Understanding benefits and addressing misperceptions and barriers to intrauterine device access among populations in the United States

References

• MosherWDJonesJUse of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008Vital Health Stat 23201029144
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: Long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devicesObstet Gynecol2011118118419621691183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RiveraRYacobsonIGrimesDThe mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devicesAm J Obstet Gynecol19991815 Pt 11263126910561657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StanfordJBMikolajczykRTMechanisms of action of intrauterine devices: update and estimation of postfertilization effectsAm J Obstet Gynecol200218761699170812501086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubacherDGrimesDANoncontraceptive health benefits of intrauterine devices: a systematic reviewObstet Gynecol Surv200257212012811832788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BednarekPHJensenJTSafety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUSInt J Womens Health20101455821072274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NilssonCGLähteenmäkiPLLuukkainenTOvarian function in amenorrheic and menstruating users of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine deviceFertil Steril198441152556420203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubacherDReyesVLilloSZepedaAChenPLCroxattoHPain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofenAm J Obstet Gynecol200619551272127717074548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescentsObstet Gynecol200711061493149518055754
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AllenRHBartzDGrimesDAHubacherDO’BrienPInterventions for pain with intrauterine device insertionCochrane Database Syst Rev2009CD00737319588429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HamiltonBEVenturaSJBirth rates for US teenagers reach historic lows for all age and ethnic groupsNCHS Data Brief20128918
   Google Scholar
• HatcherRATrussellJNelsonALCatesWJrStewartFHKowalDContraceptive Technology19th rev. edNew York (NY)Ardent Media2007
   Google Scholar
• FrenchRVan VlietHCowanFHormonally impregnated intrauterine systems (IUSs) versus other forms of reversible contraceptives as effective methods of preventing pregnancyCochrane Database Syst Rev2004CD00177615266453
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TrussellJContraceptive failure in the United StatesContraception201183539740421477680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NelsonAApterDHauckBTwo low-dose levonorgestrel intrauterine contraceptive systems: a randomized controlled trialObstet Gynecol201312261205121324240244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinnerBPeipertJFZhaoQEffectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptionN Engl J Med2012366211998200722621627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaineTRFoster-RosalesAUpadhyayUDOne-year contraceptive continuation and pregnancy in adolescent girls and women initiating hormonal contraceptivesObstet Gynecol20111172 Pt 136337121252751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Sexual experience and contraceptive use among female teens – United States, 1995, 2002, and 2006–2010MMWR. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2012611729730122552205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SwansonKJGossettDRFournierMPediatricians’ beliefs and prescribing patterns of adolescent contraception: a provider surveyJ Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol201326634034524075083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TylerCPWhitemanMKZapataLBCurtisKMHillisSDMarchbanksPAHealth care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous womenObstet Gynecol2012119476277122433340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarleyTMRosenbergMJRowePJChenJHMeirikOIntrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspectiveLancet199233987967857881347812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SimmsIRogersPCharlettAThe rate of diagnosis and demography of pelvic inflammatory disease in general practice: England and WalesInt J STD AIDS199910744845110454179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeströmLIncidence, prevalence, and trends of acute pelvic inflammatory disease and its consequences in industrialized countriesAm J Obstet Gynecol19801387 Pt 28808927008604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrimesDAIntrauterine device and upper-genital-tract infectionLancet200035692341013101911041414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuhonenSHaukkamaaMJakobssonTRauramoIClinical performance of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and oral contraceptives in young nulliparous women: a comparative studyContraception200469540741215105064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuttonMYSternbergMZaidiASt LouisMEMarkowitzLETrends in pelvic inflammatory disease hospital discharges and ambulatory visits, United States, 1985–2001Sex Transm Dis2005321277878416314776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeinstockHBermanSCatesWSexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000Perspect Sex Reprod Health200436161014982671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrSEspeyEIntrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease among adolescentsJ Adolesc Health2013524 SupplS22S2823535053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MohllajeeAPCurtisKMPetersonHBDoes insertion and use of an intrauterine device increase the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease among women with sexually transmitted infection? A systematic reviewContraception200673214515316413845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FaúndesATellesECristofolettiMLFaúndesDCastroSHardyEThe risk of inadvertent intrauterine device insertion in women carriers of endocervical Chlamydia trachomatisContraception19985821051099773265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010MMWR Recomm Rep201059RR-4186
   Google Scholar
• WilsonSFStrohsnitterWBaecher-LindLPractices and perceptions among pediatricians regarding adolescent contraception with emphasis on intrauterine contraceptionJ Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol201326528128424012129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubacherDLara-RicaldeRTaylorDJGuerra-InfanteFGuzmán-RodríguezRUse of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid womenN Engl J Med2001345856156711529209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnderssonKBatarIRyboGReturn to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-TContraception19924665755841493717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnderssonKRyde-BlomqvistELindellKOdlindVMilsomIPerforations with intrauterine devices. Report from a Swedish surveyContraception19985742512559649917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechanism of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Report of a WHO Scientific GroupWorld Health Organ Tech Rep Ser19877531913118580
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KaislasuoJSuhonenSGisslerMLähteenmäkiPHeikinheimoOUterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatmentHum Reprod20132861546155123526304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RussoJAMillerEGoldMAMyths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC)J Adolesc Health2013524 SupplS14S2123535052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HubacherDCopper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effectsContraception2007756 SupplS8S1117531622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrockmeyerAKishenMWebbAExperience of IUD/IUS insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women – a pilot studyEur J Contracept Reprod Health Care200813324825418821462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SivinIDose- and age-dependent ectopic pregnancy risks with intrauterine contraceptionObstet Gynecol19917822912982067778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SivinISternJHealth during prolonged use of levonorgestrel 20 micrograms/d and the copper TCu 380Ag intrauterine contraceptive devices: a multicenter study. International Committee for Contraception Research (ICCR)Fertil Steril199461170778293847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoardmanLAAllsworthJPhippsMGLapaneKLRisk factors for unintended versus intended rapid repeat pregnancies among adolescentsJ Adolesc Health2006394597.e1597.e816982398
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GoodmanSHendlishSKReevesMFFoster-RosalesAImpact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortionContraception200878214314818672116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IrvineGACampbell-BrownMBLumsdenMAHeikkiläAWalkerJJCameronITRandomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic menorrhagiaBr J Obstet Gynaecol199810565925989647148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BarringtonJWBowen-SimpkinsPThe levonorgestrel intrauterine system in the management of menorrhagiaBr J Obstet Gynaecol199710456146169166207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CrosignaniPGVercelliniPMosconiPOldaniSCortesiIDe GiorgiOLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus hysteroscopic endometrial resection in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleedingObstet Gynecol19979022572639241305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnderssonJKRyboGLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of menorrhagiaBr J Obstet Gynaecol19909786906942119218
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FedeleLBianchiSRaffaelliRPortueseADortaMTreatment of adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine deviceFertil Steril19976834264299314908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TangGWLoSSLevonorgestrel intrauterine device in the treatment of menorrhagia in Chinese women: efficacy versus acceptabilityContraception19955142312357796588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AnderssonKOdlindVRyboGLevonorgestrel-releasing and copper-releasing (Nova T) IUDs during five years of use: a randomized comparative trialContraception199449156728137626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SivinISternJDiazJTwo years of intrauterine contraception with levonorgestrel and with copper: a randomized comparison of the TCu 380Ag and levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day devicesContraception19873532452553111785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RönnerdagMOdlindVHealth effects of long-term use of the intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing system. A follow-up study over 12 years of continuous useActa Obstet Gynecol Scand199978871672110468065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DueholmMLevonorgestrel-IUD should be offered before hysterectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding without uterine structural abnormalities: there are no more excuses!Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand200988121302130419916888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarjoribanksJLethabyAFarquharCSurgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleedingCochrane Database Syst Rev20062CD00385516625593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HurskainenRTeperiJRissanenPQuality of life and cost-effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus hysterectomy for treatment of menorrhagia: a randomised trialLancet2001357925227327711214131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BayerLLHillardPJUse of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for medical indications in adolescentsJ Adolesc Health2013524 SupplS54S5823535058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChiCPollardDTuddenhamEGKadirRAMenorrhagia in adolescents with inherited bleeding disordersJ Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol201023421522220471874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChiCHuqFYKadirRALevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the management of heavy menstrual bleeding in women with inherited bleeding disorders: long-term follow-upContraception201183324224721310286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchaedelZEDolanGPowellMCThe use of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the management of menorrhagia in women with hemostatic disordersAm J Obstet Gynecol200519341361136316202726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LukesASReardonBArepallyGUse of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in women with hemostatic disordersFertil Steril200890367367718001734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gemzell-DanielssonKSchellschmidtIApterDA randomized, phase II study describing the efficacy, bleeding profile, and safety of two low-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive systems and MirenaFertil Steril201297361622.e122222193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LindhIMilsomIThe influence of intrauterine contraception on the prevalence and severity of dysmenorrhea: a longitudinal population studyHum Reprod20132871953196023578948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VercelliniPAimiGPanazzaSDe GiorgiOPesoleACrosignaniPGA levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis: a pilot studyFertil Steril199972350550810519624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VercelliniPFrontinoGDe GiorgiOAimiGZainaBCrosignaniPGComparison of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus expectant management after conservative surgery for symptomatic endometriosis: a pilot studyFertil Steril200380230530912909492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FedeleLBianchiSZanconatoGPortueseARaffaelliRUse of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of rectovaginal endometriosisFertil Steril200175348548811239528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LockhatFBEmemboluJOKonjeJCThe evaluation of the effectiveness of an intrauterine-administered progestogen (levonorgestrel) in the symptomatic treatment of endometriosis and in the staging of the diseaseHum Reprod200419117918414688179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LockhatFBEmemboluJOKonjeJCThe efficacy, side-effects and continuation rates in women with symptomatic endometriosis undergoing treatment with an intra-uterine administered progestogen (levonorgestrel): a 3 year follow-upHum Reprod200520378979315608040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PettaCAFerrianiRAAbraoMSRandomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a depot GnRH analogue for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosisHum Reprod20052071993199815790607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayoglu TekinYDilbazBAltinbasSKDilbazSPostoperative medical treatment of chronic pelvic pain related to severe endometriosis: levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogueFertil Steril201195249249620883991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanmahasamutPRattanachaiyanontMAngsuwathanaSTechatraisakKIndhavivadhanaSLeerasiriPPostoperative levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for pelvic endometriosis-related pain: a randomized controlled trialObstet Gynecol2012119351952622314873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PettaCAFerrianiRAAbrãoMSA 3-year follow-up of women with endometriosis and pelvic pain users of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systemEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2009143212812919181433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-SettaAMHoustonBAl-InanyHGFarquharCLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgeryCochrane Database Syst Rev20131CD00507223440798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoostJLaJoieASHertweckPLovelessMUse of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in adolescents with endometriosisJ Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol201326212012423518190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsACOG Committee Opinion. Number 310, April 2005. Endometriosis in adolescentsObstet Gynecol2005105492192715802438
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BeiningRMDennisLKSmithEMDokrasAMeta-analysis of intrauterine device use and risk of endometrial cancerAnn Epidemiol200818649249918261926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ØrboAArnesMHanckeCVereideABPettersenILarsenKTreatment results of endometrial hyperplasia after prospective D-score classification: a follow-up study comparing effect of LNG-IUD and oral progestins versus observation onlyGynecol Oncol20081111687318684496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GallosIDShehmarMThangaratinamSPapapostolouTKCoomarasamyAGuptaJKOral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysisAm J Obstet Gynecol20102036547.e1547.e1020934679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OgdenCLCarrollMDKitBKFlegalKMPrevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010JAMA2012307548349022253364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeipertJFZhaoQAllsworthJEContinuation and satisfaction of reversible contraceptionObstet Gynecol201111751105111321508749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ForrestJDUS women’s perceptions of and attitudes about the IUDObstet Gynecol Surv19965112 SupplS30S348972500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HowardDLWaymanRStricklandJLSatisfaction with and intention to continue Depo-Provera versus the Mirena IUD among post-partum adolescents through 12 months of follow-upJ Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol201326635836524238267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DickersonLMDiazVAJordonJSatisfaction, early removal, and side effects associated with long-acting reversible contraceptionFam Med2013451070170724347187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrunlohDSCasnerTSecuraGMPeipertJFMaddenTCharacteristics associated with discontinuation of long-acting reversible contraception within the first 6 months of useObstet Gynecol201312261214122124201685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HillardPJPractical tips for intrauterine devices use in adolescentsJ Adolesc Health2013524 SupplS40S4623535056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhitakerAKSiscoKMTomlinsonANDudeAMMartinsSLUse of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010J Adolesc Health201353340140623763968
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StanwoodNLBradleyKAYoung pregnant women’s knowledge of modern intrauterine devicesObstet Gynecol200610861417142217138775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KavanaughMLFrohwirthLJermanJPopkinREthierKLong-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectivesJ Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol2013262869523287602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HartmanLBShaferMAPollackLMWibbelsmanCChangFTebbKPParental acceptability of contraceptive methods offered to their teen during a confidential health care visitJ Adolesc Health201352225125423332493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EisenbergDMcNicholasCPeipertJFCost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescentsJ Adolesc Health2013524 SupplS59S6323535059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeipertJFMaddenTAllsworthJESecuraGMPreventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraceptionObstet Gynecol201212061291129723168752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HomcoJBPeipertJFSecuraGMLewisVAAllsworthJEReasons for ineffective pre-pregnancy contraception use in patients seeking abortion servicesContraception200980656957419913152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaceLEDusetzinaSBFendrickAMKeatingNLDaltonVKThe impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insuranceMed Care2013511195996324036995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar