266
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Usability testing of a monitoring and feedback tool to stimulate physical activity

, , , &
Pages 311-322 | Published online: 17 Mar 2014

References

  • HaapanenNMiilunpaloSVuoriIOjaPPasanenMAssociation of leisure time physical activity with the risk of coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes in middle-aged men and womenInt J Epidemiol19972647397479279605
  • FentemPHABC of sports medicine. Benefits of exercise in health and diseaseBMJ19943086939129112958205026
  • World Health OrganisationGlobal recommendations on physical activity for healthWorld Health OrganisationWHO Press SwitzerlandGeneva2010
  • HaskellWLLeeIMPateRRPhysical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart AssociationCirculation200711691081109317671237
  • SchillerJSLucasJWWardBWPeregoyJASummary health statistics for US adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010Vital Health Stat 102012252120722834228
  • CraigRMindellJHiraniVHealth Survey for England 2008. Volume 1: Physical Activity and FitnessLondonNHS Information Centre2009
  • HildebrandtVHBernaardsCMStubbeJHTrend Report Exercise and Health 2010/2011TNO Quality of Life, Physical Activity and Health2013 Available from: http://www.webcitation.org/6MxYEo8d6Accessed September 28, 2012
  • Lung Alliance the NetherlandsZorgstandaard COPD [Care standard COPD]AmersfoortLong Alliantie Nederland [Host]2010 Dutch
  • Dutch Diabetes FederationNDF Zorgstandaard: transparantie en kwaliteit van diabeteszorg voor mensen met diabetes type 2 [NDF Care Standard: Transparency and Quality Diabetes are for people with type 2 Diabetes]AmersfoortNederlandse Diabetes Federatie2007
  • BaanDHeijmansMMensen met COPD in bewegingFactsheet2012
  • AlbrightAFranzMHornsbyGAmerican College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and type 2 diabetesMed Sci Sports Exerc20003271345136010912903
  • CarrollJKFiscellaKEpsteinRMPhysical activity counseling intervention at a federally qualified health center: improves autonomy-supportiveness, but not patients’ perceived competencePatient Education and Counseling201392343243623932756
  • HebertETCaughyMOShuvalKPrimary care providers’ perceptions of physical activity counselling in a clinical setting: a systematic reviewBr J Sports Med201246962563122711796
  • BardsleyMSteventonADollHImpact of telehealth on general practice contacts: findings from the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trialBMC Health Services Research20131339524099334
  • PriceMYuenEKGoetterEMmHealth: a mechanism to deliver more accessible, more effective mental health careClin Psychol Psychother Epub852013
  • EspositoMRubertoMGimiglianoFEffectiveness and safety of Nintendo Wii Fit Plus™ training in children with migraine without aura: a preliminary studyNeuropsychiatr Dis Treat201391803181024453490
  • van der WeegenSVerweyRSpreeuwenbergMTangeHvan der WeijdenTde WitteLThe Development of a Mobile Monitoring and Feedback Tool to Stimulate Physical Activity of People With a Chronic Disease in Primary Care: A User-Centered DesignJMIR Mhealth and Uhealth201312e8
  • ShahSGRobinsonIBenefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluationInt J Technol Assess Health Care200723113113717234027
  • JaspersMWA comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidenceInt J Med Inform200978534035319046928
  • The international organization for standardization. 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)Part 11: Guidance on Usability1998
  • FrøkjærEHertzumMHornbækKMeasuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsApril 1–6, 2000The Hague, the NetherlandsACM PressNew York, NY, USA2000
  • NielsenJMackRLUsability Inspection MethodsNew YorkWiley1994
  • LewisJRIBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for useInt J Hum Comput Interact1995715778
  • VerweyRWeegenSvdSpreeuwenbergMTangeHWeijdenTvdWitteLdA pilot study of a tool to stimulate physical activity in patients with COPD or type 2 diabetes in primary careJ Telemed Telecare2014201293424414397
  • KirakowskiJCorbettMSUMI: the Software Usability Measurement InventoryBr J Educ Technol1993243210212
  • KirakowskiJThe Software Usability Measurement Inventory: Background and UsageJordanPThomasBWeerthmeesterBUsability Evaluation in IndustryTaylor and FrancesLondon, UK
  • BenedekJMinerTMeasuring Desirability: New methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab settingProceedings of Usability Professionals AssociationJuly 8–12Orlando2002
  • HsiehH-FShannonSEThree approaches to qualitative content analysisQual Health Res20051591277128816204405
  • WaruruAKNduatiRTylleskarTAudio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) may avert socially desirable responses about infant feeding in the context of HIVBMC Med Inform Decis Mak200552416076385
  • LukeNClarkSZuluEMThe relationship history calendar: improving the scope and quality of data on youth sexual behaviorDemography20114831151117621732169
  • SauroJ[serial on the internet] 9 Biases in Usability Testing [updated August 21, 2012]. Available from: http://www.measuringusability.com/blog/ut-bias.phpAccessed November 18, 2013
  • Why You Only Need to Test with 5 UsersEvidence-Based User Experience Research, Training, and Consulting [serial on the internet]Nielsen J2000 [updated March 19, 2000]. Available from: http://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/Accessed November 18, 2013
  • NielsenJLandauerTKA mathematical model of the finding of usability problemsPaper presented at: Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsApril 24–29, 1993Amsterdam, the NetherlandsACM PressNew York, NY, USA1993
  • PlasquiGBonomiAGWesterterpKRDaily physical activity assessment with accelerometers: new insights and validation studiesObes Rev201314645146223398786