Quality of Life After Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Simultaneous Reconstruction Using Pre-Pectoral Silicone Implants

References

• Lostumbo L, Carbine NE, Wallace J. Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;CD002748. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beral V, Million Women Study Collaborators. Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet. 2003;362:419–427. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14065-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morch LS, Skovlund CW, Hannaford PC, Iversen L, Fielding S, Lidegaard O. Contemporary hormonal contraception and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2228–2239. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1700732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney MG, Couch FJ, Visscher DW, Lindor NM. Non-BRCA familial breast cancer: review of reported pathology and molecular findings. Pathology. 2017;49:363–370. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2017.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmana J, Diez O, Rubio IT, Cardoso F, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. BRCA in breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:vi31–vi34. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ, Woods JE, et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a family history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:77–84. doi:10.1056/NEJM199901143400201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF, et al. Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA. 2010;304:967–975. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebbeck TR, Friebel T, Lynch HT, et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1055–1062. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.04.188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B, van Putten WL, et al. Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:159–164. doi:10.1056/NEJM200107193450301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard MA, Sisco M, Yao K, et al. Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: a prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(4):416–422. doi:10.1002/jso.24364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakub JW, Peled AW, Gray RJ, et al. Oncologic safety of prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in a population with BRCA mutations: a multi-institutional study. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:123–129. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell GP, Storm-Dickerson T, Whitworth P, Rubano C, Gabriel A. Advances in nipple-sparing mastectomy: oncological safety and incision selection. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31:310–319. doi:10.1177/1090820X11398111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds C, Davidson JA, Lindor NM, et al. Prophylactic and therapeutic mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers: can the nipple be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3102–3109. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1908-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González EG, Rancatti AO. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Gland Surg. 2015;4:541–553. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.04.21
   Google Scholar
• Thorat MA, Balasubramanian R. Breast cancer prevention in high-risk women. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;65:18–31. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei CH, Scott AM, Price AN, et al. Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J. 2016;22:10–17. doi:10.1111/tbj.12542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: scoping review. SAGE Open Med. 2016;4:2050312116671725. doi:10.1177/2050312116671725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morfeld M, Kirchberger I, Bullinger M. Short-Form-36 Health Survey. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Turner-Bowker DM, Saris-Baglama RN, DeRosa MA, Giovannetti ER, Jensen RE, Wu AW. A computerized adaptive version of the SF-36 is feasible for clinic and internet administration in adults with HIV. AIDS Care. 2012;24:886–896. doi:10.1080/09540121.2012.656573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treanor C, Donnelly M. A methodological review of the short form health survey 36 (SF-36) and its derivatives among breast cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(2):339–362. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0785-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(4):823–829. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000278162.82906.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Matros E, Fine N, et al. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(22):2499–2506. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:149–162. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Cordiero PG, Pusic AL. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:293–302. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aec6b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colizzi L, Lazzeri D, Agostini T, et al. Skin-reducing mastectomy: new refinements. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2010;44:296–301. doi:10.3109/2000656X.2010.517681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis. 1978;37:378–381. doi:10.1136/ard.37.4.378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. Short-Form-36 Health Survey. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH & Co. KG; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2:217–227. doi:10.1002/hec.4730020305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dean NR, Crittenden T. A five year experience of measuring clinical effectiveness in a breast reconstruction service using the BREAST-Q patient reported outcomes measure: a cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(11):1469–1477. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howes BH, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR. Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:1184–1191. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong T, Hu J, Bagher S, et al. A comparison of psychological response, body image, sexuality, and quality of life between immediate and delayed autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective long-term outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:772–780. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mau C, Untch M. Prophylactic surgery: for whom, when and how? Breast Care. 2017;12:379–384. doi:10.1159/000485830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung NM, Boughey JC, Pierce LJ, et al. Management of hereditary breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2020:JCO2000299. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.00299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Felice F, Marchetti C, Musella A, et al. Bilateral risk-reduction mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2876–2880. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4532-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domchek SM. Risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a complex discussion. JAMA. 2019;321:27. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.18942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt KK, Euhus DM, Boughey JC, et al. Society of surgical oncology breast disease working group statement on prophylactic (risk-reducing) mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:375–397. doi:10.1245/s10434-016-5688-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbine NE, Lostumbo L, Wallace J, Ko H. Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;4:CD002748. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermel DJ, Wood ME, Chun J, et al. Multi-institutional evaluation of women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17:427–432. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2017.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didier F, Arnaboldi P, Gandini S, et al. Why do women accept to undergo a nipple sparing mastectomy or to reconstruct the nipple areola complex when nipple sparing mastectomy is not possible? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;132:1177–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews H, Carroll N, Renshaw D, et al. Predictors of satisfaction and quality of life following post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Psychooncology. 2017;26:1860–1865. doi:10.1002/pon.4397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltahir Y, Werners LL, Dreise MM, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes between mastectomy alone and breast reconstruction: comparison of patient-reported BREAST-Q and other health-related quality-of-life measures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:201e–209e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829586a7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugrue R, MacGregor G, Sugrue M, Curran S, Murphy L. An evaluation of patient reported outcomes following breast reconstruction utilizing breast Q. Breast. 2013;22:158–161. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, Little JW 3rd. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80:699–704. doi:10.1097/00006534-198711000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey CR, Ogbuagu O, Baltodano PA, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes improve with nipple-sparing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:219–226. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, et al. Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3324–3330. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4761-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamelinck VC, Bastiaannet E, Pieterse AH, et al. Patients’ preferences for surgical and adjuvant systemic treatment in early breast cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2014;40:1005–1018. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118:623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mufarrej FM, Woods JE, Jacobson SR. Simultaneous mastopexy in patients undergoing prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:747–755. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone M, Cogliandro A, Signoretti M, Persichetti P. Analysis of symmetry stability following implant-based breast reconstruction and contralateral management in 582 patients with long-term outcomes. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2018;42:936–940. doi:10.1007/s00266-018-1082-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter S, Brigic A, Whiting PF, et al. Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:31–46. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq438
   Google Scholar
• Razdan SN, Patel V, Jewell S, McCarthy CM. Quality of life among patients after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes. Qual Life Res. 2016;25:1409–1421. doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1181-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56:462–470. doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00198-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:769–776. doi:10.1097/00006534-200009040-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy V, Chamberlain RS. Defining a place for nipple sparing mastectomy in modern breast care: an evidence based review. Breast J. 2013;19:571–581. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda S, Tamaki Y, Yano K, et al. Cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after skin-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer with immediate reconstruction of the breast. Surgery. 2008;143:414–425. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2007.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghilli M, Mariniello MD, Camilleri V, et al. PROMs in post-mastectomy care: patient self-reports (BREAST-Q™) as a powerful instrument to personalize medical services. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1034–1040. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy CM, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Qi J, Wilkins E, Pusic AL. Impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction on health-related quality of life in women at high risk for breast carcinoma: results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2502–2508. doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5915-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peled AW, Duralde E, Foster RD, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate expander-implant reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;72:S48–S52. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fracol M, Feld LN, Chiu W-K, Kim JYS. An overview of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2018;8:95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker BG, Irri R, MacCallum V, Chattopadhyay R, Murphy J, Harvey JR. A prospective comparison of short-term outcomes of subpectoral and prepectoral strattice-based immediate breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:1077–1084. doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000004270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruccia M, Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Onesti MG. One-stage breast reconstruction techniques in elderly patients to preserve quality of life. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20:5058–5066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangarajah F, Treeter T, Krug B, et al. Comparison of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer patients: a retrospective hospital-based cohort study. Breast Care. 2019;14:382–387. doi:10.1159/000496696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker H, Lind JG 2nd, Hopkins EG. Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using a vertical incision. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e412. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000384
   Google Scholar
• Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove NM, et al. Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;139:287–294. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onesti MG, Maruccia M, Di Taranto G, et al. Clinical, histological, and ultrasound follow-up of breast reconstruction with one-stage muscle-sparing “wrap” technique: a single-center experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1527–1536. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2017.06.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruccia M, Di Taranto G, Onesti MG. One-stage muscle-sparing breast reconstruction in elderly patients: a new tool for retaining excellent quality of life. Breast J. 2018;24:180–183. doi:10.1111/tbj.12860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macadam S, Lennox PA. Acellular dermal matrices: use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20:75–89. doi:10.1177/229255031202000201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maruccia M, Elia R, Gurrado A, et al. Skin-reducing mastectomy and pre-pectoral breast reconstruction in large ptotic breasts. Aesth Plast Surg. 2020;44:664–672. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01616-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:891–899. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585–1595. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb6351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro O, Mestak O, Vindigni V, et al. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes after implant versus autologous tissue breast reconstruction using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5:e1217. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001217
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan SR, Fletcher DR, Isom CD, Isik FF. True incidence of all complications following immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:19–28. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181774267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woerdeman LA, Hage JJ, Hofland MM, Rutgers EJT. A prospective assessment of surgical risk factors in 400 cases of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants to establish selection criteria. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119:455–463. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000246379.99318.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar