Advanced search
Publication Cover
Patient Preference and Adherence Volume 13, 2019 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
318
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Patients, health professionals, and the health system: influencers on patients’ participation in ward rounds

Victoria Walton1 Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Anne Hogden1 Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia
,
Janet C Long2 Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
,
Julie K Johnson3 Department of Surgery, Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
&
David Greenfield1 Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, Australian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, Australia
Pages 1415-1429 | Published online: 22 Aug 2019

References

  • Swenne CL, Skytt B. The ward round – patient experiences and barriers to participation. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28(2):297–304. doi:10.1111/scs.1205923808650
  • Walton V, Hogden A, Johnson J, Greenfield D. Ward rounds, participants, roles and perceptions: literature review. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29(4):364–379. doi:10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2015-005327142947
  • Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Shared Decision Making; 2018 Available from: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/shared-decision-making/. Accessed 822, 2018
  • Vahdat S, Hamzehgardeshi L, Hessam S, Hamzehgardeshi Z. Patient involvement in health care decision making: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(1):e12454. doi:10.5812/ircmj.1245424719703
  • Smith SK, Dixon A, Trevena L, Nutbeam D, McCaffery KJ. Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(12):1805–1812. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.05619846245
  • Sweet GS, Wilson HJ. A patient’s experience of ward rounds. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):150–151. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.01620884163
  • Redley B, McTier L, Botti M, et al. Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(1):15–23.
  • Baathe F, Ahlborg G Jr, Lagström A, Edgren L, Nilsson K. Physician experiences of patient-centered and team- based ward rounding – an interview based case-study. J Hosp Adm. 2014;3(6):127–142. doi:10.5430/jha.v3n6p127
  • Creswell J. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2014.
  • O’Leary Z. The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London: SAGE; 2009.
  • Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2014;11(1):25–41. doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
  • Francis JJ, Johnston M, Robertson C, et al. What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychol Health. 2010;25(10):1229–1245. doi:10.1080/0887044090319401520204937
  • Maguire M, Delahunt B. Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. AISHE-J. 2017;8(3):3351–33514.
  • Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: strivingto meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917733847. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: but is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Direction Eval. 2007;2007(114):11–25. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1534-875X
  • Denham MA, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Beyond words: using nonverbal communication data in research to enhance thick description and interpretation. Int J Qual Methods. 2013;12(1):670–696. doi:10.1177/160940691301200137
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2016 Cenus QuickStats; 2018 Available from: https://www.abs.gov.au/websitedbs/D3310114.nsf/Home/2016%20QuickStats. Accessed 617, 2019.
  • O’Leary KJ, Killarney A, Hansen LO, et al. Effect of patient-centred bedside rounds on hospitalised patients’ decision control, activation and satisfaction with care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):921–928. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004561
  • Chow MY, Nikolic S, Shetty A, Lai K. Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds in an Australian tertiary hospital emergency department: patient satisfaction and staff perspectives. Emergency Med Australas. 2019;31(3):347–354.
  • Frosch DL, Kaplan RM. Shared decision making in clinical medicine: past research and future directions. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17(4):285–294.10606197
  • Ekdahl AW, Andersson L, Wiréhn A-B, Friedrichsen M. Are elderly people with co-morbidities involved adequately in medical decision making when hospitalised? A cross-sectional survey. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11(1):46. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-11-4621851611
  • Commission CE. In Safe Hands; 2017 Available from: http://www.cec.health.nsw.gov.au/quality-improvement/team-effectiveness/insafehands. Accessed 95, 2017.
  • Royal College of Physicians and Royal College of Nursing. Ward Rounds in Medicine Principals for Best Practice. London: RCP; 2012.
  • Mazzi MA, Rimondini M, Deveugele M, et al. What do people appreciate in physicians’ communication? An international study with focus groups using videotaped medical consultations. Health Expectations. 2015;18(5):1215–1226. doi:10.1111/hex.1209723796047

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.