Therapy preferences of patients with lung and colon cancer: a discrete choice experiment

References

• FerlayJSoerjomataramIDikshitRCancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012Int J Cancer20151365E359E38625220842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AllemaniCWeirHKCarreiraHCONCORD Working GroupGlobal surveillance of cancer survival 1995–2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2)Lancet20153859972977101025467588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationGlobal Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013–2020 Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/94384/1/9789241506236_eng.pdf?ua=1Accessed May 26, 2016
   Google Scholar
• PieterseAHBaas-ThijssenMCMMarijnenCAMStiggelboutAMClinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative explorationBr J Cancer200899687588218781148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PieterseAHStiggelboutAMBaas-ThijssenMCvan de VeldeCJMarijnenCABenefit from preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment: disease-free patients’ and oncologists’ preferencesBr J Cancer200797671772417848910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisonJDSolomonMJYoungJMPatient and physician preferences for surgical and adjuvant treatment options for rectal cancerArch Surg2008143438939418427027
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChuDTKimSWKuoHPPatient attitudes towards chemotherapy as assessed by patient versus physician: a prospective observational study in advanced non-small cell lung cancerLung Cancer200756343344317346847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SolomonMJPagerCKKeshavaAWhat do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancerDis Colon Rectum200346101351135714530674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MühlbacherACNüblingMAnalysis of physicians’ perspectives versus patients’ preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myelomaEur J Health Econo2011123193203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DammKVogelAPrenzlerAPreferences of colorectal cancer patients for treatment and decision-making: a systematic literature reviewEur J Cancer Care2014236762772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmidtKDammKPrenzlerAGolponHWelteTPreferences of lung cancer patients for treatment and decision-making: a systematic literature reviewEur J Cancer Care2015254580591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChuePThe relationship between patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in schizophreniaJ Psychopharmacol200620Suppl 6385617046986
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CasadoJLMarínARomeroVThe influence of patient beliefs and treatment satisfaction on the discontinuation of current first-line antiretroviral regimensHIV Med2016171465526149493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HannDAllenSCiambroneDShahAUse of complementary therapies during chemotherapy: influence of patients’ satisfaction with treatment decision making and the treating oncologistIntegr Cancer Ther20065322423116880427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of HealthThe act on the reform of the market for medicinal products (Gesetz zur Neuordnung des Arzneimittelmarktes – AMNOG)2011 Available from: https://www.bgbl.de/xaver/bgbl/start.xav?startbk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&bk=Bundesanzeiger_BGBl&start=//*[@attr_id=%27bgbl110s2262.pdf%27]Accessed August 6, 2017
   Google Scholar
• StaeckFLebensqualitätForscher und GBA wollen Methoden-Sicherheit Available from: http://www.aerztezeitung.de/politik_gesellschaft/arzneimittelpolitik/nutzenbewertung/article/925499/lebensqualitaet-forscher-gba-wollen-methoden-sicherheit.htmlAccessed July 05, 2017
   Google Scholar
• LancsarELouviereJConducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guidePharmaco Economics2008268661677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MühlbacherAJohnsonFRChoice experiments to quantify preferences for health and healthcare: state of the practiceAppl Health Econ Health Policy201614325326626992386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AumannIKreisKDammKGolponHWelteTGraf von der SchulenburgJMTreatment-related experiences and preferences of patients with lung cancer: a qualitative analysisHealth Expect20151961226123626468689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AuspurgKLiebeUChoice-Experimente und die Messung von Han-dlungsentscheidungen in der Soziologie [Choice-experiments and the measurement of behavioral decisions in sociology]Köln Z Soziol2011632301314 German
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuhfeldWFMarketing research methods in SASExperimental design, choice, conjoint, and graphical techniques Available from: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010.pdfAccessed March 31, 2014
   Google Scholar
• AaronsonNKAhmedzaiSBergmanBThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncologyJ Natl Cancer Inst19938553653768433390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaldmannASchubertDKatalinicAJandaMNormative data of the EORTC QLQ-C30 for the German Population: a population-based surveyPLoS One201389e7414924058523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bekker-GrobEstherWDonkersBJonkerMFStolkEASample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guidePatient20158537338425726010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual Available from: http://www.eortc.be/qol/files/SCManualQLQ-C30.pdfAccessed January 11, 2017
   Google Scholar
• HauberABGonzalezJMGroothuis-OudshoornCGMStatistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good research practices task forceValue Health201619430031527325321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullochCELinHSlateEHTurnbullBWDiscovering sub-population structure with latent class mixed modelsStat Med200221341742911813228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten, Robert Koch InstitutDarmkrebs [Colon and rectum] Available from: http://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/EN/Content/Publications/Cancer_in_Germany/cancer_chapters_2011_2012/cancer_c18-21.pdf?__blob=publicationFileAccessed July 26, 2016 German
   Google Scholar
• Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten, Robert Koch InstitutLungenkrebs [Lung] Available from: http://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/EN/Content/Publications/Cancer_in_Germany/cancer_chapters_2011_2012/cancer_c33-34.pdf?__blob=publicationFileAccessed July 26, 2016 German
   Google Scholar
• MühlbacherACBethgeSPatients’ preferences: a discrete-choice experiment for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancerEur J Health Econ201516665767025135768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BridgesJFMohamedAFFinnernHWWoehlAHauberABPatients’ preferences for treatment outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a conjoint analysisLung Cancer201277122423122369719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoolMvan der SijpJoostRMKroepJRImportance of patient reported outcome measures versus clinical outcomes for breast cancer patients evaluation on quality of careBreast201627626827026219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaryionavaKSklenarovaHHeußnerPCancer patients’ preferences for quantity or quality of life: German Translation and validation of the quality and quantity questionnaireOncol Res Treat201437947247825231687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrightAAMackJWKritekPAInfluence of patients’ preferences and treatment site on cancer patients’ end-of-life careCancer2010116194656466320572030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StiggelboutAMde HaesJCKiebertGMKievitJLeerJWTradeoffs between quality and quantity of life: development of the QQ Questionnaire for Cancer Patient AttitudesMed Decis Making19961621841928778537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoeckenjanGSitterHThomasMPrevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of lung cancer: interdisciplinary guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer SocietyPneumologie201064Suppl 2e1e16420217630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• German Guideline Program in OncologyGerman Cancer Society, German Cancer AidEvidenced-Based Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Available from http://www.awmf.org/filead-min/user_upload/Leitlinien/021_D_Ges_fuer_Verdauungs-_und_Stoffwechselkrankheiten/021-007_S3_Colorectal_Cancer_2015_03-extended.pdfAccessed August 8, 2017
   Google Scholar
• PolanskiJJankowska-PolanskaBRosinczukJChabowskiMSzymanska-ChabowskaAQuality of life of patients with lung cancerOnco Targets Ther201691023102827013895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdamsSVCeballosRNewcombPAQuality of life and mortality of long-term colorectal cancer survivors in the seattle colorectal cancer family registryPLoS One2016116e015653427253385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarventanoSForjazMGrossoGHealth related quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: state of the artBMC Surgery201313Suppl 2S1524267735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoastJAl-JanabiHSuttonEJUsing qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendationsHealth Econ201221673074121557381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar