Older adults’ preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice

References

• U. S. Preventive Services Task ForceScreening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statementAnn Intern Med2008149962763718838716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithRACokkinidesVBrawleyOWCancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screeningCA Cancer J Clin2009591274119147867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listedColon cancer screening (USPSTF recommendation). U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceJ Am Geriatr Soc200048333333510733063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC)Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use – United States, 2012MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2013624488188824196665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KlabundeCNShapiroJAKobrinSNadelMRZapkaJMColorectal cancer screening in US seniors ages 76–84 YearsJ Community Health Epub2015226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoldenDJJonasDEPorterfieldDSReulandDHarrisRSystematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screeningAnn Intern Med20101521066867620388703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InadomiJMVijanSJanzNKAdherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategiesArch Intern Med2012172757558222493463
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KuipersEJRöschTBretthauerMColorectal cancer screening – optimizing current strategies and new directionsNat Rev Clin Oncol201310313014223381005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LingBSTrauthJMFineMJInformed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?Med Care2008469 Suppl 1S23S2918725829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WolfMSBakerDWMakoulGPhysician-patient communication about colorectal cancer screeningJ Gen Intern Med200722111493149917851721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ClarkMDDetermannDPetrouSMoroDde Bekker-GrobEWDiscrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literaturePharmacoeconomics201432988390225005924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WortleySWongGKieuAHowardKAssessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experimentsPatient20147327128224652475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gyrd-HansenDSøgaardJAnalysing public preferences for cancer screening programmesHealth Econ200110761763411747045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van DamLHolLde Bekker-GrobEWWhat determines individuals’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening programmes? A discrete choice experimentEur J Cancer201046115015919683432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HolLde Bekker-GrobEWvan DamLPreferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experimentBr J Cancer2010102697298020197766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ImaedaABenderDFraenkelLWhat is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening?J Gen Intern Med201025768869320309740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HawleySTVolkRJKrishnamurthyPJibaja-WeissMVernonSWKneuperSPreferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patientsMed Care2008469 Suppl 1S10S1618725820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PignoneMPBrennerATHawleySConjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screeningJ Gen Intern Med2012271455021870192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SalkeldGSolomonMShortLRyanMWardJEEvidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screeningAust N Z J Public Health200327444945514705310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FrewEWolstenholmeJLWhynesDKWillingness-to-pay for colorectal cancer screeningEur J Cancer200137141746175111549427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshallDAJohnsonFRPhillipsKAMarshallJKThabaneLKulinNAMeasuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format surveyValue Health200710541543017888107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NayaradouMBerchiCDejardinOLaunoyGEliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organizationMed Decis Making201030222423319692710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HowardKSalkeldGDoes attribute framing in discrete choice experiments influence willingness to pay? Results from a discrete choice experiment in screening for colorectal cancerValue Health200912235436318657102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WolffJLStarfieldBAndersonGPrevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderlyArch Intern Med2002162202269227612418941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WalterLCCovinskyKECancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision makingJAMA2001285212750275611386931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaplanGACamachoTPerceived health and mortality: a nine-year follow-up of the human population laboratory cohortAm J Epidemiol198311732923046829557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteffenTMHackerTAMollingerLAge- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speedsPhys Ther200282212813711856064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobinsonTNWallaceJIWuDSAccumulated frailty characteristics predict postoperative discharge institutionalization in the geriatric patientJ Am Coll Surg201121313742 discussion 42–4421435921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuaYHAllometric analysis of physical performance measures in older adultsPhys Ther20068691263127016959674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TombaughTNTrail Making Test A and B: normative data stratified by age and educationArch Clin Neuropsychol200419220321415010086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LouviereJJHensherDASwaitJDStated Choice Methods: Analysis and ApplicationCambridgeCambridge University Press2000
   Google Scholar
• OrmeBKInterpreting the results of conjoint analysisOrmeBKGetting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research2nd edMadisonResearch Publishers20107788
   Google Scholar
• OrmeBKFormulating attributes and levels in conjoint analysisOrmeBKGetting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research2nd edMadisonResearch Publishers20105156
   Google Scholar
• PignoneMRichMTeutschSMBergAOLohrKNScreening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAnn Intern Med2002137213214112118972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KewenterJBrevingeHEndoscopic and surgical complications of work-up in screening for colorectal cancerDis Colon Rectum19963966766808646956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BridgesJFHauberABMarshallDConjoint analysis applications in health – a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task ForceValue in Health201114440341321669364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuckTLuppaMBrielSRiedel-HellerSGIncidence of mild cognitive impairment: a systematic reviewDement Geriatr Cogn Disord201029216417520150735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CallahanCMUnverzagtFWHuiSLPerkinsAJHendrieHCSix-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical researchMed Care200240977178112218768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellizziKMBreslauESBurnessAWaldronWPrevalence of cancer screening in older, racially diverse adults: still screening after all these yearsArch Intern Med2011171222031203722158573
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChenXWhiteMCPeipinsLASeeffLCIncrease in screening for colorectal cancer in older Americans: results from a national surveyJ Am Geriatr Soc20085681511151618662217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoyceTJHendrixLHStokesWAAllenIMChenRCCancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectanciesJAMA Intern Med2014174101558156525133746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OrmeBKSample size issues for conjoint analysisOrmeBKGetting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research2nd edMadisonResearch Publishers20105766
   Google Scholar
• JohnsonRMUnderstanding HB: An Intuitive ApproachSequim (WA)Sawtooth Software2000 Available from: https://sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/undhb.pdfAccessed April 8, 2015
   Google Scholar
• RyanMFarrarSUsing conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health careBMJ200032072481530153310834905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RyanMGerardKUsing discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflectionsAppl Health Econ Health Policy200321556414619274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OrmeBCBC/Web Analysis Module and Market SimulatorSequim (WA)Sawtooth Software2001
   Google Scholar
• OrmeBKMarket simulators for conjoint analysisOrmeBKGetting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research2nd edMadisonResearch Publishers201089103
   Google Scholar
• GrbichCQualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction2nd edLondonSage Publications2013
   Google Scholar
• PignoneMPCrutchfieldTMBrownPMUsing a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North CarolinaBMC Health Serv Res20141461125433801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrennerAHowardKLewisCComparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and AustraliaJ Gen Intern Med201429350751324272830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShokarNKCarlsonCAWellerSCInformed decision making changes test preferences for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse populationAnn Fam Med20108214115020212301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KistlerCELewisCLAmickHRBynumDLWalterLCWatsonLCOlder adults’ beliefs about physician-estimated life expectancy: a cross-sectional surveyBMC Fam Pract20067916472399
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LewisCLKistlerCEAmickHROlder adults’ attitudes about continuing cancer screening later in life: a pilot study interviewing residents of two continuing care communitiesBMC Geriatr200661016887040
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MeissnerHIBreenNKlabundeCNVernonSWPatterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United StatesCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev200615238939416492934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FentonJJJerantAFvon Friederichs-FitzwaterMMTancrediDJFranksPPhysician counseling for colorectal cancer screening: impact on patient attitudes, beliefs, and behaviorJ Am Board Fam Med201124667368122086810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WolfASchorlingJBDoes informed consent alter elderly patients’ preferences for colorectal cancer screening?J Gen Intern Med2001151243010632830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RyanMWatsonVEntwistleVRationalising the ‘irrational’: a think aloud study of discrete choice experiment responsesHealth Econ200918332133618651601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LancsarELouviereJDeleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?Health Econ200615879781116615039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeekerCKraftJMSouthwellBGJorgensenCMColorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for interventionJ Community Health200025326327810868818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CallahanCMUnverzagtFWHuiSLPerkinsAJHendrieHCSix-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical researchMed Care200240977178112218768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArozullahAMYarnoldPRBennettCLDevelopment and validation of a short-form, rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicineMed Care200745111026103318049342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KroenkeKSpitzerRLWilliamsJBThe Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screenerMed Care200341111284129214583691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdlerNEEpelESCastellazzoGIckovicsJRRelationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white womenHealth Psychol200019658659211129362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeSJLindquistKSegalMRCovinskyKEDevelopment and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adultsJAMA2006295780180816478903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar