Comparison of three types of central venous catheters in patients with malignant tumor receiving chemotherapy

References

• PatelGSJainKKumarRComparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignanciesSupport Care Cancer201422112112824005884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoadyKAliMSidloffDKenninghamRRAhmedSA comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumoursJ Vasc Access2015161384125198809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LovedayHPWilsonJAPrattRJUK Department of Healthepic3: national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in EnglandJ Hosp Infect201486suppl 1S1S7024330862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillSTrapezius placement of implanted ports: understanding the procedureBr J Nurs201625suppl 2S9S15
   Google Scholar
• LiuYGaoYWeiLChenWMaXSongLPeripherally inserted central catheter thrombosis incidence and risk factors in cancer patients: a double-center prospective investigationTher Clin Risk Manag20151115316025673995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GroegerJSLucasABThalerHTInfectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancerAnn Intern Med199311912116811748239247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappers-KlunneMCDegenerJEStijnenTAbelsJComplications from long-term indwelling central venous catheters in hematologic patients with special reference to infectionCancer1989648174717522790689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BabuKGSuresh BabuMCLokanathaDBhatGROutcomes, cost comparison, and patient satisfaction during long-term central venous access in cancer patients: experience from a Tertiary Care Cancer Institute in South IndiaIndian J Med Paediatr Oncol201637423223828144088
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WorthLJSeymourJFSlavinMAInfective and thrombotic complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancy: prospective evaluation of nontunneled devicesSupport Care Cancer200917781181819096883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’GradyNPAlexanderMBurnsLAGuidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infectionsAm J Infect Control2011394 suppl 1S1S3421511081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChopraVO’HoroJCRogersMAMakiDGSafdarNThe risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysisInfect Control Hosp Epidemiol201334990891823917904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZaghalAKhalifeMMukherjiDUpdate on totally implantable venous access devicesSurg Oncol201221320721522425356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiYCaiYGanXApplication and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patientsWorld J Surg Oncol201614125127664131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolleePJonesMStackelrothJCatheter-associated bloodstream infection incidence and risk factors in adults with cancer: a prospective cohort studyJ Hosp Infect2011781263021459476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VepsalainenKLassilaRArolaMComplications associated with central venous access device in children with haemophilia: a nationwide multicentre study in FinlandHaemophilia201521674775325832453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiJFanY-YXinM-ZA randomised, controlled trial comparing the long-term effects of peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy patients using B-mode ultrasound with modified Seldinger technique versus blind punctureEur J Oncol Nurs20141819410324018351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoriYNagayamaSKawamuraJA retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single instituteInt J Clin Oncol201621347448226507141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AziretMIrkorucuOGoklerCPerformance of venous port catheter insertion by a general surgeon: a prospective studyInt Surg2015100582783526011202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiffiROrsiFPozziSBest choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trialAnn Oncol200920593594019179550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillSTotally implanted ports: the trapezius approach in practiceBr J Nurs20152419S22S26
   Google Scholar
• CotogniPPittirutiMBarberoCMongeTPalmoABoggio BertinetDCatheter-related complications in cancer patients on home parenteral nutrition: a prospective study of over 51,000 catheter daysJPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr201337337538323002096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SutherlandDEWeitzICLiebmanHAThromboembolic complications of cancer: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatmentAm J Hematol2003721435212508268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VesciaSBaumgartnerAKJacobsVRManagement of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidenceAnn Oncol200819191517846025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuSFChenJHShangWMChouSSPrevention and nursing care of central line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patientsHu Li Za Zhi [J Nurs]2012594511 Chinese
   Google Scholar
• MartellaFSalutariVMarchettiCA retrospective analysis of trabectedin infusion by peripherally inserted central venous cathetersAnticancer Drugs201526999099426241804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarloJTLamontJPMcCartyTMLivingstonSKuhnJAA prospective randomized trial demonstrating valved implantable ports have fewer complications and lower overall cost than nonvalved implantable portsAm J Surg2004188672272715619490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar