167
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Effects of Hand Holding on Anxiety and Pain During Prostate Biopsies: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1593-1600 | Published online: 16 Jul 2021

References

  • Kucur M, Goktas S, Kaynar M, et al. Selective low-dose spinal anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective and randomized study. J Endourol. 2015;29(12):1412–1417. doi:10.1089/end.2015.0450
  • Packiam VT, Nottingham CU, Cohen AJ, Eggener SE, Gerber GS. No effect of music on anxiety and pain during transrectal prostate biopsies: a randomized trial. Urology. 2018;117:31–35. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.04.014
  • Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J, Siegel YI, Lindner A. The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: a prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. J Urol. 2001;165(2):445–454. doi:10.1097/00005392-200102000-00023
  • Li M, Wang Z, Li H, et al. Local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–8. doi:10.1038/srep40421
  • Kim DK, Lee JY, Jung JH, et al. What is the most effective local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 47 randomized clinical trials. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–14. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41412-w
  • Dell’Atti L. Impact of music on anxiety and pain perception among men undergoing prostate biopsy: synthesis of qualitative literature. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021;43:101330. doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101330
  • Che X, Cash R, Fitzgerald P, Fitzgibbon BM. The social regulation of pain: autonomic and neurophysiological changes associated with perceived threat. J Pain. 2018;19(5):496–505. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.12.007
  • Graff TC, Luke SG, Birmingham WC. Supportive hand-holding attenuates pupillary responses to stress in adult couples. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):1–20. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212703
  • Coan JA, Schaefer HS, Davidson RJ. Lending a hand: social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(12):1032–1039. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01832.x
  • Kim BH, Kang HY, Choi EY. Effects of handholding and providing information on anxiety in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(23–24):3459–3468. doi:10.1111/jocn.12928
  • Bayrampour H, McDonald S, Fung T, Tough S. Reliability and validity of three shortened versions of the State Anxiety Inventory scale during the perinatal period. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;35(3):101–107. doi:10.3109/0167482X.2014.950218
  • Roberts MH, Klatzkin RR, Mechlin B. Social support attenuates physiological stress responses and experimental pain sensitivity to cold pressor pain. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49(4):557–569. doi:10.1007/s12160-015-9686-3
  • Bastide C, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Ortega JC, Coulange C. Tolerance of pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: risk factors. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003;6(3):239–241. doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500664
  • Sonmez G, Tombul ST, Demirtas T, Demirtas A. Risk factors associated with pain in fusion prostate biopsy. Prostate Int. 2020;8(4):185–189. doi:10.1016/j.prnil.2020.05.004
  • Demirtaş A, Sönmez G, Tombul ŞT, Demirtaş T. Comparison of pain levels in fusion prostate biopsy and standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Int Braz j Urol. 2020;46(4):557–562. doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0154
  • Sönmez G, Baydilli N, Tombul ŞT, Güler G, Demirtaş A. Comparison of lidocaine and prilocaine efficiencies in periprostatic nerve block for transrectal prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective study. Bull Urooncol. 2019;18(1):1–5. doi:10.4274/uob.galenos.2018.1096
  • Grinberg AS, Sellinger JJ, Sprenkle PC, et al. Effect of diaphragmatic breathing on procedural anxiety during transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology. 2020;137:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.12.024
  • Cho SW, Choi HJ. Effect of music on reducing anxiety for patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: randomized prospective trial. Urol J. 2016;13(2):2612–2614. doi:10.22037/uj.v13i2.3187
  • Kwon WA, Lee JW, Seo HK, et al. Hand-holding during cystoscopy decreases patient anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Urol Int. 2018;100(2):222–227. doi:10.1159/000485745
  • Gezginci E, Iyigun E, Kibar Y, Bedir S. Three distraction methods for pain reduction during cystoscopy: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects on pain, anxiety, and satisfaction. J Endourol. 2018;32(11):1078–1084. doi:10.1089/end.2018.0491
  • Bernardes SF, Forgeron P, Fournier K, Reszel J. Beyond solicitousness: a comprehensive review on informal pain-related social support. Pain. 2017;158(11):2066–2076. doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001033
  • Morelli SA, Torre JB, Eisenberger NI. The neural bases of feeling understood and not understood. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014;9(12):1890–1896. doi:10.1093/scan/nst191
  • Chatel-Goldman J, Congedo M, Jutten C, Schwartz JL. Touch increases autonomic coupling between romantic partners. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8:95. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00095
  • Goldstein P, Shamay-Tsoory SG, Yellinek S, Weissman-Fogel I. Empathy predicts an experimental pain reduction during touch. J Pain. 2016;17(10):1049–1057. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.06.007
  • Lamm C, Silani G, Singer T. Distinct neural networks underlying empathy for pleasant and unpleasant touch. Cortex. 2015;70:79–89. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.01.021
  • Fusaro M, Tieri G, Aglioti SM. Seeing pain and pleasure on self and others: behavioral and psychophysiological reactivity in immersive virtual reality. J Neurophysiol. 2016;116(6):2656–2662. doi:10.1152/jn.00489.2016
  • von Mohr M, Krahé C, Beck B, Fotopoulou A. The social buffering of pain by affective touch: a laser-evoked potential study in romantic couples. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018;13(11):1121–1130. doi:10.1093/scan/nsy085
  • Goldstein P, Weissman-Fogel I, Dumas G, Shamay-Tsoory SG. Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(11):E2528–E2537. doi:10.1073/pnas.1703643115