The impact of sample type and procedural attributes on relative acceptability of different colorectal cancer screening regimens

References

• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareCancer in AustraliaCanberraAIHW2017
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareNational Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Monitoring Report 2017CanberraAIHW2017
   Google Scholar
• BensonVSPatnickJDaviesAKNadelMRSmithRAAtkinWSColorectal cancer screening: A comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countriesInt J Cancer200812261357136718033685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BensonVSAtkinWSGreenJToward standardizing and reporting colorectal cancer screening indicators on an international level: The International Colorectal Cancer Screening NetworkInt J Cancer2012130122961297321792895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchreudersEHRucoARabeneckLColorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmesGut201564101637164926041752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareAnalysis of Bowel Cancer Outcomes for the National Bowel Cancer Screening ProgramCanberraAIHW2014
   Google Scholar
• MandelJSChurchTRBondJHThe effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancerN Engl J Med2000343221603160711096167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VenturaLMantelliniPGrazziniGThe impact of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing on colorectal cancer incidenceDig Liver Dis2014461828624011791
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HewitsonPGlasziouPWatsonETowlerBIrwigLCochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an updateAm J Gastroenterol200810361541154918479499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarborgKHolmeØLøbergMKalagerMAdamiHOBretthauerMCurrent status of screening for colorectal cancerAnn Oncol20132481963197223619033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColeSRTuckerGROsborneJMShift to earlier stage at diagnosis as a consequence of the National Bowel Cancer Screening ProgramMed J Aust2013198632733023545032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZajacITFlightITurnbullDYoungGColeSWilsonCSelf-reported bowel screening rates in older Australians and the implications for public health screening programsAustralas Med J20136841141724039635
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MarshallDAJohnsonFRPhillipsKAMarshallJKThabaneLKulinNAMeasuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format surveyValue Health200710541543017888107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MansfieldCTangkaFKEkwuemeDUStated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990–2013Prev Chronic Dis201613E2726916898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van DamLHolLde Bekker-GrobEWSteyerbergEWhat determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experimentEur J Cancer201046115015919683432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolLde JongeVvan LeerdamMEScreening for colorectal cancer: comparison of perceived test burden of guaiac-based faecal occult blood test, faecal immunochemical test and flexible sigmoidoscopyEur J Cancer201046112059206620621736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColeSRZajacIGregoryTPsychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South AustraliaInt J Behav Med201118430230920496170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChappleAZieblandSHewitsonPMcphersonAWhat affects the uptake of screening for bowel cancer using a faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a qualitative studySoc Sci Med200866122425243518358581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KronborgORegulaJPopulation screening for colorectal cancer: advantages and drawbacksDig Dis200725327027317827954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FábryováHCelecPOn the origin and diagnostic use of salivary RNAOral Dis201420214615223517132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpielmannNWongDTSaliva: diagnostics and therapeutic perspectivesOral Dis201117434535421122035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GanepolaGANizinJRutledgeJRChangDHUse of blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis and surveillance of colorectal cancerWorld J Gastrointest Oncol201464839724734154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YörükerEEHoldenriederSGezerUBlood-based biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancerClin Chim Acta2016455263226797671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeichmanKABlood-based testing for colorectal cancer screeningMol Diagn Ther201418212713524307563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenningTMDellaertBGDirksenCDSeverensJLPreferences for potential innovations in non-invasive colorectal cancer screening: A labeled discrete choice experiment for a Dutch screening campaignActa Oncol201453789890824456499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OsborneJMWilsonCMooreVGregoryTFlightIYoungGPSample preference for colorectal cancer screening tests: Blood or stool?Open J Prev Med201223326331
   Google Scholar
• NayaradouMBerchiCDejardinOLaunoyGEliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organizationMed Decis Making201030222423319692710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZajacITDuncanATurnbullDWilsonCFlightIBlood-based screening for bowel cancer may not resolve suboptimal screening participation in AustraliaAust N Z J Public Health201640433734127197629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KokaSBeebeTJMerrySPThe preferences of adult outpatients in medical or dental care settings for giving saliva, urine or blood for clinical testingJ Am Dent Assoc2008139673574018519997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DhimaMSalinasTJWermersRAWeaverALKokaSPreference changes of adult outpatients for giving saliva, urine and blood for clinical testing after actual sample collectionJ Prosthodont Res2013571515623376012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VineyRLancsarELouviereJDiscrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcareExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res20022431932619807438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WortleySWongGKieuAHowardKAssessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experimentsPatient20147327128224652475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PignoneMPBrennerATHawleySConjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screeningJ Gen Intern Med2012271455021870192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalkeldGSolomonMShortLRyanMWardJEEvidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screeningAust N Z J Public Health200327444945514705310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PignoneMPCrutchfieldTMBrownPMUsing a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North CarolinaBMC Health Serv Res20141461125433801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of StatisticsCensus of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2011CanberraABS2013
   Google Scholar
• LeviZRozenPHazaziRA quantitative immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasiaAnn Intern Med2007146424425517310048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaneJMChowEYoungGPInterval fecal immunochemical testing in a colonoscopic surveillance program speeds detection of colorectal neoplasiaGastroenterology201013961918192620723544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbeyasekeraSAnalysis Approaches in Participatory Work Involving Ranks or ScoresReading, UKUniversity of Reading, Natural Resources Institute, UK2001
   Google Scholar
• StreetDBurgessLThe Construction of Optimal Stated Choice Experiments: Theory and MethodsHoboken, NJWiley2007
   Google Scholar
• CohenJStatistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences2nd edHillsdale, NJ, USALawrence Erlbaum Associates1988
   Google Scholar
• TavakolMDennickRMaking sense of Cronbach’s alphaInt J Med Educ20112535528029643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monte Carlo PCA for Parallel Analysis [computer program]State College, PA, USAPsych Associates2000
   Google Scholar
• RyanMGerardKAmaya-AmayaMBatemanIUsing Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health CareBatemanIDordrecht, The NetherlandsSpringer2007
   Google Scholar
• BechMGyrd-HansenDEffects coding in discrete choice experimentsHealth Econ200514101079108315852455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoleARA comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measuresHealth Econ200716882784017238222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshallDAJohnsonFRKulinNAHow do physician assessments of patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests differ from actual preferences? A comparison in Canada and the United States using a stated-choice surveyHealth Econ200918121420143919191268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SymondsELPedersenSKBakerRTA blood test for methy-BCAT1 and IKZF1 vs. a fecal immunochemical test for detection of colorectal neoplasiaClin Transl Gastroenterol201671e13726765125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SazanovAKiselyovaEZakharenkoARomanovMZarayskyMPlasma and saliva miR-21 expression in colorectal cancer patientsHum Genet201758231237
   Google Scholar
• WorthleyDLColeSREstermanAScreening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test: why people choose to refuseIntern Med J200636960761016911554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareNational Bowel Cancer Screening Program: Monitoring Report 2013–14CanberraAIHW; 2015
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareNational Bowel Cancer Screening Program Monitoring Report: 2012–2013CanberraAIHW2014
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and WelfareNational Bowel Cancer Screening Program Monitoring Report: Phase 2, July 2008–June 2011CanberraAIHW2012
   Google Scholar
• OsterCMcguinessCDuncanATurnbullDMasculinity and men’s participation in colorectal cancer screeningPsychol Men Masc2015163254263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RitvoPMyersREPaszatLSerenityMPerezDFRabeneckLGender differences in attitudes impeding colorectal cancer screeningBMC Public Health201313150023706029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuncanAZajacIFlightIStewartBJWilsonCTurnbullDComparison of mailed invitation strategies to improve fecal occult blood test participation in men: protocol for a randomized controlled trialTrials20131423923902589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZajacITDuncanACFlightITheory-based modifications of an advanced notification letter improves screening for bowel cancer in men: A randomised controlled trialSoc Sci Med20161651927485727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LawrenceHPSalivary markers of systemic disease: noninvasive diagnosis of disease and monitoring of general healthJ Can Dent Assoc200268317017411911813
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MitchellSMRossJPDrewHRA panel of genes methylated with high frequency in colorectal cancerBMC Cancer2014145424485021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PedersenSKBakerRTMcevoyAA two-gene blood test for methylated DNA sensitive for colorectal cancerPLoS One2015104e012504125928810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada-CCAC [webpage on the Internet]Screening and Diagnostics: A Guide to Screening Tests: Colorectal Cancer Screening2017 Available from: http://www.colorectal-cancer.ca/en/screening/screening-tests/Accessed November 3, 2017
   Google Scholar
• BasakSSrivatsanESalivary biomarkers in early diagnosis and monitoring of cancerBarhDCarpiAVermaMGunduzMCancer Biomarkers: Minimal and Noninvasive Early Diagnosis and PrognosisBoca RatonCRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group2014159198
   Google Scholar
• SymondsELPedersenSColeSRImproving participation in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial of sequential offers of faecal then blood based non-invasive testsAsian Pac J Cancer Prev201516188455846026745101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar