How psychological distance of a study sample in discrete choice experiments affects preference measurement: a colorectal cancer screening case study

References

• HensherDRoseJMGreeneWHApplied choice analysis: second editionCambridge, UKCambridge University Press2015
   Google Scholar
• LouviereJJHensherDASwaitJDSwait, stated choice methods; analysis and applicationCambridgeCambridge University Press2000
   Google Scholar
• Amaya-AmayaMGerardKUsing Discrete Choice Experiments to Value Health and Health CareDordrechtSpringer2008
   Google Scholar
• ClarkMDDetermannDPetrouSMoroDde Bekker-GrobEWDiscrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literaturePharmacoeconomics201432988390225005924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bekker-GrobEWRyanMGerardKDiscrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literatureHealth Econ201221214517222223558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshallDBridgesJFHauberBConjoint analysis applications in health – how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008Patient20103424925622273432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WatsonVBeckerFde Bekker-GrobEDiscrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysisHealth Econ201726681081727122445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlanzKRimerBKViswanathKBehaviorHEducation: theory, research and practice4th edSan FransiscoJossey-Bass2008
   Google Scholar
• AjzenIFishbeinMUnderstanding attitudes and predicting social behaviorEnglewood Cliffs, NJPretence Hall1980
   Google Scholar
• AjzenIThe theory of planned behaviorOrgan Behav Hum Decis Process1991502179211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FishbeinMAjzenIBelief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and researchReading, MassAAddison-Wesley1975
   Google Scholar
• BeckerMHThe health belief model and personal health behaviorHealth Education MonographsWinter1974111
   Google Scholar
• JanzNKBeckerMHThe health belief model: a decade laterHealth Educ Q19841111476392204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LibermanNTropeYThe role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theoryJ Pers Soc Psychol1998751518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TropeYLibermanNTemporal construalPsychol Rev2003110340342112885109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KahnemanDTverskyAProspect theory: an analysis of decision under riskEconometrica1979472263291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MühlbacherACJuhnkeCPatient preferences versus physicians’ judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?Appl Health Econ Health Policy201311316318023529716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VeldwijkJLambooijMSKallenbergFGPreferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experimentEur J Hum Genet201624336136626036860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HallJFiebigDGKingMTHossainILouviereJJWhat influences participation in genetic carrier testing? Results from a discrete choice experimentJ Health Econ200625352053716243406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuppermannMWangGWongSPreferences for outcomes associated with decisions to undergo or forgo genetic testing for Lynch syndromeCancer2013119121522522786716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatroJMRuthKJWongYNCost sharing and hereditary cancer risk: predictors of willingness-to-pay for genetic testingJ Genet Couns20142361002101124794065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SeverinFSchmidtkeJMühlbacherARogowskiWHEliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experimentsEur J Hum Genet201321111202120823486538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalshJAroraMHosenfeldCLadabaumUKuppermannMKnightSJPreferences for genetic testing to identify hereditary colorectal cancer: perspectives of high-risk patients, community members, and cliniciansJ Canc Educ2012271112119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Gastroenterological AssociationAmerican gastroenterological association medical position statement: hereditary colorectal cancer and genetic testingGastroenterology2001121119519711438508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch Society For Clinical GeneticsCBO guideline hereditary colorectal cancer 2008OisterwijkVan den Boogaard2008
   Google Scholar
• GiardielloFMAllenJIAxilbundJEGuidelines on genetic evaluation and management of Lynch syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-society task force on colorectal cancerAm J Gastroenterol201410981159117925070057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VasenHFAvan der Meulende JongAEde Vos Tot Nederveen CappelWHOliveiraJESMO Guidelines Working GroupFamilial colorectal cancer risk: ESMO clinical recommendationsAnn Oncol200920Supplement 4iv51iv53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HiligsmannMvan DurmeCGeusensPNominal group technique to select attributes for discrete choice experiments: an example for drug treatment choice in osteoporosisPatient Prefer Adherence2013713313923412964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HensherDARoseJMGreeneWHApplied choice analysis: a primerNew YorkCambridge University Press2005
   Google Scholar
• FransenMPvan SchaikTMTwicklerTBEssink-BotMLApplicability of internationally available health literacy measures in the NetherlandsJ Health Commun201116sup 3134149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FiebigDGKeaneMPLouviereJWasiNThe generalized multinomial logit model: Accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneityMark Sci2010293393421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BechMGyrd-HansenDEffects coding in discrete choice experimentsHealth Econ200514101079108315852455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SwaitJLouviereJThe role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit modelsJ Mark Res1993303305314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosenbaumPRRubinDBThe central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika19837014155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilo BensusanIHerrera MartínPAguado ÁlvarezMVProspective study of anxiety in patients undergoing an outpatient colonoscopyRev Esp Enferm Dig20161081276576927785915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikocka-WalusAAMouldsLGRollbuschNAndrewsJM“It’s a tube up your bottom; it makes people nervous”: the experience of anxiety in initial colonoscopy patientsGastroenterol Nurs201235639240123207782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuWAakerJDo you look to the future or focus on today? The impact of life experience on intertemporal decisionsOrgan Behav Hum Decis Process20071022212225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlovicPRisk perception of perception of riskScience198723647992802853563507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade-BenzoniKATostLPHernandezMLarrickRPIt’s only a matter of time: death, legacies, and intergenerational decisionsPsychol Sci201223770470922692338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamiltonRWThompsonDVIs there a substitute for direct experience? Comparing consumers’ preferences after direct and indirect product experiencesJ Consum Res2007344546555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SyrowatkaAKrömkerDMeguerditchianANTamblynRFeatures of computer-based decision aids: systematic review, thematic synthesis, and meta-analysesJ Med Internet Res2016181e2026813512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReichlinLManiNMcArthurKHarrisAMRajanNDacsoCCAssessing the acceptability and usability of an interactive serious game in aiding treatment decisions for patients with localized prostate cancerJ Med Internet Res2011131e421239374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiebermanDAManagement of chronic pediatric diseases with interactive health games: theory and research findingsJ Ambul Care Manage2001241263811189794
   PubMedGoogle Scholar