Developing a discrete choice experiment in Malawi: eliciting preferences for breast cancer early detection services

References

• ParkinDMBrayFFerlayJJemalACancer in Africa 2012Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev201423695396624700176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarfordJBBreast-cancer early detection in low-income and middle-income countries: do what you can versus one size fits allLancet Oncol201112330631221376292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorbexMBurtonRSancho-GarnierHBreast cancer early detection methods for low and middle income countries, a review of the evidenceBreast201221442843422289154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndersonBOCazapEEl SaghirNSOptimisation of breast cancer management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: executive summary of the breast health global initiative consensus, 2010Lancet Oncol201112438739821463833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuthoniAMillerANAn exploration of rural and urban Kenyan women’s knowledge and attitudes regarding breast cancer and breast cancer early detection measuresHealth Care Women Int201031980181620677038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MareeJEWrightSCHow would early detection be possible? An enquiry into cancer related knowledge, understanding and health seeking behaviour of urban black women in Tshwane, South AfricaEur J Oncol Nurs201014319019619944646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bekker-GrobEWRyanMGerardKDiscrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literatureHealth Econ201221214517222223558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RyanMGerardKUsing discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflectionsAppl Health Econ Health Policy200321556414619274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LancasterKJA new approach to consumer theoryJ Polit Econ1966742132157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BridgesJFHauberABMarshallDConjoint analysis applications in health – a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task forceValue Health201114440341321669364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoastJAl-JanabiHSuttonEJUsing qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendationsHealth Econ201221673074121557381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShumwayMSentellTChouljianTTellierJRozewiczFOkunMAssessing preferences for schizophrenia outcomes: comprehension and decision strategies in three assessment methodsMent Health Serv Res20035312113515224446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WoloshinSSchwartzLMMoncurMGabrielSTostesonANAssessing values for health: numeracy mattersMed Decis Making200121538239011575488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malawi Ministry of HealthHealth InstitutionsSocial and Community Services2013 Available from: http://www.malawi.gov.mw
   Google Scholar
• Malawi Ministry of HealthMalawi Health Sector Strategic Plan 2011–2016: Moving Towards Equity and QualityLilongwe2011148 Available from: http://malawipublichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Malawi-HSSP-Summary.pdfAccessed: February 1, 2015
   Google Scholar
• MuulaASCase for clinical officers and medical assistants in MalawiCroat Med J2009501777819260148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GopalSKrysiakRLiombaGBuilding a pathology laboratory in MalawiLancet Oncol201314429129223561742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malawi Ministry of HealthMalawi National Reproductive Health Service Delivery GuidelinesReproductive Health Unit2009135150
   Google Scholar
• Malawi Ministry of HealthVIA Programme Report June 2011Lilongwe, Malawi2011
   Google Scholar
• SorensenGEmmonsKHuntMKModel for incorporating social context in health behavior interventions: applications for cancer prevention for working-class, multiethnic populationsPrev Med200337318819712914824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlynnTNLouviereJJPetersTJCoastJBest-worst scaling: what it can do for health care research and how to do itJ Health Econ200726117118916707175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarleyAPihlensDModels of best-worst choice and ranking among multiattribute options (profiles)J Math Psychol20125612434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FlynnTNValuing citizen and patient preferences in health: recent developments in three types of best-worst scalingExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res201010325926720545591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WillisGBCasparRLesslerJCognitive interviewing: a “how to” guidePaper Presented at: Short Course Presented at the Meeting of the American Statistical Association1999
   Google Scholar
• LiangWLawrenceWFBurnettCBAcceptability of diagnostic tests for breast cancerBreast Cancer Res Treat200379219920612825854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GerardKShanahanMLouviereJUsing stated preference discrete choice modelling to inform health care decision-making: a pilot study of breast screening participationAppl Econ200335910731085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyrd-HansenDCost-benefit analysis of mammography screening in Denmark based on discrete ranking dataInt J Technol Assess Health Care2000160381182111028136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyrd-HansenDSøgaardJAnalysing public preferences for cancer screening programmesHealth Econ200110761763411747045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LinsellLForbesLJPatnickJWardleJAustokerJRamirezAJWomen’s preferences for the delivery of the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme: a cross-sectional surveyJ Med Screen201017417618021258127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuptaSVijACafieroERetail venue based screening mammography: assessment of women’s preferencesAcad Radiol201219101268127222958721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarcusENDrummondDDietzNUrban women’s preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative studyJ Cancer Educ201227115616422072125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BechMSørensenJLauridsenJEliciting women’s preferences for a training program in breast self-examination: a conjoint ranking experimentValue Health20058447948716091025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HansonKMcPakeBNakambaPArchardLPreferences for hospital quality in Zambia: results from a discrete choice experimentHealth Econ200514768770115619273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrukMEPaczkowskiMMbarukuGde PinhoHGaleaSWomen’s preferences for place of delivery in rural Tanzania: a population-based discrete choice experimentAm J Public Health20099991666167219608959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KrukMEPaczkowskiMMTegegnAWomen’s preferences for obstetric care in rural ethiopia: a population-based discrete choice experiment in a region with low rates of facility deliveryJ Epidemiol Community Health2010641198498819822558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChristofidesNJMuirheadDJewkesRKPenn-KekanaLConcoDWomen’s experiences of and preferences for services after rape in South Africa: interview studyBMJ2006332753520921316330476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani-CostantiniRDiagnosis: breast cancer screening in rural African communitiesNat Rev Clin Oncol201310418518623478282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbuidrisDOElsheikhAAliMBreast-cancer screening with trained volunteers in a rural area of Sudan: a pilot studyLancet Oncol201314436337023375833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndersonBOUnderstanding social obstacles to early breast cancer detection is critical to improving breast cancer outcome in low- and middle-resource countriesCancer2010116194436443920572044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MareeJLuXWrightSCombining breast and cervical screening in an attempt to increase cervical screening uptake. An intervention study in a South African contextEur J Cancer Care20122117886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TumSJMareeJEClarkeMCreating awareness and facilitating cervical and breast cancer screening uptake through the use of a community health worker: a pilot intervention studyEur J Cancer Care2013221107116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhittyJAWalkerRGolenkoXRatcliffeJA think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methodsPLoS One201494e9063524759637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNICEFMalawi Country Statistics2014 Available from: http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/malawi_statistics.htmlAccessed March 2014
   Google Scholar
• ChamotEMulambiaCKapambweSPreference for human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening: results of a choice-based conjoint study in ZambiaJ Low Genit Tract Dis201419211912325279979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OstermannJNjauBBrownDSMühlbacherAThielmanNHeterogeneous HIV testing preferences in an urban setting in Tanzania: results from a discrete choice experimentPLoS One201493e9210024643047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbiiroGATorbicaAKwalamasaKDe AllegriMEliciting community preferences for complementary micro health insurance: a discrete choice experiment in rural MalawiSoc Sci Med19822014120160168
   Google Scholar
• Michaels-IgbokweCLagardeMCairnsJTerris-PrestholtFUsing decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural MalawiSoc Sci Med201410509310224509049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar