Comparing Methods for Identifying Post-Market Patient Preferences at the Point of Decision-Making: Insights from Patients with Chronic Pain Considering a Spinal Cord Stimulator Device

References

• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Patient preference information—voluntary submission, review in premarket approval applications, humanitarian device exemption applications, and de novo requests, and inclusion in decision summaries and device labeling. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Pain Management and the Opioid Epidemic: Balancing Societal and Individual Benefits and Risks of Prescription Opioid Use. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton SB, Cavalier J, Langford R. The influence of race and gender on pain management: a systematic literature review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2015;16(6):968–977. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2015.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter NL, O’Callaghan KM, Califf RM. Engaging patients across the spectrum of medical product development: view from the US Food and Drug Administration. JAMA. 2015;314(23):2499–2500. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz HL, Lee T-HJ, Tsai J-H, et al. Advancing the use of patient preference information as scientific evidence in medical product evaluation: a summary report of the patient preference workshop. Patient. 2019;12(6):553–557. doi:10.1007/s40271-019-00396-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho M, Saha A, McCleary KK, et al. A framework for incorporating patient preferences regarding benefits and risks into regulatory assessment of medical technologies. Value Health. 2016;19(6):746–750. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montori VM, Brito JP, Murad MH. The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. JAMA. 2013;310(23):2503–2504. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Overbeeke E, Whichello C, Janssens R, et al. Factors and situations influencing the value of patient preference studies along the medical product lifecycle: a literature review. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(1):57–68. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soekhai V, Whichello C, Levitan B, et al. Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(7):1324–1331. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List of Patient Preference-Sensitive Priority Areas. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Patient Science and Engagement Program; 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/cdrh-patient-science-and-engagement-program/list-patient-preference-sensitive-priority-areas. Accessed September 11, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN. Spinal cord stimulation: clinical efficacy and potential mechanisms. Pain Pract. 2018;18(8):1048–1067. doi:10.1111/papr.12692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildenberg PL. History of Electrical Neuromodulation for Chronic Pain. Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc; 2006:S7–S13.
   Google Scholar
• Clingan JA, Patel A, Maher DP. Survey of spinal cord stimulation hardware currently available for the treatment of chronic pain in the United States. Front Pain Res. 2020;1:572907. doi:10.3389/fpain.2020.572907
   Google Scholar
• Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system for the treatment of chronic pain and ischemic diseases: the neuromodulation appropriateness consensus committee. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(6):515–550. doi:10.1111/ner.12208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendel MA, O’Brien T, Hoelzer BC, et al. Spinal cord stimulator related infections: findings from a multicenter retrospective analysis of 2737 implants. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(6):553–557. doi:10.1111/ner.12636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celestin J, Edwards RR, Jamison RN. Pretreatment psychosocial variables as predictors of outcomes following lumbar surgery and spinal cord stimulation: a systematic review and literature synthesis. Pain Med. 2009;10(4):639–653. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00632.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctor–patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(6):829–840. doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00376-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke K. A Grammar of Motives. Prentice Hall; 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Kunneman M, Hargraves IG, Sivly AL, et al. Co-creating sensible care plans using shared decision making: patients’ reflections and observations of encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(6):1539–1544. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen D. You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. Virago London: William Morrow; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Leaper C, Ayres MM. A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007;11(4):328–363. doi:10.1177/1088868307302221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeuwesen L, Schaap C, van der Staak C. Verbal analysis of doctor-patient communication. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(10):1143–1150. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(91)90091-p
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Kalauokalani D. Provider judgments of patients in pain: seeking symptom certainty. Pain Med. 2009;10(1):11–34. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00527.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann DE, Tarzian AJ. The girl who cried pain: a bias against women in the treatment of pain. J Law Med Ethics. 2001;29(1):13–27. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2001.tb00037.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar