Preferences for Primary Healthcare Services Among Older Adults with Chronic Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment

References

• World Health Organization. China country assessment report on ageing and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/china-country-assessment/en/. Accessed August 17, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. Bulletin of the sixth national population censusNational Bureau of Statistics; 2010. Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/201104/t20110428_30327.html2011.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical communique of the People’s Republic of China on the 2019 national economic and social development. National Bureau of Statistics; Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wei Yan YL, Zhang R, Chang F. Multimorbidity status of the elderly in China-research based on CHARLS data. Chin J Dis Control Prev. 2019;23(4):426–430.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan G, Nolan A, Lyons S. An investigation of the effect of accessibility to general practitioner services on healthcare utilisation among older people. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:254–263. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom DE, Chen S, Kuhn M, McGovern ME, Oxley L, Prettner K. The economic burden of chronic diseases: estimates and projections for China, Japan, and South Korea. J Econ Ageing. 2018;100163. doi:10.1016/j.jeoa.2018.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lj J, Wj Y. Analysis of change trend of chronic diseases of Chinese residents based on reports of five national health service surveys. Chin Health Ser Manag. 2018;35(11):874–876.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Wang B, Kong Y, Cheng KK. China’s primary health-care reform. Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2064–2066. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60167-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Guiding opinions of the general office of the state council on promoting the construction of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system. General Office of the State Council, PRC; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. China Health Statistics Yearbook 2019. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. China Health Statistics Yearbook 2009. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Yong L. An empirical study on the selection behavior of patients in outpatient clinics under the background of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment. Chin Hosp Manag. 2020;40(6):50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng Y, Xu W, Chen L, Chen F, Fang Y. The influencing factors of health-seeking preference and community health service utilization among patients in primary care reform in Xiamen, China. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:653–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82(1):37–50. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Food and Drug Administration. Patient engagement in the design and conduct of medical device clinical investigations. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Peay HL, Hollin I, Fischer R, Bridges JF. A community-engaged approach to quantifying caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of emerging therapies for duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Ther. 2014;36(5):624–637. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster MM, Earl PE, Haines TP, Mitchell GK. Unravelling the concept of consumer preference: implications for health policy and optimal planning in primary care. Health Policy. 2010;97(2–3):105–112. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font JC, Forns JR, Sato A. Eliciting health care priorities in developing countries: experimental evidence from Guatemala. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(1):67–74. doi:10.1093/heapol/czv022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscat DM, Shepherd HL, Hay L, et al. Discussions about evidence and preferences in real-life general practice consultations with older patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(5):879–887. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAteer A, Yi D, Watson V, et al. Exploring preferences for symptom management in primary care: a discrete choice experiment using a questionnaire survey. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(636):e478–488. doi:10.3399/bjgp15X685705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Watson V. Comparing welfare estimates from payment card contingent valuation and discrete choice experiments. Health Econ. 2009;18(4):389–401. doi:10.1002/hec.1364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Kong Q, de Bekker-grob EW. Public preferences for health care facilities in rural China: a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2019;237:112396. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleij KS, Tangermann U, Amelung VE, Krauth C. Patients’ preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:12. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J, Li J, Zhang Z, Li H, Cai L. Exploring determinants of health provider choice and heterogeneity in preference among outpatients in Beijing: a labelled discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e023363. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Bridges JFP. Explore preference heterogeneity for treatment among people with Type 2 diabetes: a comparison of random-parameters and latent-class estimation techniques. J Choice Model. 2019;30:38–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sever I, Verbic M, Sever EK. Valuing the delivery of dental care: heterogeneity in patients’ preferences and willingness-to-pay for dental care attributes. J Dent. 2018;69:93–101. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milte R, Ratcliffe J, Chen G, Crotty M. What characteristics of nursing homes are most valued by consumers? A Discrete choice experiment with residents and family members. Value Health. 2018;21(7):843–849. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye T, Wang M, Hu W, Liu Y, Shi P. High liabilities or heavy subsidies Farmers’ preferences for crop insurance attributes in Hunan, China. China Agric Econ Rev. 2017;9(4):588–606. doi:10.1108/CAER-06-2016-0093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güneş ED, Yaman H, Çekyay B, Verter V. Matching patient and physician preferences in designing a primary care facility network. J Oper Res Soc. 2017;65(4):483–496. doi:10.1057/jors.2012.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Feng XL. Health care-seeking behaviours and health expenditures in adults aged 45 years and older in China, 2011–2013. Trop Med Int Health. 2017;22(5):638–654. doi:10.1111/tmi.12865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleij KS, Tangermann U, Amelung VE, Krauth C. Patients’ preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):476. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seghieri C, Mengoni A, Nuti S. Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care models. Eur J Health Econ. 2014;15(7):773–785. doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0542-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Notice of the general office of the ministry of health on further promoting appointment diagnosis and treatment services. Medical Administration and Hospital Authority. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tingting Yang JZ. Summarizing related policies and discussing problems about medical service prices in public hospitals. Chin Health Econ. 2015;34(12):66–68.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Exchange rates (indicator). Published 2020. Available from: https://data.oecd.org/conversion/exchange-rates.htm. Accessed August 17, 2020. .
   Google Scholar
• Ravi Dhar AIS. The effect of forced choice on choice. J Mark Res. 2003;40(2):146–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein EA, Bilger M, Flynn TN, Malhotra C. Preferences for end-of-life care among community-dwelling older adults and patients with advanced cancer: a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy. 2015;119(11):1482–1489. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health Commission of the people’s republic of China. China Health Statistics Yearbook 2018. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chang JB, Lusk JL. Mixed logit models: accuracy and software choice. J Appl Econom. 2011;26(1):167–172. doi:10.1002/jae.1201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Howard K, Wilson A, Ward M, Gilbert GL, Degeling C. Public preferences for one health approaches to emerging infectious diseases: a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2019;228:164–171. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliemer MCJ, Rose JM. Confidence intervals of willingness-to-pay for random coefficient logit models. Transport Res B-Meth. 2013;58:199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancsar E, Louviere J, Flynn T. Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(8):1738–1753. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacifico D, Yoo HI. lclogit: a Stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm. Stata J. 2013;13(3):625–639. doi:10.1177/1536867X1301300312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung VCH, Lau CH, Yeoh EK, Griffiths SM. Age, chronic non-communicable disease and choice of traditional Chinese and western medicine outpatient services in a Chinese population. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Li X, Zou ZY, Li C. The prevalence and determinants of using traditional chinese medicine among middle-aged and older Chinese adults: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(11):1002e1001–1005. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boye LK, Mogensen CB, Mechlenborg T, Waldorff FB, Andersen PT. Older multimorbid patients’ experiences on integration of services: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):795. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4644-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang M, Zhang C, Cao H, Chan K, Lu A. The role of Chinese medicine in the treatment of chronic diseases in China. Planta Med. 2011;77(9):873–881. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1270983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Meng F, Wang D, et al. Perceptions of traditional Chinese medicine for chronic disease care and prevention: a cross-sectional study of Chinese hospital-based health care professionals. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018;18(1):209. doi:10.1186/s12906-019-2434-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Y, Mao Z, Xu B, Wu B. Factors associated with traditional Chinese medicine utilization among urban community health centers in Hubei Province of China. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP2489–2497. doi:10.1177/1010539513491415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Xie B, Tao Y, Ma Y, Zhang K. Impact of community-based integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine metabolic syndrome intervention technology in rural residents in Southern Jiangsu, China. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2163–2169. doi:10.12659/MSM.893972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Zhang H, Sun X, et al. Older adults’ choices of first-contact care and related factors in Zhejiang and Qinghai Province, China. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019;19(9):938–944. doi:10.1111/ggi.13746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang S, Meng Q, Chen L, Bekedam H, Evans T, Whitehead M. Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Lancet. 2008;372(9648):1493–1501. doi:10.1684/pnv.2016.0591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnefoy M, Berrut G, Gilbert T. Prevention of impaired mobility in the elderly in primary care: a brief report. Geriatrie Et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement. 2016;14(1):16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sable-Smith A, Arnett KR, Nowels MA, Colborn K, Lum HD, Nowels D. Interactions with the healthcare system influence advance care planning activities: results from a representative survey in 11 developed countries. Fam Pract. 2018;35(3):307–311. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmx113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chylinska J, Lazarewicz M, Rzadkiewicz M, et al. The role of gender in the active attitude toward treatment and health among older patients in primary health care-self-assessed health status and sociodemographic factors as moderators. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):284. doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0677-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Ai-juan MA, Kai F, Jing D, Chen X. The awareness rate, treatment rate, control rate of dyslipidemia and the influencing factors in the residents (18–65 years old) of Beijing. Chin J Prev Control Chronic Dis. 2017;25(7):489–493. doi:10.16386/j.cjpccd.issn.1004-6194.2017.07.003
   Google Scholar