Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review

References

• World Cancer Day: Breast cancer overtakes lung cancer in terms of number of new cancer cases worldwide. IARC showcases key research projects to address breast cancer; 2021. Available from: https://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/world-cancer-day-2021/. Accessed February 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today. Accessed February 1, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins EJ. Overview of breast cancer. JAAPA. 2019;32(10):13–17. doi:10.1097/01.JAA.0000580524.95733.3d
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houssami N, Turner RM, Morrow M. Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017;165(2):273–283. doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4324-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unukovych D, Johansson H, Brandberg Y. Preoperative psychosocial characteristics may predict body image and sexuality two years after risk-reducing mastectomy: a prospective study. Gland Surg. 2017;6(1):64–72. doi:10.21037/gs.2017.01.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi M, Salimi S, Barahmand N, Fahimnia F, Allahbakhshian Farsani L. Postmastectomy information needs and information-seeking motives for women with breast cancer. Adv Biomed Res. 2018;7:75. doi:10.4103/abr.abr_187_17
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo MI, Cullen J, Hwang YT, Rowland JH, Mandelblatt JS. Breast cancer treatment in older women: does getting what you want improve your long-term body image and mental health? J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(19):4002–4009. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell-Enns H, Woodgate R. The psychosocial experiences of women with breast cancer across the lifespan: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13(1):112–121. doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1795
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNeely ML, Binkley JM, Pusic AL, Campbell KL, Gabram S, Soballe PW. A prospective model of care for breast cancer rehabilitation: postoperative and postreconstructive issues. Cancer. 2012;118(8 Suppl):2226–2236. doi:10.1002/cncr.27468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danino MA, Giaccone D, El Khatib A, et al. Immediate breast reconstruction surgery with expander/direct implant and use of acellular dermal matrix: does hormone therapy increases the risk of infection? Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2020;65(4):277–283. doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2020.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin NL, Tandon VJ, Hawley ST, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of decision aids to improve decision making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2019;39(1):5–20. doi:10.1177/0272989X18803879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraskeva N, Guest E, Lewis-Smith H, Harcourt D. Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to support patient decision making about breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Breast. 2018;40:97–105. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2018.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuirter M, Castiglia LL, Loiselle CG, Wong N. Decision-making process of women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who have chosen prophylactic mastectomy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(3):313–320. doi:10.1188/10.ONF.313-320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myckatyn TM, Parikh RP, Lee C, Politi MC. Challenges and solutions for the implementation of shared decision-making in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8(2):e2645. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002645
   Google Scholar
• Lamore K, Flahault C, Untas A. Women and partners’ information need, emotional adjustment, and breast reconstruction decision-making before mastectomy. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2020;28(3):179–188. doi:10.1177/2292550320928558
   Google Scholar
• Santosa KB, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL. Long-term patient-reported outcomes in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(10):891–899. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato L, Loreti A, Cortese G, et al. Regret and quality of life after mastectomy with or without reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2020;S1526-8209(19)30736–0. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2019.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sabawi B, Ho AL, Sosin M, Patel KM. Patient-centered outcomes of breast reconstruction in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(6):768–780. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SK, Hare RM, Kuang RJ, Smith KM, Brown BJ, Hunter-Smith DJ. Breast reconstruction post mastectomy: patient satisfaction and decision making. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(6):640–644. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000000242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361–1367. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci. 2016;11:114. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truglio-Londrigan M, Slyer JT. Shared decision-making for nursing practice: an integrative review. Open Nurs J. 2018;12:1–14. doi:10.2174/1874434601812010001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beers E, Lee Nilsen M, Johnson JT. The role of patients: shared decision-making. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2017;50(4):689–708. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2017.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BT, Agarwal JP, Ascherman JA, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline: autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP or pedicled TRAM abdominal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(5):651e–664e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inokuchi M, Kutomi G, Kijima Y, et al. The Japanese Breast Cancer Society clinical practice guidelines for surgical treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2020;27(1):4–8. doi:10.1007/s12282-019-01030-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks MP, Verbeek XAAM, van Manen JG, et al. Clinical decision trees support systematic evaluation of multidisciplinary team recommendations. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020;183(2):355–363. doi:10.1007/s10549-020-05769-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biganzoli L, Cardoso F, Beishon M, et al. The requirements of a specialist breast centre. Breast. 2020;51:65–84. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2020.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamnett KE, Subramanian A. Breast reconstruction in older patients: a literature review of the decision-making process. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(10):1325–1334. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boateng J, Lee CN, Foraker RE, et al. Implementing an electronic clinical decision support tool into routine care: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ perceptions of a post-mastectomy breast reconstruction tool. MDM Policy Pract. 2021;6(2):23814683211042010. doi:10.1177/23814683211042010
   Google Scholar
• Grabinski VF, Myckatyn TM, Lee CN, Philpott-Streiff SE, Politi MC. Importance of shared decision-making for vulnerable populations: examples from postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Health Equity. 2018;2:234–238. doi:10.1089/heq.2018.0020
   Google Scholar
• Ogrodnik A, MacLennan S, Weaver D, James T. Barriers to completing delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a critical need for patient and clinician education. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(4):700–706. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1046-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–385. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32. doi:10.1080/136455703200-0119616
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Dg A, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng M. Analysis of the current situation of shared decision-making in breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a scoping review protocol.
   Google Scholar
• The Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2015 edition/Supplement. Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Légaré F, Boland L, et al. 20th anniversary Ottawa decision support framework: part 3 overview of systematic reviews and updated framework. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(3):379–398. doi:10.1177/0272989X20911870
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman KA, Harcourt DM, Lam TC, Shaw LK, Boyages J. BRECONDA: development and acceptability of an interactive decisional support tool for women considering breast reconstruction. Psychooncology. 2014;23(7):835–838. doi:10.1002/pon.3498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman KA, Shaw LE, Winch CJ, et al., BRECONDA Collaborative Research Group. Reducing decisional conflict and enhancing satisfaction with information among women considering breast reconstruction following mastectomy: results from the BRECONDA Randomized Controlled Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(4):592e–602e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman KA, Shaw LK, Jørgensen L, et al. Qualitatively understanding patients’ and health professionals’ experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid. Psychooncology. 2017;26(10):1618–1624. doi:10.1002/pon.4346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson B, Sherman KA, Brown P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of the BRECONDA decision aid for women with breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2018;27(6):1589–1596. doi:10.1002/pon.4698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollow P, Paraskeva N, Clarke A, et al. ‘They were aware of who I was as a person’: patients’ and health professionals’ experiences of using the PEGASUS intervention to facilitate decision-making around breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021;30:e13464. doi:10.1111/ecc.13464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke A, Paraskeva N, White P, Tollow P, Hansen E, Harcourt D. PEGASUS: the design of an intervention to facilitate shared decision-making in breast reconstruction. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36(3):508–518. doi:10.1007/s13187-019-01656-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt D, Paraskeva N, White P, Powell J, Clarke A. A study protocol of the effectiveness of PEGASUS: a multi-centred study comparing an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with treatment as usual. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):143. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0543-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne SL, Topham N, D’Agostino TA, et al. Acceptability and pilot efficacy trial of a web-based breast reconstruction decision support aid for women considering mastectomy. Psychooncology. 2016;25(12):1424–1433. doi:10.1002/pon.3984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Liyuan S, Jingyue Z. Analysis of decision status and influencing factors of patients after breast cancer. J Nurse Stud. 2019;34(13):1225–1227.
   Google Scholar
• Frisell A, Lagergren J, de Boniface J. National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates. Br J Surg. 2016;103(12):1640–1648. doi:10.1002/bjs.10286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore L, Myckatyn TM, Gao F, et al. Reconstruction patterns in a single institution cohort of women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(10):3223–3229. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2530-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CN, Belkora J, Chang Y, Moy B, Partridge A, Sepucha K. Are patients making high-quality decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):18–26. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f958de
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ligt KM, van Bommel ACM, Schreuder K, et al., NABON Breast Cancer Audit Working Group. The effect of being informed on receiving immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(5):717–724. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naiyuan T. Multienter Study on Breast Reconstruction and Impact Factors in Breast Cancer Patients [dissertation]. Peking Union Medical College; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Radecki MA, et al. Delayed autologous breast reconstruction: factors which influence patient decision making. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(11):1513–1520. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum S, Grunfeld EA, Ho-Asjoe M, Farhadi J. An exploration of patient decision-making for autologous breast reconstructive surgery following a mastectomy. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(1):105–110. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Costa D, Wong A, Snook K, Spillane A. An evaluation of factors affecting preference for immediate, delayed or no breast reconstruction in women with high-risk breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2016;25(12):1463–1469. doi:10.1002/pon.4087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple-Oberle C, Ayeni O, Webb C, Bettger-Hahn M, Ayeni O, Mychailyshyn N. Shared decision-making: applying a person-centered approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(7):796–800. doi:10.1002/jso.23721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui KJ, Liu XX, Luan A, Lee GK. Design and focus test of a preconsultation decision aid for breast cancer reconstruction patients: a quality improvement initiative. Eplasty. 2015;15:e24.
   Google Scholar
• López M, Inmaculada DM-F, Rodríguez A, Muñoz M. ReconstrucciÓn inmediata en cÁncer de mama. ¿las mujeres estÁn satisfechas con su decisiÓn? Psicooncología. 2015;12(2):393–403. doi:10.5209/rev_PSIC.2015.v12.n2-3.51017
   Google Scholar
• Lee CN, Hultman CS, Sepucha K. What are patients’ goals and concerns about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(5):567–569. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181bffc9b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo NT, Kuo YL, Lai HW, Ko NY, Fang SY. The influence of partner involvement in the decision-making process on body image and decision regret among women receiving breast reconstruction. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(5):1721–1728. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4416-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson JA, Tchou J, Domchek S, Sonnad SS, Serletti JM, Wu LC. Breast reconstruction in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy patients: factors that influence decision making. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(11):1481–1489. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasak JM, Myckatyn TM, Grabinski VF, Philpott SE, Parikh RP, Politi MC. Stakeholders’ perspectives on postmastectomy breast reconstruction: recognizing ways to improve shared decision making. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(11):e1569. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001569
   Google Scholar
• Lee CN, Hultman CS, Sepucha K. Do patients and providers agree about the most important facts and goals for breast reconstruction decisions? Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(5):563–566. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181c01279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamore K, Flahault C, Fasse L, Untas A. Waiting for breast reconstruction”: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of heterosexual couples’ experiences of mastectomy for breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019;42:42–49. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2019.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causarano N, Platt J, Baxter NN, et al. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(5):1365–1375. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2479-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman AS, Cantor SB, Fingeret MC, et al. Considering breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a patient decision aid video and workbook. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019;7(11):e2500. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000002500
   Google Scholar
• Potter S, Mills N, Cawthorn S, Wilson S, Blazeby J. Exploring inequalities in access to care and the provision of choice to women seeking breast reconstruction surgery: a qualitative study. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(5):1181–1191. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr TL, Groot G, Cochran D, Vancoughnett M, Holtslander L. Exploring women’s support needs after breast reconstruction surgery: a Qualitative Study. Cancer Nurs. 2019;42(2):E1–E9. doi:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin PJ, Fang SY, Kuo YL. Development and usability testing of a decision support app for women considering breast reconstruction surgery. J Cancer Educ. 2021;36(1):160–167. doi:10.1007/s13187-019-01612-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan ZW, Xiaoyuan W, Liyuan S, et al. Construction and application of decision assistance for patients with breast breast reconstruction surgery. Chin Nurs J. 2020;55(01):90–95.
   Google Scholar
• Politi MC, Lee CN, Philpott-Streiff SE, et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the BREASTChoice tool for personalized decision support about breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg. 2020;271(2):230–237. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Stege JA, Woerdeman LAE, Hahn DEE, et al. The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):165. doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0873-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman KA, Kilby CJ, Shaw LK, et al. Facilitating decision-making in women undergoing genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer: BRECONDA randomized controlled trial results. Breast. 2017;36:79–85. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt J, Baxter N, Jones J, et al. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:199. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam WW, Chan M, Or A, Kwong A, Suen D, Fielding R. Reducing treatment decision conflict difficulties in breast cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(23):2879–2885. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.45.1856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf AA, Colakoglu S, Nguyen JT, et al. Patient involvement in the decision-making process improves satisfaction and quality of life in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):665–670. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananian P, Houvenaeghel G, Protière C, et al. Determinants of patients’ choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(8):762–771. doi:10.1245/ASO.2004.11.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au AH, Lam WW, Chan MC, et al. Development and pilot-testing of a Decision Aid for use among Chinese women facing breast cancer surgery. Health Expect. 2011;14(4):405–416. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00655.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam A, Secord S, Butler K, et al. A breast reconstruction needs assessment: how does self-efficacy affect information access and preferences? Can J Plast Surg. 2012;20(1):37–42. doi:10.1177/229255031202000101
   Google Scholar
• Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ. Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(3):717–724. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e318180ed06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zisman-Ilani Y, Obeidat R, Fang L, Hsieh S, Berger Z. Shared decision making and patient-centered care in Israel, Jordan, and the United States: exploratory and comparative survey study of physician perceptions. JMIR Form Res. 2020;4(8):e18223. doi:10.2196/18223
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe K, Zhong T, O’Neill AC, et al. Development and testing of a decision aid for women considering delayed breast reconstruction. J Plastic, Reconstructive Aesthetic Surg. 2018;71(3):318–326. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne SL, Topham N, D’Agostino TA, et al. Acceptability and pilot efficacy trial of a web-based breast reconstruction decision support aid for women considering mastectomy. Psychooncology. 2016;25(12):1424–1433. doi:10.1002/pon.3984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavazos-Rehg PA, Fitzsimmons-Craft EE, Krauss MJ, et al. Examining the self-reported advantages and disadvantages of socially networking about body image and eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;53(6):852–863. doi:10.1002/eat.23282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passow S, Thurm F, Li SC. Activating developmental reserve capacity via cognitive training or non-invasive brain stimulation: potentials for promoting fronto-parietal and hippocampal-striatal network functions in old age. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:33. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Málaga G, Romero ZO, Málaga AS, Cuba-Fuentes S. Shared decision making and the promise of a respectful and equitable healthcare system in Peru. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2017;123–124:81–84. doi:10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isselhard A, Töpper M, Berger-Höger B, et al. Implementation and evaluation of a nurse-led decision-coaching program for healthy breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers: a study protocol for the randomized controlled EDCP-BRCA study. Trials. 2020;21(1):501. doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04431-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland L, Graham ID, Légaré F, et al. Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review. IS. 2019;14(1):7. doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covvey JR, Kamal KM, Gorse EE, et al. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(5):1613–1637. doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04675-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell A, Buffo A, Campbell TC, Ehlenbach WJ. The critical care nurse communicator program: an integrated primary palliative care intervention. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2020;32(2):265–279. doi:10.1016/j.cnc.2020.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaby MA, Chrisp P. NICE supports shared decision making. BMJ. 2019;364:l1038. doi:10.1136/bmj.l1038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nealon KP, Weitzman RE, Sobti N, et al. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: safety outcome endpoints and delineation of risk factors. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(5):898e–908e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sada A, Day CN, Hoskin TL, Degnim AC, Habermann EB, Hieken TJ. Mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in the elderly: trends and outcomes. Surgery. 2019;166(4):709–714. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk C, Ozturk CN, Platek M, et al. Management of expander- and implant-associated infections in breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(6):2075–2082. doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01923-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricci JA, Epstein S, Momoh AO, Lin SJ, Singhal D, Lee BT. A meta-analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction and timing of adjuvant radiation therapy. J Surg Res. 2017;218:108–116. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt JL, Wetzel CM, Lange KW, Heine N, Ortmann O. Patients’ experience of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and its influence on postoperative satisfaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;296(4):827–834. doi:10.1007/s00404-017-4495-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallbjörk U, Rasmussen BH, Karlsson S, Salander P. Aspects of body image after mastectomy due to breast cancer - A two-year follow-up study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17(3):340–345. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2012.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CN, Pignone MP, Deal AM, et al. Accuracy of predictions of patients with breast cancer of future well-being after immediate breast reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(4):e176112. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholl I, LaRussa A, Hahlweg P, Kobrin S, Elwyn G. Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them - A scoping review. IS. 2018;13(1):40. doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0731-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kew KM, Malik P, Aniruddhan K, Normansell R. Shared decision-making for people with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;10(10):CD012330. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A, Mills K, Teesson M, Marel C. Shared decision-making among people with problematic alcohol/other drug use and co-occurring mental health conditions: a systematic review. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021;40(2):307–324. doi:10.1111/dar.13149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukunaga MI, Halligan K, Kodela J, et al. Tools to promote shared decision-making in lung cancer screening using low-dose CT scanning: a systematic review. Chest. 2020;158(6):2646–2657. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.05.610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty AJ, Boland P, Reed J, et al. Barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in primary care: a systematic review. BJGP Open. 2020;4(3):bjgpopen20X101096. doi:10.3399/bjgpopen20X101096
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horey D, Kealy M, Davey MA, Small R, Crowther CA. Interventions for supporting pregnant women’s decision-making about mode of birth after a caesarean. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;7:CD010041.
   Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci. 2015;11(1). doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargraves I, LeBlanc A, Shah ND, Montori VM. Shared decision making: the need for patient-clinician conversation, not just information. Health Affair. 2016;35(4):627–629. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;333(7565):417. doi:10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niburski K, Guadagno E, Mohtashami S, Poenaru D. Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of the literature. Health Expect. 2020;23(5):1241–1249. doi:10.1111/hex.13105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin NL, Tandon VJ, Hawley ST, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of decision aids to improve decision making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2019;39(1):5–20. doi:10.1177/0272989X18803879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulsky JA, Beach MC, Butow PN, et al. A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(9):1361–1366. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefel L, Lewis KB, O’Connor A, Stacey D. 20th anniversary update of the Ottawa decision support framework: part 2 subanalysis of a systematic review of patient decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(4):522–539. doi:10.1177/0272989X20924645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafata JE, Morris HL, Dobie E, Heisler M, Werner RM, Dumenci L. Patient-reported use of collaborative goal setting and glycemic control among patients with diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(1):94–99. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Adekpedjou R, Stacey D, et al. Interventions for increasing the use of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7(7):CD006732. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar