Validation of the Chinese Version of the Patient’s Communication Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale (PCSS) in Outpatients After Total Hip Replacement

References

• Kemp KA, Santana MJ, Southern DA, et al. Association of inpatient Hospital experience with patient safety indicators: a cross-sectional, Canadian study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao JK, Anderson LA, Inui TS, et al. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of evidence. Med Care. 2007;45:340–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orth JE, Stiles WB, Scherwitz L, et al. Patient exposition and provider explanation on routine interviews and hypertensive patients’ blood pressure control. Health Psychol. 1987;62:29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruman J, Rovner MH, French EM, et al. From patient education to patient engagement: implications for the field of patient education. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dam HA, van der Horst F, van den Borne B, et al. Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patients self-care and outcome: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;41:17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H.Freeman; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer Y, Bruce S. Knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy and compliance with medical regimen, number of emergency department visits, and hospitalizations in adults with asthma. Heart Lung. 2001;30:250–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL. Active patients as powerful communication. In: Robinson WP, Giles H, editors. The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: Wiley; 2001:541–560.
   Google Scholar
• Rolfson O, Karrholm J, Dahlberg LE, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(7):867–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Bri. 2007;89(7):893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garellick GKJ, Lindahl H, Malchau H, Rogmark C, Rolfson OSHPR Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual report.2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, et al. Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:624–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang QJ, Zhang XL. The current status and hot points of total hip arthroplasty. Chin J Joint Surg. 2015;9(6):718–724.
   Google Scholar
• Hern Á ndez-Padilla JM, Cort É s-Rodr Í Guez AE, Granero-Molina J, et al. Design and psychometric evaluation of the ‘clinical communication self-efficacy toolkit’. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:4534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krantz DS, Baum A, von Wideman M. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:977–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capone V, Petrillo G. Patient’s Communication Perceived Self-efficacy Scale (PCSS): construction and validation of a new measure in a socio-cognitive perspective. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95:340–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne BM, Shavelson RJ, Muthen B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures—The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:456–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald RP. Comments on D.J. Bartholomew, Foundations of factor analysis: some practical implications. Brit J Math Stat Psychol. 1985;38:134–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramada-Rodilla JM, Serra-Pujadas C, Delclós-Clanchet GL. Cross-cultural adaptation and health questionnaires validation: revision and methodological recommendation. Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55(1):57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maly RC, Frank JC, Marsball GN, et al. Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI): validation of an instrument in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:889–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao HW, Luo W, Maly RC, et al. Validation of the Chinese version 10-item perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions scale in patients with osteoarthritis. Patient Prefer Adher. 2016;10:2189–2195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alter native ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993:136–162.
   Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Co-efficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotina JM. What is co-efficient alpha? A examination of theory and applications. J Applied Psychol. 1993;78:98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr KN. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneib T, Hennerfeind A. Bayesian semiparametric multi-state models. Stat Modelling. 2008;8(2):169–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verduijn M, Peek N, Rosseel PM, et al. Prognostic Bayesian networks I: rationale, learning procedure, and clinical use. J Biomed Inform. 2007;40(6):609–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajan R, Scutari M, Lèbre S. Bayesian Networks in R. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schutte NS, Malouff JM. General and realm-specific self-efficacy: connections to life functioning. Curr Psychol. 2016;361–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. J Bus Res. 2008;6:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claramita M, Tuah R, Riskione P, et al. Comparison of communication skills between trained and untrained students using a culturally sensitive nurse-client communication guideline in Indonesia. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;36:236–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong HJ, Bierbrier R, Ma P, et al. An analysis of messages sent between nurses and physicians in deteriorating internal medicine patients to help identify issues in failures to rescue. Int J Med Inform. 2017;100:9–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Padilla JM, Granero-Molina J, Márquez-Hernández, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the arterial puncture self-efficacy scale. Nurse Educ Today. 2016;40:45–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar