The problem with health measurement

References

• DarziAHigh Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final ReportLondon, UKDepartment of Health2008
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug AdministrationPatient reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labelling claims Available from: www.fda.gov/cber/gdlns/prolbl.pdf. Accessed May 17, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Drug AdministrationQualification process for drug development tools Available from: http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm. Accessed May 17, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Department of HealthEquity and Excellence: Liberating the NHSLondon, UKHer Majesty’s Stationery Office2010
   Google Scholar
• MAPI Trust Available from: http://www.mapi-trust.org/about-the-trust. Accessed May 17, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• HobartJLampingDThompsonAEvaluating neurological outcome measures: The bare essentialsJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1996601271308708638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HobartJFreemanJThompsonAKurtzke scales revisited: The application of psychometric methods to clinical intuitionBrain20001231027104010775547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanoSKlassenAPusicAThe science behind quality-of-life measurement: A primer for plastic surgeonsPlast Reconstr Surg200912398e106e19116542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanoSKlassenAScottAThomaAFeenyDPusicAHealth outcome and economic measurement in breast cancer surgery: Challenges and opportunitiesExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res20101058359420950073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanoSHobartJHartPKoliparaLSchapiraACooperJThe International Co-operative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): An appropriate rating scale for Friedreich’s ataxiaMov Disord2005201585159116114019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanoSPosnerHMolineMThe ADAS-cog in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials: Psychometric evaluation of the sum and its partsJ Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2010811363136820881017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HobartJLampingDFitzpatrickRRiaziAThompsonAThe Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measureBrain200112496297311335698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanoSBrowneJLampingDRobertsAMcGroutherDBlackNThe Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Head/Neck (POS-Head/Neck): A new patient-based outcome measureJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg200659657316482791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HobartJCanoSImproving the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in MS: The role of new psychometric methodsHealth Technol Assess2009131200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StreinerDNormanGHealth Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use4th edOxford, UKOxford University Press2008
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes TrustAssessing health status and quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteriaQual Life Res20021119320512074258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MokkinkLTerweeCPatrickDThe COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi studyQual Life Res20101953954920169472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CanoSBrowneJLampingDPatient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: Current approaches and future directionsBr J Plast Surg20045711114672672
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CanoSHobartJLinacreJPatient-based outcomes of cervical dystonia: A review of rating scalesMov Disord2004191054105915372595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PusicALiuJChenCA systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and neck cancer surgeryOtolaryngol Head Neck Surg200713652553517418246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KosowskiTMcCarthyCReaveyPA systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after facial cosmetic surgery and/or nonsurgical facial rejuvenationPlast Reconstr Surg20091231819182719483584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenCCanoSKlassenAMeasuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measuresBreast J20101658759721070435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HobartJCanoSZajicekJThompsonARating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: Problems, solutions, and recommendationsLancet Neurol200761094110518031706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeinsteinAClinimetricsNew Haven, CTYale University Press1987
   Google Scholar
• StewartAWareJMeasuring Functioning and Well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study ApproachDurham, NCDuke University Press1992
   Google Scholar
• NunnallyJPsychometric Theory2nd edNew York, NYMcGraw-Hill1978
   Google Scholar
• ThurstoneLA method for scaling psychological and educational testsJ Educ Psychol192516433451
   Google Scholar
• GuttmanLA basis for analysing test-retest reliabilityPsychometrika19451025528221007983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GulliksenHTheory of Mental TestsNew York, NYWiley1950
   Google Scholar
• TorgersonWTheory and Methods of ScalingNew York, NYJohn Wiley and Sons1958
   Google Scholar
• EdwardsATechniques of Attitude Scale ConstructionNew York, NYAppleton-Century-Crofts1957
   Google Scholar
• LikertRA technique for the measurement of attitudesArch Psychol1932140555
   Google Scholar
• LikertRRoslowSMurphyGA simple and reliable method of scoring the Thurstone attitude scalesJ Soc Psychol19345228238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WareJSnowKKosinskiMGandekBSF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation GuideBoston, MANimrod Press1993
   Google Scholar
• WareJKosinskiMKellerSSF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s ManualBoston, MAThe Health Institute, New England Medical Center1994
   Google Scholar
• GoldbergDManual of the General Health QuestionnaireWindsor, UKNFER-Nelson1978
   Google Scholar
• ZigmondASnaithRThe Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleActa Psychiatr Scand1983673613706880820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaskaSWeinsteinJHistorical perspective. Ernest Amory Codman, 1869–1940. A pioneer of evidence-based medicine: The end result ideaSpine1998236296339530796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeuhauserDErnest Amory Codman, M.D., and end results of medical careInt J Technol Assess Health Care199063073252203705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VisickAA study of the failures after gastectomyAnn R Coll Surg Engl1948326628418112082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KarnofskyDAbelmannWCraverLBurchenalJThe use of nitrogen mustards in the treatment of carcinomaCancer19481634656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FraserSQuality-of-life measurement in surgical practiceBr J Surg1993801631698443640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KatzSDownsTCashHGrotzRProgress in development of the index of ADLGerontologist19761020305420677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HerndonRHandbook of Neurologic Rating ScalesNew York, NYDemos Medical Publishing2006
   Google Scholar
• World Health OrganisationConstitution of the World Health OrganisationGeneva, SwitzerlandWorld Health Organisation1948
   Google Scholar
• RobinsonRThe policy contextBr Med J19933079949968241915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuntSMThe problem of quality of lifeQual Life Res199762052129226977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BergnerMBobbittRPollardWMartinDGilsonBThe Sickness Impact Profile: Validation of a health status measureMed Care1976145767950811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuntSMcEwenJMcKennaSMeasuring Health StatusLondon, UKCroom Helm1985
   Google Scholar
• WareJSherbourneDThe MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selectionMed Care1992304734831593914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AaronsonNAhmedzaiSBergmanBThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncologyJ Natl Cancer Inst1993853653768433390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DawsonJFitzpatrickRMurrayDCarrAComparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgeryQual Health Care19965818810158596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’BoyleCMcGeeHHickeyAJoyceCBrowneJO’MalleyKThe Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life (SEIQoL): Administration ManualDublin, IrelandRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland1993
   Google Scholar
• RevickiDCellaDHealth status assessment for the twenty-first century: Item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testingQual Life Res199765956009330558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FriesJFCellaDRoseMKrishnanEBruceBProgress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testingJ Rheumatol2009362061206619738214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarciaSCellaDClauserSBStandardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiativeJ Clin Oncol2007255106511217991929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrowneJMcGeeHO’BoyleCConceptual approaches to the assessment of quality of lifePsychol Health199712737751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BowlingAMeasuring Health: A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales3rd edMilton Keynes, UKOpen University Press2005
   Google Scholar
• BergnerMHealth status measures: An overview and guide for selectionAnnu Rev Public Health198781912103555521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatrickDDeyoRGeneric and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of lifeMed Care1989273 SupplS217S2322646490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FletcherAGoreSJonesDFitzpatrickRSpiegelhalterDCoxDQuality of life measures in health care. II: Design, analysis, and interpretationBr Med J1992305114511481463954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GoldbergDHillierVA scaled version of the General Health QuestionnairePsychol Med19799139145424481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RutaDGarrattALengMRussellIMacDonaldLA new approach to measurement of quality of life: The patient-generated indexMed Care199432110911267967852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzpatrickRDaveyCBuxtonMJJonesDREvaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trialsHealth Technol Assess1998217410103353
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChoppinBAn item bank using sample free calibrationNature19682198708725673356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinacreJComputer-adaptive testing: A methodology whose time has comeChaeSKangUJeonELinacreJDevelopment of Computerised Middle School Achievement TestsSeoul, KoreaKomesa Press2000
   Google Scholar
• WareJBjornerJKosinskiMPractical implications of item response theory and computer adaptive testing. A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scalesMed Care2000387382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WareJBrookRDavies-AveryAConceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study: Volume I, Model of Health and MethodologySanta Monica, CAThe Rand Corporation1980
   Google Scholar
• McDowellINewellCMeasuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires1st edOxford, UKOxford University Press1987
   Google Scholar
• StreinerDNormanGHealth Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use1st edOxford, UKOxford University Press1989
   Google Scholar
• GuilfordJPsychometric Methods2nd edNew York, NYMcGraw-Hill1954
   Google Scholar
• NunnallyJTests and Measurements: Assessment and PredictionNew York, NYMcGraw-Hill1959
   Google Scholar
• ThurstoneLFechner’s law and the method of equal-apprearing intervalsJ Exp Psychol192912214214
   Google Scholar
• NunnallyJPsychometric Theory1st edNew York, NYMcGraw-Hill1967
   Google Scholar
• BrookRWareJDavies-AveryAConceptualization and Measurement of Health for Adults in the Health Insurance Study: Volume VIII, OverviewSanta Monica, CAThe Rand Corporation1979
   Google Scholar
• StewartAGreenfieldSHaysRFunctional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes StudyJ Am Med Assoc1989262907913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpearmanCThe proof and measurement of association between two thingsAm J Psychol19041572101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NovickMThe axioms and principal results of classical test theoryJ Math Psychol19663118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StevensSOn the theory of scales of measurementScience1946103677680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MichellJMeasurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigmsPsychol Bull1986100398407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaschGProbabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment TestsCopenhagen, DenmarkDanish Institute for Education Research1960
   Google Scholar
• AndrichDControversy and the Rasch model: A characteristic of incompatible paradigmsMed Care200442I7I1614707751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrightBStoneMBest Test Design: Rasch MeasurementChicago, ILMESA College Press1979
   Google Scholar
• AndrichDRasch Models for MeasurementBeverley Hills, CASage Publications1988
   Google Scholar
• WrightBLinacreJObservations are always ordinal: Measurements, however must be intervalArch Phys Med Rehabil1989708578602818162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorneyCHaleySWareJEvaluation of the MOS SF-36 Physical Functioning Scale (PF-10): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methodsJ Clin Epidemiol1997504514619179104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrietoLAlonsoJLamarcaRClassical test theory versus Rasch analysis for quality of life questionnaire reductionHealth Qual Life Outcomes200312712952544
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EmbretsonSHershbergerSThe New Rules of MeasurementMahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates1999
   Google Scholar
• McHorneyCTarlovAIndividual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequateQual Life Res199542933077550178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhitakerJMcFarlandHRudgePReingoldSOutcomes assessment in multiple sclerosis trials: A critical analysisMult Scler1995137479345468
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PlatzTEickhofCNuyensGVuadensPClinical scales for the assessment of spasticity, associated phenomena, and function: A systematic review of the literatureDisabil Rehabil20052771815799141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WrightBMastersGRating Scale Analysis: Rasch MeasurementChicago, ILMESA College Press1982
   Google Scholar
• WrightBSolving measurement problems with the Rasch modelJ Educ Meas19771497116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LordFApplications of Item Response Theory to Practical TestingMahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum Associates1908
   Google Scholar
• HambletonRFundamentals of Item Response TheoryLondon, UKSage Publications1991
   Google Scholar
• NorquistJFitzpatrickRDawsonJJenkinsonCComparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in healthMed Care200442I25I3614707753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LordFNovickMStatistical Theories of Mental Test ScoresReading, MAAddison-Wesley1968
   Google Scholar
• MassofRThe measurement of vision disabilityOptom Vis Sci20027951655212199545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CookKMonahanPMcHorneyCDelicate balance between theory and practiceMed Care20034157157412719678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FisherWThe Rasch debate: Validity and revolution in education measurementWilsonMObjective Measurement: Theory into PracticeNorwood, NJAblex1992
   Google Scholar
• GoldsteinHConsequences of using the Rasch model for educational assessmentBr Educ Res J19795211220
   Google Scholar
• WrightBMisunderstanding the Rasch modelJ Educ Meas197714219225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DivgiDDoes the Rasch model really work for multiple choice items? Not if you look closelyJ Educ Meas198623283298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoldsteinHWoodRFive decades of item response modellingBr J Math Stat Psychol198942139167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StennerASmithMTesting construct theoriesPercept Mot Skills198255415426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NichollLHobartJCrampALowe-StrongAMeasuring quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Not as simple as it soundsMult Scler20051170871216320732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndrichDA framework relating outcomes based education and the taxonomy of educational objectivesStud Educ Eval2002283559
   Google Scholar
• AndrichDImplication and applications of modern test theory in the context of outcomes based educationStud Educ Eval200228103121
   Google Scholar
• HobartJRiaziAThompsonAGetting the measure of spasticity in multiple sclerosis: The Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS-88)Brain200612922423416280352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StreinerDNormanGHealth Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use2nd edOxford, UKOxford University Press1995
   Google Scholar
• NunnallyJIntroduction to Psychological MeasurementNew York, NYMcGraw-Hill1970
   Google Scholar
• MaurischatCEhlebracht-KonigIKuhnABullingerMFactorial validity and norm data comparison of the Short Form 12 in patients with inflammatory-rheumatic diseaseRheumatol Int20062661462116179999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BohrnstedtGMeasurementRossiPWrightJAndersonAHandbook of Survey ResearchNew York, NYAcademic Press1983
   Google Scholar
• CronbachLMeehlPConstruct validity in psychological testsPsychol Bull19555228130213245896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CampbellDTFiskeDWConvergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrixPsychol Bull1959568110513634291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KerlingerFNFoundations of Behavioural Research2nd edNew York, NYHolt, Rinehart and Winston1973
   Google Scholar
• StennerASmithMBurdickDTowards a theory of construct definitionJ Educ Meas198320305316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RevickiDFDA draft guidance and health-outcomes researchLancet200736954054217307086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StennerABurdickHSandfordEBurdickDHow accurate are Lexile text measuresJ Appl Meas2006730732216807496
   PubMedGoogle Scholar