Understanding Treatment Preferences of Australian Patients Living with Treatment-Resistant Depression

References

• Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905–1917. doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter SE, Barber JP. Should treatment for depression be based more on patient preference? Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013;7:1047–1057. doi:10.2147/PPA.S52746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers AL, Rose JP, Fowler SL, Rasinski HM, Brown JA, Helfer SG. Why does choice enhance treatment effectiveness? Using placebo treatments to demonstrate the role of personal control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013;105(4):549–566. doi:10.1037/a0034005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions--challenges for doctors. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):542–545. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health. Clinical practice in youth mental health: Shared decision making. Orygen - The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health; Published 2016. Available from: https://orygen.org.au/Training/Resources/General-resources/Clinical-practice-points/Shared-decision-making. Accessed January 21, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Legare F, Simmons MB, et al. Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother? Med J Aust. 2014;201(1):35–39. doi:10.5694/mja14.00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi GS, Bassett D, Boyce P, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015;49(12):1087–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi GS, Bell E, Bassett D, et al. The 2020 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2021;55(1):7–117. doi:10.1177/0004867420979353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–1367. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhiem O, Bennett CB, Trentacosta CJ, McLear C. Client preferences affect treatment satisfaction, completion, and clinical outcome: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(6):506–517. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windle E, Tee H, Sabitova A, Jovanovic N, Priebe S, Carr C. Association of patient treatment preference with dropout and clinical outcomes in adult psychosocial mental health interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(3):294–302. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelhorn HL, Sexton CC, Classi PM. Patient preferences for treatment of major depressive disorder and the impact on health outcomes: a systematic review. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(5).
   Google Scholar
• Dwight-Johnson M, Sherbourne CD, Liao D, Wells KB. Treatment preferences among depressed primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(8):527–534. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08035.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yrondi A, Rieu J, Massip C, Bongard V, Schmitt L. Depressed patients’ preferences for type of psychotherapy: a preliminary study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1371–1374. doi:10.2147/PPA.S87270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann TM, Clouth J, Elosge M, et al. Patient preferences for outcomes of depression treatment in Germany: a choice-based conjoint analysis study. J Affect Disord. 2013;148(2–3):210–219. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu DF, Rosenbaum JF, Alpert JE. Pharmacological approaches to the challenge of treatment-resistant depression. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17(2):111–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekadu A, Donocik JG, Cleare AJ. Standardisation framework for the Maudsley staging method for treatment resistance in depression. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):100. doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1679-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstone LL. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev. 1927;34(4):273. doi:10.1037/h0070288
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster KJ. A new approach to consumer theory. J Political Econ. 1966;74(2):132–157. doi:10.1086/259131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers of Econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974:105–142.
   Google Scholar
• Soekhai V, de Bekker-grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. PharmacoEconomics. 2019;37(2):201–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coast J, Al-Janabi H, Sutton EJ, et al. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Econ. 2012;21(6):730–741. doi:10.1002/hec.1739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler GM, Iosifescu DV, Pollack MH, Targum SD, Fava M. RESEARCH: validation of the Massachusetts General Hospital Antidepressant Treatment History Questionnaire (ATRQ). CNS Neurosci Ther. 2010;16(5):322–325. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2009.00102.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orme B. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. Fourth ed. Madison, Wisconsin: Research Publishers LLC; 2010; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rose JM, Bliemer MC. Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transport Rev. 2009;29(5):587–617. doi:10.1080/01441640902827623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–413. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16(1):3–13. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists. Keeping your head above water: affordability as a barrier to mental health care; 2014. Available from: https://www.ranzcp.org/files/resources/reports/keeping-your-head-above-water-affordability-as-a.aspx. Accessed June 30, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Revicki DA, Wood M. Patient-assigned health state utilities for depression-related outcomes: differences by depression severity and antidepressant medications. J Affect Disord. 1998;48(1):25–36. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00117-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey E, Thacher JA, Craighead WE. Patient preferences for depression treatment programs and willingness to pay for treatment. J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007;10(2):73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittink MN, Cary M, Tenhave T, Baron J, Gallo JJ. Towards patient-centered care for depression: conjoint methods to tailor treatment based on preferences. Patient. 2010;3(3):145–157. doi:10.2165/11530660-000000000-00000
   Google Scholar
• Eiring O, Landmark BF, Aas E, Salkeld G, Nylenna M, Nytroen K. What matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disorders. BMJ Open. 2015;5(4):e007848. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar