Patient perspectives of telemedicine quality

References

• DarkinsACareyMTelemedicine and TelehealthNew York, NY, USASpringer Publishing Company2000
   Google Scholar
• MaheuMMWhittenPAllenAE-Health, Telehealth, and Telemedicine: A Guide to Start-Up and SuccessSan Francisco, CA, USAJossey-Bass2001
   Google Scholar
• SheaSKothariDTeresiJASocial impact analysis of the effects of a telemedicine intervention to improve diabetes outcomes in an ethnically diverse, medically underserved population: findings from the IDEATel StudyAm J Public Health2012103101888189423488491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrigsbyJTelehealth: an assessment of growth and distributionJ Rural Health200218234835812135155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrigsbyJSandersJTelemedicine: where it is and where it is goingAnn Intern Med199812921231279669971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LevinKMadsenJPetersenIWanscherCHangaardJTelemedicine diabetes consultations are cost-effective, and effects on essential diabetes treatment parameters are similar to conventional treatment: 7-year results from the Svendborg Telemedicine Diabetes ProjectJ Diabetes Sci Technol20137358759523759390
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CramNTelemedicine: a technology primer for clinical engineersJ Clin Eng20012616171
   Google Scholar
• LinderothHCJFiery spirits and supporting programs of action – the keys to exploration and exploitation of open technologiesInternational Journal of Health Care Technology and Management200243/4319332
   Google Scholar
• ShilePEKundelHISeshradiSBFactors affecting the electronic communication of radiological information to an intensive-care unitJ Telemed Telecare1996241992049375059
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MitchellBRMitchellJGDisneyAPUser adoption issues in renal telemedicineJ Telemed Telecare19962281869375067
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FrankenEAWhittenPSmithWLTeleradiology services for a rural hospital: a case studyJ Telemed Telecare1996231551609375050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ArmstrongAWKwongMWChaseEPLedoLNesbittTSShewrySLTeledermatology operational considerations, challenges, and benefits: the referring providers’ perspectiveTelemed J E Health201218858058422881579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRougeCGarfieldMJCrossing the telemedicine chasm: have the U.S. barriers to widespread adoption of telemedicine been significantly reduced?Int J Environ Res Public Health201310126472648424287864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRougeCGarfieldMHevnerAProvider perspectives of telemedicine encounter qualityInternational Journal of Health Care Technology and Management200564/6397419
   Google Scholar
• MairFWhittenPSystematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicineBMJ200032072481517152010834899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrennanJAKealyJAGerardiLHTelemedicine in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trialJ Telemed Telecare199951182210505365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BashshurRLTelemedicine effects: cost, quality, and accessJ Med Syst199519281917602255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KairyDTousignantMLeclercNCoteAMLevasseurMResearchersTTThe patient’s perspective of in-home telerehabilitation physiotherapy services following total knee arthroplastyInt J Environ Res Public Health20131093998401123999548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrescherSDeckwartOWinklerSKoehlerKHonoldMKoehlerFTelemedical care: feasibility and perception of the patients and physicians: a survey-based acceptance analysis of the Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure (TIM-HF) TrialEur J Prev Cardiol201320s2182423702987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von WangenheimAde Souza NobreLFTognoliHNassarSMHoKUser satisfaction with asynchronous telemedicine: a study of users of Santa Catarina’s system of telemedicine and telehealthTelemed J E Health201218533934622703378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrumpWJKumarROrsakGPfeilTA field trial of two telemedicine camera systems in family practiceArch Fam Med1998721741769519923
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WoottonRDormanJFiskNMThe effect of transmission bandwidth on diagnostic accuracy in remote fetal ultrasound scanningJ Telemed Telecare1997342092149614736
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HahmJSLeeHLChoiHSShimizuSTelemedicine system using a high-speed network: past, present, and futureGut Liver20093424725120431756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BensingJDeveugeleMMorettiFHow to make the medical consultation more successful from a patient’s perspective? Tips for doctors and patients from lay people in the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and The NetherlandsPatient Educ Couns201184328729321795007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarveyJService quality: a tutorialJournal of Operations Management1998162583597
   Google Scholar
• DeLoneWHMcLeanERThe DeLone and McLean model of information system success: a ten-year updateJournal of Management Information Systems2003194930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StamoulisDKanellisPMartakosDAn approach and model for assessing the business value of e-banking distribution channels: evaluation as communicationInt J Inf Manage2002224247261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GustkeSSBalchDCWestVLRogersLOPatient satisfaction with telemedicineTelemed J200061513
   Google Scholar
• SousaRVossCQuality management re-visited: a reflective review and agenda for future researchJournal of Operations Management200220191109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorganDLFocus Groups as Qualitative ResearchThousand Oaks, CA, USASage Publications1997
   Google Scholar
• StraussACorbinJBasics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and TechniquesNewbury Park, CA, USASage Publications1990
   Google Scholar
• TrauthEJessupLUnderstanding computer-mediated discussions: positivist and interpretive analyses of group support system useMIS Quarterly20002414379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndersonJCRungtusanathamMSchroederRGA theory of quality management underlying the Deming management methodAcad Manage Rev1994193472509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GarvinDWhat does “product quality” really meanSloan Manage Rev19842612545
   Google Scholar
• JuranJManaging for qualityJournal of Quality and Participation1988111812
   Google Scholar
• Barneveld BinkhuysenFHRanschaertERTeleradiology: evolution and conceptsEur J Radiol201178220520920869183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar