Patient Attitudes to Routine Cognitive Testing in Multiple Sclerosis

References

• Sumowski JF, Benedict R, Enzinger C, et al. Cognition in multiple sclerosis: state of the field and priorities for the future. Neurology. 2018;90:278–288. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalah MA, Ayache SS. Deficits in social cognition: an unveiled signature of multiple sclerosis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc (JINS). 2017;23(3):266–286. doi:10.1017/S1355617716001156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruet A. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. In: Brochet B, editor. Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015:227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Benedict RHB, DeLuca J, Enzinger C, et al. Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis: looking back and moving forward. J Int Neuropsychol Soc (JINS). 2017;23:832–842. doi:10.1017/S1355617717000959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett PA, Strober LB. Cognitive and neurobehavioral features in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(11):1276–1281. doi:10.1586/ern.11.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Mortensen G, Rasmussen PV. The impact of quality of life on treatment preferences in multiple sclerosis patients. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017;11:1789–1796. doi:10.2147/PPA.S142373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner IK. Evaluation of cognition and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: daily practice and future directions. Acta Neurol Scand. 2016;134(Suppl 200):19–23. doi:10.1111/ane.12651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips LH, Henry JD, Nouzova E, et al. Difficulties with emotion regulation in multiple sclerosis: links to executive function, mood, and quality of life. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2014;36(8):831–842. doi:10.1080/13803395.2014.946891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter J, Firth J, Enzinger C, et al. Social cognition in multiple sclerosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2016;87:1727–1736. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000003236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachdev PS, Blacker D, Blazer DG, et al. Classifying neurocognitive disorders: the DSM-5 approach. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10:634–642. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito- León J, Morales JM, Rivera-navarro J. Health-related quality of life and its relationship to cognitive and emotional functioning in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(5):497–502. doi:10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretti B, Portaccio E, Zipoli V, et al. Coping strategies, cognitive impairment, psychological variables and their relationship with quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17(5):623–629. doi:10.1007/s10072-010-0372-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen M, Basedow-rajwich B, König N, et al. Functioning and disability in multiple sclerosis from the patient perspective. Chronic Illn. 2011;7(4):291–310. doi:10.1177/1742395311410613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grech LB, Kiropoulos LA, Kirby KM, et al. The effect of executive function on stress, depression, anxiety, and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015;37(5):549–562. doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1037723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ari EB, Johansson S, Ytterberg C, et al. How are cognitive impairment, fatigue and signs of depression related to participation in daily life among persons with multiple sclerosis? Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(23):2012–2018. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.887797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalah MA, Ayache SS. Alexithymia in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of literature. Neuropsychologia. 2017;104:31–47. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Munster CE, Uitdehaag BM. Outcome measures in clinical trials for multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2017;31(3):217–236. doi:10.1007/s40263-017-0412-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverover Y, Chiaravalloti N, DeLuca J. Brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS) and performance of everyday life tasks: actual reality. Mult Scler J (MSJ). 2016;22(4):544–550. doi:10.1177/1352458515593637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontaneda D, Cohen JA, Amato MP. Clinical outcome measures for progressive MS trials. Mult Scler. 2017;23(12):1627–1635. doi:10.1177/1352458517729465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sejbæk T, Blaabjerg M, Sprogøe P, et al. Reliability and validity of a Danish version of the multiple sclerosis neuropsychological screening questionnaire. Int J MS Care. 2018;(20):49–54. doi:10.7241/1537-2073.2017-011
   Google Scholar
• Rao SM, Losinski G, Mourany L, et al. Processing speed test: validation of a self-administered, iPad®-based tool for screening cognitive dysfunction in a clinic setting. Mult Scler. 2017;23(14):1929–1937. doi:10.1177/1352458516688955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niccolai C, Goretti B, Amato MP. Disease modifying treatments and symptomatic drugs for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: where do we stand? Mult Scler Demyelinating Disord. 2017;2(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40893-017-0025-3
   Google Scholar
• Carotenuto A. Look beyond the door, not through the keyhole: evidence from a cognitive assessment including social cognition evaluation in multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(2):205–206. doi:10.1111/ene.13482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goverover Y. Cognition and activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis. In: DeLuca J, Sandroff BM, editors. Cognition and Behavior in Multiple Sclerosis. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2018:171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Sgaramella TM, Carrieri L, Stenta G, et al. Quality of life and adults with multiple sclerosis. In: Merrick J, editor. Public Health: Some International Aspects. Hauppauge (NY): Nova Biomedical Books; 2016:211–219.
   Google Scholar
• Valvano A, Floyd RM, Penwell-waines L, et al. The relationship between cognitive fusion, stigma, and well-being in people with multiple sclerosis. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2016;5(4):266–270. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgaramella TM, Carrieri L, Stenta G, et al. Self-reported executive functioning and satisfaction for quality of life dimensions in adults with multiple sclerosis. Int J Child Health Hum Dev. 2014;7(2):167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Interviews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kiely KM, Butterworth P, Watson N, et al. The symbol digit modalities test: normative data from a large nationally representative sample of Australians. Arch Clin Neuropsych. 2014;(29):767–775. doi:10.1093/arclin/acu055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roar M, Illes Z, Sejbæk T. Practise effect in Symbol Digit Modalities Test in multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab. Mult Scler Rel Disord. 2016;10:116–122. doi:10.1016/j.msard.2016.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict HBR, Amato MP, Boringa J, et al. Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:55. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-12-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadel C. Feltarbeid I egen kultur. En innføring i kvalitativt orientert samfunnsforskning. SEEK a/s. Flekkefjord 1991:97–100.
   Google Scholar
• Winther Jørgensen M, Phillips L. Diskursanalyse Som Teori Og Metode. Roskilde: Roskilde University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Heesen C, Böhm J, Reich C, et al. Patient perception of bodily functions in multiple sclerosis: gait and visual function are the most valuable. Mult Scler. 2008:1–4. doi:10.1177/1352458508088916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosti-otajärvi E, Ruutiainen J, Huhtala H, et al. Relationship between subjective and objective cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130(5):319–327. doi:10.1111/ane.12238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitative in Medisinsk Forskning: En Innføring. Universitetsforlaget. University of Copenhagen; 2011.
   Google Scholar