148
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Patient Perspectives on the Benefits and Risks of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Qualitative Study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 721-728 | Published online: 12 Apr 2021

References

  • Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. The evolving pattern of symptomatic coronary artery disease in the United States and Canada: baseline characteristics of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive DruG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(2):208–212. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.082
  • Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, et al. Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(15):1395–1407. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1915922
  • Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi H-M, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10115):31–40. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9
  • Chhatriwalla AK, Decker C, Gialde E, et al. Developing and testing a personalized, evidence-based, shared decision-making tool for stent selection in percutaneous coronary intervention using a pre-post study design. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12(2):e005139. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005139
  • Coylewright M, Shepel K, LeBlanc A, et al. Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49827. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049827
  • Goff SL, Mazor KM, Ting HH, Kleppel R, Rothberg MB. How cardiologists present the benefits of percutaneous coronary interventions to patients with stable angina: a qualitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(10):1614–1621. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3328
  • Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Kleppel R, Schweiger M, Hu B, Sepucha KR. Informed decision making for percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(7):1199–1206. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1657
  • Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):9–18. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
  • Denzin NK. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. Routledge; 2017.
  • Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014;41(5):545–547. doi:10.1188/14.ONF.545-547
  • Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage publications; 2018.
  • Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage; 2016.
  • Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
  • Saxon JT, Chan PS, Tran AT, et al. Comparison of patient-reported vs physician-estimated angina in patients undergoing elective and urgent percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e207406. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.7406
  • McQueen A, Vernon SW, Swank PR. Construct definition and scale development for defensive information processing: an application to colorectal cancer screening. Health Psychol. 2013;32(2):190. doi:10.1037/a0027311
  • Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull. 1990;108(3):480. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
  • Druckman JN, McGrath MC. The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nat Clim Change. 2019;9(2):111–119. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1
  • Baker A. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Vol. 323. British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2001.
  • Coylewright M, Dick S, Zmolek B, et al. PCI choice decision aid for stable coronary artery disease: a randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9(6):767–776. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.002641
  • Armstrong K, Putt M, Halbert CH, et al. Prior experiences of racial discrimination and racial differences in health care system distrust. Med Care. 2013;51(2):144. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e31827310a1