Systematic Review of Studies Using Conjoint Analysis Techniques to Investigate Patients’ Preferences Regarding Osteoarthritis Treatment

References

• Neogi T. The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1145–1153. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B. Osteoarthritis and management. OPROJ. 2019;5(5). doi:10.31031/OPROJ.2019.05.000622
   Google Scholar
• W H O. Chronic rheumatic conditions. Chronic diseases and health promotion. Available from: https://www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en/. Accessed January 8, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper C, Adachi JD, Bardin T, et al. How to define responders in osteoarthritis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29(6):719–729. doi:10.1185/03007995.2013.792793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson AE, Allen KD, Golightly YM, Goode AP, Jordan JM. A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014;43(6):701–712. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overview | osteoarthritis: care and management | guidance | NICE. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg177. Accessed November 7, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B, Hill B. Nursing people with osteoarthritis. Br J Nurs. 2020;29(18):1060–1063. doi:10.12968/bjon.2020.29.18.1060
   Google Scholar
• Hiligsmann M, Pinto D, Dennison E, et al. Patients’ preferences for osteoarthritis treatment: the value of stated-preference studies. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(1):1–3. doi:10.1007/s40520-018-1098-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B, Sim J, Croft P, Frisher M. Generating individual patient preferences for the treatment of osteoarthritis using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint (ACBC) analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4(1):167–182. doi:10.1007/s40744-017-0056-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivero-Santana A, Perestelo-Perez L, Perez-Ramos J, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Serrano-Aguilar P. Treatment preferences in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis: an overview. In: Chen Q, editor. Osteoarthritis - Diagnosis, Treatment and Surgery. InTech;2012. doi:10.5772/26343
   Google Scholar
• Harrison M, Milbers K, Hudson M, Bansback N. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e014719. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and social care act; 2012. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/contents/enacted. Accessed November 7, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham CE, Deal K, Rimas H, et al. Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care. Patient. 2008;1(4):317–330. doi:10.2165/1312067-200801040-00013
   Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, et al. Measuring patient-centered communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(7):1516–1528. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields GE, Brown L, Wells A, Capobianco L, Vass C. Utilising patient and public involvement in stated preference research in health: learning from the existing literature and a case study. Patient. 2020. doi:10.1007/s40271-020-00439-2
   Google Scholar
• Louviere JJ, Lancsar E. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4(4):527–546. doi:10.1017/S1744133109990193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown L, Lee T-H, De Allegri M, Rao K, Bridges JF. Applying stated-preference methods to improve health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017;17(5):441–458. doi:10.1080/14737167.2017.1375854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, Moro D, de Bekker-grob EW. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(9):883–902. doi:10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B. The shared decision for osteoarthritis treatments. OPROJ. 2019;5(5). doi:10.31031/OPROJ.2019.05.000625
   Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rao VR. Conjoint Analysis. In: Sheth J, Malhotra N, editors. Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010. doi:10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02019.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung KL, Wijnen BFM, Hollin IL, et al. Using best-worst scaling to investigate preferences in health care. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(12):1195–1209. doi:10.1007/s40273-016-0429-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne MM, Souchek J, Richardson M, Suarez-Almazor M. Racial/ethnic differences in preferences for total knee replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(10):1078–1086. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Gyrd-Hansen D. Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles’ heel? Health Econ. 2003;12(6):479–491. doi:10.1002/hec.742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall D, Bridges JFP, Hauber B, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health - how are studies being designed and reported?: an update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient. 2010;3(4):249–256. doi:10.2165/11539650-000000000-00000
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health–a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–413. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(5):1–186. doi:10.3310/hta5050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soekhai V, de Bekker-grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(2):201–226. doi:10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soekhai V, Whichello C, Levitan B, et al. Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(7):1324–1331. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B. Patient preferences for the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis using adaptive choice-based conjoint (ACBC) analysis: a pilot study. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2017;5(2):220. doi:10.5750/ejpch.v5i2.1293
   Google Scholar
• Chang J, Kauf TL, Mahajan S, et al. Impact of disease severity and gastrointestinal side effects on the health state preferences of patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(8):2366–2375. doi:10.1002/art.21227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laba T-L, Brien J, Fransen M, Jan S. Patient preferences for adherence to treatment for osteoarthritis: the MEdication Decisions in Osteoarthritis Study (MEDOS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:160. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B, Sim J, Croft P, Frisher M. Patient preferences for the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis: a feasibility study using adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis (ACBCA). Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2015;3(2):253. doi:10.5750/ejpch.v3i2.975
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Suter L, Cunningham CE, Hawker G. Understanding preferences for disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66(8):1186–1192. doi:10.1002/acr.22280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Wittink DR, Concato J, Fried T. Are preferences for cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors influenced by the certainty effect? J Rheumatol. 2004;31(3):591–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Wittink DR, Concato J, Fried T. Informed choice and the widespread use of antiinflammatory drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(2):210–214. doi:10.1002/art.20247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Wittink DR. Treatment options in knee osteoarthritis: the patient’s perspective. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(12):1299–1304. doi:10.1001/archinte.164.12.1299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauber AB, Arden NK, Mohamed AF, et al. A discrete-choice experiment of United Kingdom patients’ willingness to risk adverse events for improved function and pain control in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(2):289–297. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto D, Bockenholt U, Lee J, et al. Preferences for physical activity: a conjoint analysis involving people with chronic knee pain. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2019;27(2):240–247. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman CT, Kirwan T, Share J, Vannabouathong C. Patient preferences regarding surgical interventions for knee osteoarthritis. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;10:1179544117732039. doi:10.1177/1179544117732039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Fried T. If you want patients with knee Osteoarthritis (OA) to Exercise: tell them about NSAIDS. Patient. 2008;1(1):21–26. doi:10.2165/01312067-200801010-00005
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe J, Buxton M, McGarry T, Sheldon R, Chancellor J. Patients’ preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2004;43(3):337–345. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keh038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris CA, Shauver MJ, Yuan F, Nasser J, Chung KC. Understanding patient preferences in proximal interphalangeal joint surgery for osteoarthritis: a conjoint analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(7):615–624.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb EJD, Meads D, Eskyte I, et al. A systematic review of discrete-choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies in people with multiple sclerosis. Patient. 2018;11(4):391–402. doi:10.1007/s40271-017-0296-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orme BK. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. 2nd ed. Research Publishers, LLC; 2009:228.
   Google Scholar
• de Bekker-grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient. 2015;8(5):373–384. doi:10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gan TJ, Lubarsky DA, Flood EM, et al. Patient preferences for acute pain treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92(5):681–688. doi:10.1093/bja/aeh123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orme BK Which conjoint method should i use? Sawtooth technical papers; 2013. Available from: https://sawtoothsoftware.com/resources/technical-papers/which-conjoint-method-should-i-use. Accessed January 7, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel L, Bogardus ST, Concato J, Felson DT, Wittink DR. Patient preferences for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(11):1372–1378. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.019422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmier JK, Palmer CS, Flood EM, Gourlay G. Utility assessments of opioid treatment for chronic pain. Pain Med. 2002;3(3):218–230. doi:10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02045.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B, McMeekin P. Patients’ preferences regarding osteoarthritis medications: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:2501–2515. doi:10.2147/PPA.S283922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Omari B, Frisher M, Croft P, Sim J. FRI0567-PC Using adaptive choice based conjoint (ACBC) analysis to study patients’ preferences regarding pharmaceutical treatment for osteoarthritis (OA). Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(Suppl 3):A567.2-A567. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-eular.1694
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar