“I don’t know exactly what you’re referring to”: the challenge of values elicitation in decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

References

• VolkRJLlewellyn-ThomasHStaceyDElwynGTen years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aidsBMC Med Inform Decis Mak201313Suppl 2S1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FagerlinAPignoneMAbhyankarPClarifying values: an updated reviewBMC Med Inform Decis Mak201313Suppl 2S8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-ThomasHACrumpRTDecision support for patients: values clarification and preference elicitationMed Care Res Rev2013701 Suppl50S79S23124615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FeatherNTValues, valences, expectations, and actionsJ Soc Issues1992482109124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReynaVFNelsonWLHanPKPignoneMPDecision making and cancerAm Psychol201570210511825730718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MunroSStaceyDLewisKBBansbackNChoosing treatment and screening options congruent with values: do decision aids help? Sub-analysis of a systematic reviewPatient Educ Couns201699449150026549169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StaceyDLégaréFColNFDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsCochrane Database Syst Rev20141CD001431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman-StewartDTongCSiemensRThe impact of explicit values clarification exercises in a patient decision aid emerges after the decision is actually made: evidence from a randomized controlled trialMed Decis Making201232461662622287534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StaceyDBennettCLBarryMJDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsCochrane Database Syst Rev201110CD001431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WittemanHOChipenda DansokhoSExeNDupuisAProvencherTZikmund-FisherBJRisk communication, values clarification, and vaccination decisionsRisk Anal201535101801181925996456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SepuchaKRBorkhoffCMLallyJEstablishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instrumentsBMC Med Inform Decis Mak201313Suppl 2S1224625035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WittemanHOSchererLDGavaruzziTDesign features of explicit values clarification methods: a systematic reviewMed Decis Making201636445347126826032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheridanSLGriffithJMBehrendLGizliceZCaiJPignoneMPEffect of adding a values clarification exercise to a decision aid on heart disease prevention: a randomized trialMed Decis Making2010304E28E3920484089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinnKOzanneESepuchaKMeasuring patient-centered care: an updated systematic review of how studies define and report concordance between patients’ preferences and medical treatmentsPatient Educ Couns201598781182125846191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrollSLMcgillionMStaceyDDevelopment and feasibility testing of decision support for patients who are candidates for a prophylactic implantable defibrillator: a study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trialTrials20131434624148851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimHSefcikJSBradwayCCharacteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic reviewRes Nurs Health2017401234227686751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColorafiKJEvansBQualitative descriptive methods in health science researchHERD2016941625
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MakoulGClaymanMLAn integrative model of shared decision making in medical encountersPatient Educ Couns200660330131216051459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrollSLStaceyDMcGillionMEvaluating the feasibility of conducting a trial using a patient decision aid in implantable cardio-verter defibrillator candidates: a randomized controlled feasibility trialPilot Feasibility Stud201734929201388
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ElwynGO’ConnorAMBennettCAssessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi)PLoS One200943e470519259269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElwynGO’ConnorAStaceyDDeveloping a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus processBMJ2006333756541716908462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’ConnorAMTugwellPWellsGAA decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluationPatient Educ Couns19983332672799731164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrollSLMcGillionMMcGrathCApplication of a delphi method to develop a patient decision aid for implantable cardioverter defibrillator candidatesCirc Qual Care Outcomes Res20136A117
   Google Scholar
• EloSKyngäsHThe qualitative content analysis processJ Adv Nurs200862110711518352969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GraneheimUHLundmanBQualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthinessNurse Educ Today200424210511214769454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LégaréFKearingSClayKAre you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening testCan Fam Physician2010568e308e31420705870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GeertzCThe Interpretation of CulturesUSABasic Books1973
   Google Scholar
• LeeYKLowWYNgCJExploring patient values in medical decision making: a qualitative studyPLoS One2013811e8005124282518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArmstrongMJMullinsCDValue assessment at the point of care: incorporating patient values throughout care delivery and a draft taxonomy of patient valuesValue Health201720229229528237212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenARJenkinsAMasoudiFADecision-making experiences of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillatorsPacing Clin Electrophysiol201639101061106927566614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatlockDDNowelsCTMasoudiFAPatient and cardiologist perceptions on decision making for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a qualitative studyPacing Clin Electrophysiol201134121634164421972983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StandingHExleyCFlynnDA qualitative study of decision-making about the implantation of cardioverter defibrillators and deactivation during end-of-life careHealth Services and Delivery Research2016432
   Google Scholar
• MatlockDDJonesJNowelsCTJenkinsAAllenLAKutnerJSEvidence of cognitive bias in decision making around implantable-cardioverter defibrillators: a qualitative framework analysisJ Card Fail2017231179479928363805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrollSLStrachanPHde LaatSSchwartzLArthurHMPatients’ decision making to accept or decline an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden cardiac deathHealth Expect2013161697921645190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LewisKBNeryPBBirnieDHDecision making at the time of ICD generator change: patients’ perspectivesJAMA Intern Med201417491508151125070249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SepuchaKRBelkoraJKChangYMeasuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgeryBMC Med Inform Decis Mak201212515122681763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar