309
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Efficacy of Two Different Hydrodynamic Sinus Lift Systems for Atraumatic Elevation in Immediate Implant Placement

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 1197-1207 | Received 29 Dec 2022, Accepted 03 May 2023, Published online: 05 May 2023

References

  • Cao Z, Yuan J. Changes in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening following the extraction of teeth with advanced periodontal disease: a retrospective study using cone-beam computed tomography. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:1–8. doi:10.1155/2021/4014797
  • Lim HC, Kim S, Kim DH, Herr Y, Chung JH, Shin S. Il Factors affecting maxillary sinus pneumatization following posterior maxillary tooth extraction. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021;51:285–295. doi:10.5051/jpis.2007220361
  • Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE. EAO supplement working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(Suppl 1):154–169. doi:10.1111/clr.12615
  • Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:613–616.
  • Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 3--less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994;15:698, 700, 702–4 passim; quiz 710.
  • Guarnieri R, Reda R, Di Nardo D, Miccoli G, Zanza A, Testarelli L. Clinical, radiographic, and biochemical evaluation of two-piece versus one-piece single implants with a laser-microgrooved collar surface after 5 years of functional loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(5):676–682. doi:10.1111/cid.13118
  • Guarnieri R, Zanza A, D’Angelo M, et al. Correlation between peri-implant marginal bone loss progression and peri-implant sulcular fluid levels of metalloproteinase-8. J Pers Med. 2022;12(1):58. doi:10.3390/jpm12010058
  • Lundgren S, Cricchio G, Hallman M, Jungner M, Rasmusson L, Sennerby L. Sinus floor elevation procedures to enable implant placement and integration: techniques, biological aspects and clinical outcomes. Periodontol. 2017;73:103–120. doi:10.1111/prd.12165
  • Cha J-K, Kim C, Pae H-C, Lee J-S, Jung U-W, Choi S-H. Maxillary sinus augmentation using biphasic calcium phosphate: dimensional stability results after 3–6 years. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019;49:47–57. doi:10.5051/jpis.2019.49.1.47
  • Calin C, Petre A, Osteotome-Mediated Sinus DS. Floor elevation: a systematic review and meta -analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2014;29(3):558–576. doi:10.11607/jomi.3206
  • Stacchi C, Andolsek F, Berton F, Perinetti G, Navarra CO. Intraoperative complications during sinus floor elevation with lateral approach: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2017;32(3):e107–e118. doi:10.11607/jomi.4884
  • Kfir E, Kfir V, Mijiritsky E, Rafaeloff R, Kaluski E. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation followed by maxillary bone augmentation and implant fixation. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:26–33. doi:10.1563/782.1
  • Kfir E, Goldstein M, Yerushalmi I, et al. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation - results of a multicenter registry. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(Suppl 1):e83–e91. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00213.x
  • Kfir E, Kfir V, Kaluski E, Mazor Z, Goldstein M. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation for single-tooth implant placement. Quintessence Int. 2011;42:645–650.
  • Kfir E, Goldstein M, Rafaelov R, et al. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation in the presence of antral septa: a report of 26 procedures. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:257–267. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00024.1
  • Mazor Z, Kfir E, Lorean A, Mijiritsky E, Horowitz RA. Flapless approach to maxillary sinus augmentation using minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation. Implant Dent. 2011;20:434–438. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e3182391fe3
  • Peñarrocha-Diago M, Galán-Gil S, Carrillo-García C, Peñarrocha-Diago D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Transcrestal sinus lift and implant placement using the sinus balloon technique. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17:e122–e128. doi:10.4317/medoral.17268
  • ElAbbasy S. Efficacy of hydraulic pressure in transcrestal sinus membrane elevation followed by immediate implant placement without bone graft. Egypt J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;10:27–33. doi:10.21608/omx.2019.13288.1028
  • Elbareki AA, Darwish SA. Transcrestal sinus lift and implant placement using the sinus balloon technique. Alexandria Dent J. 2016;41:245–252. doi:10.21608/adjalexu.2016.58034
  • Asmael HM. Is antral membrane balloon elevation truly minimally invasive technique in sinus floor elevation surgery? A systematic review. Int J Implant Dent. 2018;4:1–8. doi:10.1186/s40729-018-0123-9
  • Garbacea A, Lozada JL, Church CA, et al. The incidence of maxillary sinus membrane perforation during endoscopically assessed crestal sinus floor elevation: a pilot study. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38:345–359. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00083
  • Chen Y, Yuan S, Zhou N, Man Y. Transcrestal sinus floor augmentation with immediate implant placement applied in three types of fresh extraction sockets: a clinical prospective study with 1-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017;19:1034–1043. doi:10.1111/cid.12529
  • Jang JW, Chang H-Y, Pi S-H, Kim Y-S, You H-K. Alveolar crestal approach for maxillary sinus membrane elevation with <4 mm of residual bone height: a case report. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:1063459. doi:10.1155/2018/1063459
  • Zhao X, Gao W, Liu F. Clinical evaluation of modified transalveolar sinus floor elevation and osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19:1–7. doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2879-x
  • An X, Lee C, Fang Y, Choi B-H. Immediate nonfunctional loading of implants placed simultaneously using computer-guided flapless maxillary crestal sinus augmentation with bone morphogenetic protein-2/collagen matrix. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21:1054–1061. doi:10.1111/cid.12831
  • Gong T, Hu C, Chen Y, Zhou N, Wu H, Man Y. Raising the transcrestal sinus floor in the presence of antral pseudocysts, and in sinus floors with a normal schneiderian membrane: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;57:466–472. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.04.007
  • Baskaran P, Prakash PSG, Appukuttan D, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes for guided implant placement in sites preserved with bioactive glass bone graft after tooth extraction: a controlled clinical trial. Biomimetics. 2022;7:43. doi:10.3390/biomimetics7020043
  • Choi YJ, Kim YH, Han -S-S, et al. Alveolar bone height according to the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molar and sinus. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020;50:38–47. doi:10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.38
  • Huynh-Ba G, Pjetursson BE, Sanz M, et al. Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:37–42. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.x
  • Blanco J, Nuñez V, Aracil L, Muñoz F, Ramos I. Ridge alterations following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap versus flapless surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:640–648. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01237.x
  • Clementini M, Tiravia L, De Risi V, VittoriniOrgeas G, Mannocci A, de Sanctis M. Dimensional changes after immediate implant placement with or without simultaneous regenerative procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:666–677. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12423
  • Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol. 2017;73:73–83. doi:10.1111/prd.12167
  • Guarnieri R, Reda R, Zanza A, Miccoli G, Nardo DD, Testarelli L. Can peri-implant marginal bone loss progression and a-MMP-8 be considered indicators of the subsequent onset of peri-implantitis? A 5-year study. Diagnostics. 2022;12(11):2599. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12112599
  • Araújo MG, Silva CO, Souza AB, Sukekava F. Socket healing with and without immediate implant placement. Periodontol. 2019;79:168–177. doi:10.1111/prd.12252