Patients’ and physicians’ preferences for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatments in Spain and Portugal: a discrete choice experiment

References

• American Diabetes AssociationStandards of Medical Care in diabetes –2014Diabetes Care201437Suppl 1S14S8024357209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValdésSRojo-MartínezGSoriguerFEvolution of prevalence of type 2 diabetes in adult Spanish populationMed Clin (Barc)2007129935235517910853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SoringerFGodayABosch-comasABordiuEPrevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose regulation in Spain: the [email protected] StudyDiabetologia201255889321987347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Observatório Nacional da DiabetesDiabetes: Factos e Números 2012 Available from: http://www.ulsm.min-saude.pt/ResourcesUser/Documentos/i018361.pdfAccessed: November, 2013
   Google Scholar
• GuariguataLWhitingDRHambletonIBeagleyJLinnenkampUShawJEGlobal estimated of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035Diabetes Res Clin Pract201410313714924630390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KahnSECooperMEDel PratoSPathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present and futureLancet20143831068108324315620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García PérezLEAlvarezMDillaTGil-GuillenVOrozco BeltranDAdherence to therapies in patients with Type 2 diabetesDiabetes Ther2013417579823990497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LarkinAHoffmanCStevensADouglasABloomgardenZDeterminants of adherence to diabetes treatmentJ Diabetes Epub201517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LizánLComellasMPazSPovedaJLMeleticheDMPolancoCTreatment adherence and other patient reported outcomes as cost determinant in multiple sclerosis: a review of the literaturePatient Prefer Adherence201481653166425525341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PorzsoltFClouthJDeutschmannMHipplerHJPreferences of diabetes patients and physicians: a feasibility study to identify the key indicators for appraisal of health care valuesHealth Qual Life Outcomes2010812521050469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PoulosCGonzalezJMLeeLPhysicians preferences for extra glycemic effects of type 2 diabetes treatmentsDiabetes Ther2013444345924254337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MühlbacherACJuhnkeCPatient preferences versus physicians’ judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?Appl Health Econ Health Policy20131116318023529716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JohnsonFRHauberBOzdemirSStiegelCAHassSSandsBEAre gastroenterologists less tolerant of treatment risk than patients? Benefit-risk preferences in Crohn’s disease managementJ Manag Care Pharm2010168606628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Diabetes AssociationStrategies for improving care. Sec 1 in Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2015Diabetes Care201538Suppl 1S5S725537709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VineyRLancsarELouviereJDiscrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcareExpert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res2002248996
   Google Scholar
• RyanMGerardKUsing discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflectionsAppl Health Econ Health Policy200321556414619274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ScottAIdentifying and analysing dominant preferences in discrete choice experiments: an application in health careJ Econ Psychol200223383398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonFRMohamedAFÖzdemirSMarchallDAPhillipsKAHow does cost matter in health care Discrete Choice Experiments?Health Econ20112032333020217834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekker-GrobEWRyanMGerardKDiscrete choice experiments in heath economics: a review of the literatureHealth Econ20122114517222223558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BridgesJFPHauberABMarshallDConjoint Analysis applications I Health: a Checklist of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint analysis Task ForceValue Health20111440341321669364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HigginsJPTGreenSCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]The Cochrane Collaboration2011 Available from: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
   Google Scholar
• AristidesMWestonARFitzGeraldPLe ReunCManidakisNPatient preference and willingness-to-pay for Humalog Mix25 relative to Humulin 30/70: a multicountry application of a discrete choice experimentValue Health20047444245415449636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BogelundMVilsbollTFaberJHenriksenJEGjesingRPLammertMPatient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark – a discrete choice experimentCurr Med Res Opin201127112175218321981417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JendleJTorffvitORidderstraleMLammertMEricssonABogelundMWillingness to pay for health improvements associated with anti-diabetes treatments for people with type 2 diabetesCurr Med Res Opin201026491792320163195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JendleJRidderstraleMTorfvittOEricssonALarsenSWillingness-to-pay for benefits associated with basal insulin treatment of type 2 diabetesJ Med Econ201215226126322142237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• JendleJTorffvitORidderstraleMWillingness to pay for diabetes drug therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: based on LEAD clinical programme resultsJ Med Econ201215Suppl 21522853443
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MohamedAFZhangJJohnsonFRAvoidance of weight gain is important for oral type 2 diabetes treatments in Sweden and Germany: patients preferencesDiabetes Metab20133939740323880594
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van EverdingenYMWaartsEThe effect of national culture on the adoption of innovationsMark Letters2003143217232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JavidanMHouseRJDorfmanPWConceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approachesJ Int Bus Stud200637897914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonFRLancsarEMarshallDConstructing experimental designs for discrete choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task ForceValue Health20131631323337210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AizakiHBasic functions for supporting an implementation of choice experiments in RJ Stat Softw201250212425317082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BechMKjaerTLaurdsenJDoes the number of choice set matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experimentHealth Econ20112027328620143304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Statistics of Spain (population, 2012)Population by Reference Date, Sex and Age Available from: http://www.ine.esAccessed: November, 2013
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Statistics of Portugal (Censos, 2011)População residente, segundo a dimensão dos lugares, população isolada, embarcada, corpo diplomático e sexo, por idade (ano a ano) Available from: http://censos.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=CENSOS&xpgid=censos_quadros_populacao
   Google Scholar
• Interactive Consultation NHS Available from: http://www.msssi.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/sisInfSanSNS/home.htmAccessed: Novemberm, 2013
   Google Scholar
• Administraçao Central do Sistema de SaúdeEstudo de necessidade previsionais de recursos humanos em saúde – MédicosLisboaAdministraçao Central do Sistema de Saúde2009 Available from: http://www.acss.min-saude.pt/Portals/0/Relat%C3%B3rio%20Final_M%C3%A9dicos.pdfAccessed: November, 2013
   Google Scholar
• de Bekker-GrobEDonkersBJonkerMFStolkEASample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare. A practical guidePatient 2015 Epub20153110.1007/s40271-015-0118-z
   Google Scholar
• World Health OrganizationHow to Construct a Discrete Choice Experiment for Health Workforce Recruitment and Retention in Remote and Rural Areas: A User Guide with Case StudiesGenevaWorld Health Organization2012 Available from: http://www.capacityplus.org/files/resources/discrete-choice-experiment-user-guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CroissantYmlogit: Multinomial Logit ModelCran R project.org2011 Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/packagemlogitAccessed: July, 2014
   Google Scholar
• McFaddenDConditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviorZarembkaPFrontiers in EconometricsNew YorkAcademic Press1974105142
   Google Scholar
• TropeYLibermanNConstrual-level theory of psychological distancePsychol Rev2010117244046320438233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LöckenhoffCEAge, time and decision making: from processing speed to global time horizonsAnn NY Acad Sci20111235445622023567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KleinSSheardNFPi-SunyerXWeight management through lifestyle modification for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: rationale and strategiesDiabetes Care20042782067207315277443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MandevilleKLLagardeMHansonKThe use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic reviewBMC Health Serv Res20141436725179422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoleARA comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measuresHealth Econ20071682784017238222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuimaraesCMarraCAGillSA discrete choice experiment evaluation of patient’s preferences for different risk, benefit and delivery attributes of insulin therapy for diabetes managementPatient Prefer Adherence2010443344021301591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrameRPaternosterRMazerollePPiqueroATesting for the equality of Maximum likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equationsJ Quant Criminol1998143245261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaternosterRBrameRMazerollePPiqueroAUsing the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficientsCriminology1998364859866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International conference on harmonization of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human useICH harmonized tripartite guideline: guideline for good clinical practice E6(R1)1996 Available at: http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R1_Guideline.pdfAccessed: January, 2015
   Google Scholar
• HauberABHanSYangJCEffect of pill burden on dosing preferences, willingness to pay and likely adherence among patients with type 2 diabetesPatients Prefer Adherence20137937949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EvansMJensenHHBogelubdMFlexible insulin dosing improves health related quality of life (HRQOL): a time trade off surveyJ Med Econ201316111357136524111563
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ShafieeGMohajeri-TeharaniMPajouhiMLarijaniBThe importance of hypoglycemia in diabetic patientsJ Diabetes Metab Disord2012111723497433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LorberDImportance of cardiovascular disease and risk management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusDiabetes Metab Syndrome Obes20147169183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WildingJPHThe importance of weight management in type 2 diabetes mellitusInt J Clin Pract20146868269124548654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MatzaLSYurginNBoyeKSMalleyKShorrJMObese versus non obese patients with type 2 diabetes: patient-reported outcomes and utility of weight changeCurr Med Res Opin20072392051206217651535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KahnemanDTverskyAProspect Theory: an analysis of decision under riskEconometrica1979472263192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DealKKeshavjeeKTroyanSKybaRHolbrookAMPhysicians and patients willingness to pay for electronic cardiovascular disease managementInt J Med Inform21483517528
   Google Scholar
• MolPGMArnardottirAHStrausSMJUnderstanding drug preferences, different perspectivesBr J Clin Pharmacol2014 Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.12566/pdf
   Google Scholar
• HauberBGonzalezJMGroothuis-OutdshoornKGMConjoint analysis statistical analysis: an ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force Report. Draft for review Available from: http://www.ispor.org/taskforces/documents/ISPOR-Conjoint-Analysis-Statistical-Analysis-GRP-TF-Report-DRAFT-for-REVIEW.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ClarkMDDetermanDPetrouSMoroDBekker-GrobEWDiscrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literaturePhamaco Economics201432883902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar