesSEversSMCandelMJSeverensJLAmentAJUtilities of the EQ-5D: transferable or not?Pharmacoeconomics200927976777919757870
  • WuYQLiuKTangXEmpirical research of measuring elderly health utility in the outskirts of Beijing by using European quality of life 5-dimensionsBeijing Da Xue Xue Bao2012443397 Chinese22692310

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.